Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zwang und Autonomie bei psychischer Krankheit

Ein Dilemma für die Betroffenen und die Gesellschaft

  • Chapter
Psychiatrie zwischen Autonomie und Zwang

  • 1216 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Helmchen H. Die Deklaration von Madrid 1996. Nervenarzt 1998; 69(454):455

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steinert T, Hinuber W, Arenz D, Rottgers HR, Biller N, Gebhardt RP. Ethische Konflikte bei der Zwangsbehandlung schizophrener Patienten. Nervenarzt 2001; 72(9):700–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyer G. On the justification for civil commitment. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2000; 399:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Livermore JM, Malmquist CP. On the justification of civil commitment. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1968; 117(75):96

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hoge SK, Monahan J, Eisenberg MM, Bennett NS et al. Patients’ revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalization. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156(9):1385–1391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salize HJ, Dressing H. Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184:163–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frick U, Rüesch P, Neuenschwander M, Rössler W. Unfreiwillige psychiatrische Hospitalisierungen im Kanton Zürich 1995 bis 2001: wieviel? wer? wie? Mit welchem Ergebnis? Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie 2003; 154:116–126

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riecher A, Rössler W, Löffler W, Fätkenheuer B. Factors influencing compulsory admission of psychiatric patients. Psychol Med 1991; 21(1):197–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaltiala-Heino R, Laippala P, Salokangas RK. Impact of coercion on treatment outcome. Int J Law Psychiatry 1997; 20(3):311–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kjellin L, Nilstun T. Medical and social paternalism. Regulation of and attitudes towards compulsory psychiatric care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 88(6):415–419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ledwidge B, Glackman W, Paredes J, Chen R, Dhami S, Hansen M et al. Controlled follow-up of patients released by a review panel at one and two years after separation. Can J Psychiatry 1987; 32(6):448–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McGlashan TH, Heinssen RK. Hospital discharge status and long-term outcome for patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, borderline personality disorder, and unipolar affective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45(4):363–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swanson JW, Swartz MS, Elbogen EB, Wagner HR, Burns BJ. Effects of involuntary outpatient commitment on subjective quality of life in persons with severe mental illness. Behav Sci Law 2003; 21(4):473–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rain SD, Williams VF, Robbins PC, Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Vesselinov R. Perceived coercion at hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(1):103–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wertz DC, Rosenfield JM, Janes SR, Erbe RW. Attitudes toward abortion among parents of children with cystic fibrosis. Am J Public Health 1991; 81(8):992–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sujansky E, Kreutzer SB, Johnson AM, Lezotte DC, Schrier RW, Gabow PA. Attitudes of at-risk and affected individuals regarding presymptomatic testing for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Am J Med Genet 1990; 35(4):510–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lauber C, Falcato L, Rossler W. Attitudes to compulsory admission in psychiatry. Lancet 2000; 355(9220):2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinert T, Schmid P. Effect of voluntariness of participation in treatment on short-term outcome of inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55(7):786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinert T, Schmid P. [Voluntariness and coercion in patients with schizophrenia]. Psychiatr Prax 2004; 31(1):28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McGorry PD, Chanen A, McCarthy E, Van Riel R, McKenzie D, Singh BS. Posttraumatic stress disorder following recent-onset psychosis. An unrecognized postpsychotic syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis 1991; 179(5):253–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Längle G, Mayenberger M. Die Rolle der Klinik im Verlaufe schizophrener Erkrankungen. Gesundheitswesen 2000; 62(1):9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Trippitelli CL, Jamison KR, Folstein MF, Bartko JJ, DePaulo JR. Pilot study on patients’ and spouses’ attitudes toward potential genetic testing for bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155(7):899–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith LB, Sapers B, Reus VI, Freimer NB. Attitudes towards bipolar disorder and predictive genetic testing among patients and providers. J Med Genet 1996; 33(7):544–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Steinert T, Hinüber W, Arenz D, Rottgers HR, Biller N, Gebhardt RP. Ethische Konflikte bei der Zwangsbehandlung schizophrener Patienten. Nervenarzt 2001; 72(9):700–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lauber C, Nordt C, Sartorius N, Falcato L, Rössler W. Public acceptance of restrictions on mentally ill people. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2000; (407):26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zogg H, Lauber C, Ajdacic-Gross V, Rössler W. Einstellung von Experten und Laien gegenüber negativen Sanktionen bei psychisch Kranken. Psychiatr Prax 2003; 30(7):379–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lepping P, Steinert T, Gebhardt RP, Rottgers HR. Attitudes of mental health professionals and lay-people towards involuntary admission and treatment in England and Germany — a questionnaire analysis. Eur Psychiatry 2004;19(2):91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kullgren G, Jacobsson L, Lynoe N, Kohn R, Levav I. Practices and attitudes among Swedish psychiatrists regarding the ethics of compulsory treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996; 93(5):389–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lauber C, Nordt C, Falcato L, Rössler W. Public attitude to compulsory admission of mentally ill people. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002; 105(5):385–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christoph Lauber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Lenggstraße 31, 8029, Zürich

    Wulf Rössler  & Paul Hoff  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lauber, C. (2005). Zwang und Autonomie bei psychischer Krankheit. In: Rössler, W., Hoff, P. (eds) Psychiatrie zwischen Autonomie und Zwang. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27089-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27089-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23400-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-27089-8

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation