Current Epistemological Problems in Evidence-based Medicine
Chapter
- 1k Downloads
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Ashcroft RE (2002) What is clinical effectiveness? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 33C:219–233Google Scholar
- 2.Ashcroft RE (1999) Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice. Bioethics 13:314–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ashcroft RE (2000) Giving medicine a fair trial. British Medical Journal 320:1686PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bradley FH (1930) Appearance and Reality. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 5.Carpenter WJ, Appelbaum PS, Levine RJ (2002) The Declaration of Helsinki and clinical trials: A focus on placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 160:356–362Google Scholar
- 6.Cartwright N (1989) Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cartwright N (1983) How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cochrane AL (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 9.Davies HTO, Nutley SM, Smith PC (Eds.) (2000) What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dreyfus HL (1992) What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dupré J (1995) Review of Kitcher The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Philosophical Review 104:147–151Google Scholar
- 12.Edwards SJL, Lilford RJ, Braunholtz D, Jackson J (1997) Why ‘underpowered’ trials are not necessarily unethical. Lancet 350:804–807CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG (2001) Systematic Reviews in Healthcare: Meta-analysis in Context. BMJ Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ellenberg SS, Temple R (2000) Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments, part 2: practical issues and specific cases. Annals of Internal Medicine 133: 464–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gillies D (2000) Philosophical Theories of Probability. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 16.Goodman KW (2002) Ethics and Evidence-based Medicine: Fallibility and Responsibility in Clinical Science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 17.Greenhalgh T (2000) How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-based Medicine. BMJ Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 18.Grünbaum A (1984) The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- 19.Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time. (Trans. Mac-Quarrie J, Robinson E) Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hill AB (1991) Principles of Medical Statistics. In: Sackett D, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. (Eds.) Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Little, Brown, Boston, P 284Google Scholar
- 21.Howie D (2002) Interpreting Probability: Controversies and Developments in the Early Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 22.Italian Study Group for the Di Bella Multitherapy Trials (1999) Evaluation of an unconventional cancer treatment (the Di Bella multitherapy): Results of phase II trials in Italy. British Medical Journal 318:224–228Google Scholar
- 23.Jardine N (1986) The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jardine N (2000) The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 25.Jeffrey R (1983) The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kant I (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. (Trans. Matthews E) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 27.Kaplan M (1996) Decision Theory as Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 28.Maher P (1993) Betting on Theories. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 29.Morton A (2002) The Importance of Being Understood: Folk Psychology as Ethics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 30.Oakley A (1999) Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 31.Plato (1987) Theaetetus. (Trans. Waterfield RAH) Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 32.Psillos S (1999) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks the Truth. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 33.Ryle G (2000) The Concept of Mind. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 34.Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 35.Stevens A, Abrams K, Brazier J, Fitzpatrick R, Lilford R (2001) The Advanced Handbook of Methods in Evidence-Based Healthcare. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 36.Vaihinger H (2000) The Philosophy of ‘As If’. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 37.Veatch RM (2002) Indifference of subjects: An alternative to clinical equipoise in randomized clinical trials. In: Paul EF, Miller FD, Paul J (Eds.) Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P 295–323Google Scholar
- 38.Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical Investigations. (Trans. Anscombe GEM) Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 39.Worrall J (2002a) What evidence in Evidence-based Medicine? Philosophy of Science 69:S316–S330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Worrall J (2002b) What Evidence in Evidence-based Medicine. London School of Economics, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 41.Zagzebski LT (1996) Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 42.Zarkovich E, Upshur REG (2002) The Virtues of Evidence. Theoretical Medicine 23:403–412Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005