Skip to main content

Individualizing Interventions for Cancer Prevention

  • Conference paper
Tumor Prevention and Genetics III

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 166))

  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

Many cancer prevention strategies are unlikely to provide equal risk reduction in all subjects, but instead are predicted to be particularly useful for specific individuals. An important research challenge is to devise methods for individualization of cancer prevention recommendations, such that particular interventions are assigned to those who will gain the most. Research in this area is at an early stage, but progress that allows rational assignment of specific prevention strategies to particular individuals who will benefit would decrease the cost, minimize the toxicity, and increase the efficacy of interventions intended to prevent cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al (2003) The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349: 215–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Daly M, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N (1998) Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1371–1388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King MC, Wieand S, Hale K, Lee M, Walsh T, Owens K, Tait J, Ford L, Dunn BK, Costantino J, Wickerham L, Wolmark N, Fisher B, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. JAMA 286:2251–2256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, Costa A, Sacchini V, Travaglini R, D’Aiuto G, Lovison F, Gucciardo G, Muraca MG, Pizzichetta MA, Conforti S, Decensi A, Robertson C, Boyle P, Tamoxifen Study Group (2003) Italian randomized trial among women with hysterectomy: tamoxifen and hormone-dependent breast cancer in high-risk women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:160–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Haile R (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87: 1622–1629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brisson J, Brisson B, Coté G, Maunsell E, Bérubé S, Robert J (2000) Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:911–915

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson C, Warren R, Bingham SA, Day NE (1999) Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:863–866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cauley JA, Lucas FL, Kuller LH, Vogt MT, Browner WS, Cummings SR (1996) Bone mineral density and risk of breast cancer in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group [see comments]. JAMA 276:1404–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Kiel DP, Kreger BE, Cupples LA, Ellison RC, Dorgan JF, Schatzkin A, Levy D, Felson DT (1997) Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women [see comments]. N Engl J Med 336: 611–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, Speizer FE (1998) Plasma sex steroid hormone levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1292–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deal C, Ma J, Wilkin F, Paquette J, Rozen F, Ge B, Hudson T, Stampfer M, Pollak M (2001) Novel promoter polymorphism in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3: correlation with serum levels and interaction with known regulators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1274–1280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reichardt JK, Makridakis N, Henderson BE, Yu MC, Pike MC, Ross RK (1995) Genetic variability of the human SRD5A2 gene: implications for prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res 55:3973–3975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollak M, Costantino J, Polychronakos C, Blauer S, Guyda H, Redmond C, Fisher B, Margolese R (1990) Effect of tamoxifen on serum insulin-like growth factor I levels in stage I breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1693–1697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Torrisi R, Mezzetti M, Johansson H, Barreca A, Pigatto F, Robertson C, Decensi A (2000) Time course of fenretinide-induced modulation of circulating insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 in a bladder cancer chemoprevention trial. Int J Cancer 87: 601–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Novelli G, Margiotti K, Sangiuolo F, Reichardt JK (2001) Pharmacogenetics of human androgens and prostatic diseases. Pharmacogenomics 2:65–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Costantino JP (2001) Benefit/risk assessment of SERM therapy: clinical trial versus clinical practice settings. Ann N YAcad Sci 949: 280–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen CJ, Dimai HP, Vereault D, Donahue LR, Beamer WG, Farley J, Linkhart S, Linkhart T, Mohan S, Baylink DJ (1997) Circulating and skeletal insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1) concentrations in two inbred strains of mice with different bone mineral densities. Bone 21: 217–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Michaud DS, Deroo B, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Pollak M (1998) Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet 351:1393–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pollak M, Blouin MJ, Zhang JC, Kopchick JJ (2001) Reduced mammary gland carcinogenesis in transgenic mice expressing a growth hormone antagonist. Br J Cancer 85:428–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollak M, Foulkes WD (2003) Challenges to cancer control by screening. Nat Rev Cancer 3:297–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pollak, M. (2005). Individualizing Interventions for Cancer Prevention. In: Senn, HJ., Morant, R. (eds) Tumor Prevention and Genetics III. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 166. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26980-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26980-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22228-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26980-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics