Skip to main content

Measurement uncertainty and its implications for collaborative study method validation and method performance parameters

  • Chapter
Book cover Validation in Chemical Measurement

Abstract

ISO principles of measurement uncertainty estimation are compared with protocols for method development and validation by collaborative trial and concomitant “top-down” estimation of uncertainty. It is shown that there is substantial commonality between the two procedures. In particular, both require a careful consideration and study of the main effects on the result. Most of the information required to evaluate measurement uncertainty is therefore gathered during the method development and validation process. However, the information is not generally published in sufficient detail at present; recommendations are accordingly made for future reporting of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sargent M (1995) Anal Proc 32:201–202

    Google Scholar 

  2. ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN 92-67-10188-9

    Google Scholar 

  3. EURACHEM (1995) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London. ISBN 0-948926-08-2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Williams A (1991) Accred Qual Assur 1:14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horwitz W (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:331–343

    Google Scholar 

  6. AOAC recommendation (1989) J Assoc Off Anal Chem 72:694–704

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO (1994) ISO 5725: 1994 Precision of test methods. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  8. Analytical Methods Committee (1995) Analyst 120:2303–2308

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellison SLR, Williams A (1996) In: Parkany M (ed) The use of recovery factors in trace analysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fleming J (1995) Anal Proc 32:31–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellison, S.L., Williams, A. (2005). Measurement uncertainty and its implications for collaborative study method validation and method performance parameters. In: De Bièvre, P., Günzler, H. (eds) Validation in Chemical Measurement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27034-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics