The Role of Formal Outcome Evaluations in Health Policy Making: A Normative Perspective

  • Ole F. Norheim


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beitz C (1989) Political equality. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broome J (1993) QALYs. Journal of Public Economics 50: 149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cubbon J (1991) The principle of QALY maximisation as the basis for allocating ealth care. Journal of medical ethics 17:181–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels N (1985) Just health care: studies in philosophy and health policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daniels N (1994a) Four unsolved rationing problems. A challenge. Hastings Center Report 24:27–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniels N (1994b) Principles for national health care reform. Hastings Center Report 24:8–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daniels N (2000) Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ 321: 1300–01PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniels N, Light D, Caplan RL (1996) Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniels N, Sabin J (1997) Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers. Philosophy & Public Affairs 26:303–50Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels N, Sabin JE (1995) The yin and yang of health care system reform. Professional and political strategies for setting limits. Archives of Family Medicine 4:67–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B (1999) Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public’s views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ 318:916–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drummond M, Stoddart G, Torrance G (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O’Brian BJ, Levine M, Heyland D (1997) User’s guides to the Medical Literature. XIII How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? The Evidence-based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 277: 1552–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eddy DM (1990) Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA 263:441–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elster J (1986) The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory. In: Elster J, Hylland A (Eds.) Foundations of social choice theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P 103–32Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elster J (Ed.) (1998) Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerard K, Mooney G (1993) QALY league tables. Handle with care. Health Economics 2:59–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutman A, Thompson D (1996) Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ham C (1995) Synthesis: what can we learn from international experience? British Medical Bulletin 51:819–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ham C, Coulter A (2000) Where are we now? In: Coulter A, Ham C (Eds.) The global challenge of health care rationing. Open University Press; LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ham C, Locock L (1998) International Approaches To Priority Setting In Health Care: An Annotated Listing Of Official And Semi-Official Publications. With A Selection Of Key Academic References. University of Birmingham, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Holm S (1998) The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ 317:1000–2Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klein R (1993) Dimensions of rationing: who should do what? BMJ 307:309–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McKneally M, Dickens B, Meslin E, Singer P (1997) Bioethics for clinicians:13. Resource allocation. CMAJ 1157:163–7Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mooney G, Olsen JA (1991) QALYs. Where next? In: McGurie A et al. (Eds.) Providing Health Care. The economics of alternative systems of finance and delivery. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Murray C, Lopez A (Eds.) (1996) The Global Burden of Disease. Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    New B (1996) The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group. BMJ 312:1593–601 H, Singer P (1995) Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian surveyPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nord E (1994) The QALY — a measure of social value rather than individual utility? Health Economics 3:89–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nord E (1995) The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programs. Medical Decision Making 15:201–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nord E (1999) Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nord E, Pinto JL, Richardson J, Menzel P, Ubel P (1999) Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. Health Economics 8:25–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nord E, Richardson J, Macarounas-Kirchmann K (1993) Social evaluation of health care versus personal evaluation of health states. Evidence on the validity of four health-state scaling instruments using Norwegian and Australian surveys. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 9:463–478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nord E, Richardson J, Street A, Kuhse H, Singer P (1995) Maximizing health benefits vs egalitarianism: an Australian survey of health issues. Social Science and Medicine 41:1429–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Norheim O (2002) The role of evidence in health policy making: a normative perspective. Health Care Analysis 10:309–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Norheim OF (1996) Limiting access to health care: a contractualist approach to fair rationing. University of Oslo, OsloGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Norheim OF (1999) Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines? BMJ 319: 1426–1429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rawls J (1982) Social unity and primary goods. In: Sen AK, Williams B (Eds.) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P 159–185Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rawls J (1993) Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rosser R, Kind P (1978) A scale of valuations of states of illness. Is there a social consensus? International Journal of Epidemiology 7: 347–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sackett DL, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB (1997) Evidence-based Medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scanlon TM (1982) Contractualism and utilitarianism. In: Sen AK, Williams B (Eds.) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P 103–128Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scanlon TM (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sen A (1997) On economic inequality. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Singer P, Martin D, Giacomini M, Purdy L (2000) Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. BMJ 321: 1316–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Singer P, McKie J, Kuhse H, Richardson J (1995) Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation. Journal of Medical Ethics 21:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Smith R (1999) NICE: a panacea for the NHS? BMJ 318: 823–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ubel P (1999) Pricing life: Cost-effectiveness in health care rationing. MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wagstaff A (1991) QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. Journal of Health Economics 10:21–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Williams A (1985) Economics of coronary artery by pass grafting. BMJ 291:326–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Williams A (1996) QALYS and ethics: a health economist’s perspective. Social Science and Medicine 43:1795–804PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ole F. Norheim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations