Advertisement

Beyond Legitimate Science: The Case for Policy-Related Science

  • Mariachiara Tallacchini
Chapter
  • 968 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bastian H (2000) Allies or enemies? Evidence-based Medicine and consumer choice. MJA 172:5–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein DE (2001) Frye, Frye, Again: The Past, Present, and Future of the General Acceptance Test. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 01-07. http://ssrn.com/abstract=262034Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brazier M, Miola J (2000) Bye-Bye Bolam: A Medical Litigation Revolution? Medical Law Review 8:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Commission of the European Communities (2000a) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Commission of the European Communities (2000b) Governance and Expertise. http://governance.jrc.it/Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Commission of the European Communities (2001) European Governance. A White Paper. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_ 0428en01.pdfGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coulter A (1999) Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there’s no going back. BMJ 1319:719–20Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Munck J, Lenoble J (2001) Transformations in the art of governance. A genealogical and historical examination of changes in the governance of democratic societies. In: De Schutter O, Lebessis N, Paterson J (Eds.) Governance in the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, P 29–51Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Schutter O, Lebessis N, Paterson J (Eds.) (2001) Governance in the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ezrahi Y (1990) The Descent of Icarus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farrel MG (1994) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Epistemology and Legal Process. Cardozo Law Review 15:2183–2217Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freeman M, Reece H (Eds.) (1998) Science in Court. Aldershot, DartmouthGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Funtowicz S, Shepherd I, Winkinson D, Ravetz J (2000) Science and Governance in the European Union: a contribution to the debate. Science and Public Policy 27:327–336Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerold R, Liberatore A (2001) Report of the working group “Democratising expertise and establishing scientific reference systems”. http://europa.eu.int/comm/governance/areas/group2/report_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Irwin A, Wynne B (Eds.) (1996) Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jasanoff S (1990) The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policy makers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jasanoff S (1995) Science at the Bar. Law, Science, and Technology in America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jasanoff S (1996) Is Science Socially Constructed — And Can It Still Inform Public Policy? Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 263–276Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jones M, Guston DH, Branscomb LM (1996) Informed Legislature. Coping with Science in a Democracy. CSIA Harvard University, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lebessis N, Paterson J (2001) Recent developments in institutional and administrative reform. In: De Schutter O, Lebessis N, Paterson J (Eds.) Governance in the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, P 259–305Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merton RK (1968) Science and Democratic Social Structure. In: Merton RK (Ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York, P 604–615Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nowotny H, Scott P, Michael G (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Polanyi M (1962) The Republic of Science. Minerva I: 54–73Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porter T (1995) Trust in Numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shepherd I (Ed.) (2000) Science and Governance in the European Union. A Contribution to the Debate. http://governance.jrc.it/scandg-eur.pdfGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith R, Wynne B (Eds.) (1989) Expert Evidence. Interpreting Science in the Law. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tallacchini M (2002a) The Epistemic State. The Legal Regulation of Science. In: Mazzoni CM (Ed.) Ethics and Law in Biological Research. Kluwer, Dordrecht, P 79–96Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tallacchini M (2002b) Epistemology of the European Identity. The Journal of Biolaw & Business, Supplement Series Bioethix: 60–66Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wildavsky A (1987) Speaking Truth To Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariachiara Tallacchini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations