Skip to main content

United Kingdom

An Explicit Model of Business-Society Relations

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalism. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. 1965. Modern British Politics. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. 1982. Britain Against Itself. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M., & Evans, T. 1978. Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner, R. H. 1988. American Philanthropy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T. 1994. Corporate Responsibility. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI. 1981. Company Responses to Unemployment: a Report by the Social Affairs Directorate. London: CSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane, P. 1969. The First Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie, M. 2001. American Foundations: An investigative history. Cambridge, Mass. & London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez Young, A., Moon, J., & Young, R. 2003. The UK Corporate Social Responsibility Consultancy Industry: a phenomenological approach. Nottingham: Research Paper Series of the International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, No.14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. 1984. The Business Lobby: Political Attitudes and Strategy. In: H. Berrington (Ed.), Change in British Politics. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. 1993. Business and Politics in the UK. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W., & Marsh, D. 1977. The CBI. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. 1973. Ideas, Institutions and the policies of Governments: A Comparative Analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 3: 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, L., Solomon, A., & Solomon, J. 2003. Explaining the Growth in UK Socially Responsible Investment. Journal of General Management, 24: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignon, I., & Ralston, D. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 3497–3514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels F. 1970. The Communist Manifesto in Marx and Engels Selected Works. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, P. 1983. The First Industrial Nation. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. 2002a. Business Social Responsibility and New Governance. Government and Opposition, 37: 3385–3408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. 2002b. Corporate Social Responsibility: An Overview. International Directory of Corporate Philanthropy. London: Europa Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Richardson, J. J. 1985. Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies. Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Richardson, J. J. 1993. Governmental Capacity Regained?: The Challenges to and Responses of British Government in the 1980s. In: I. Marsh (Ed.), Governing in the 1990s: Challenges, Constraints, and Opportunities. Sydney, Australia: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., & Richardson, J. J., in association with Moon, J. (1989). Local Partnership and the Unemployment Crisis in Britain. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. 1996. Shouldn’t Row, Can’t Steer: What’s a Government to Do? Public Policy and Administration, 12: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M. 1982. The Social Policy of the Firm. Policy Sciences, 14: 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A.W. 1996. New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. 1983. The Development of Corporate Responsibility in the UK. Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, No.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 1976. On the Priorities of Government: A Developmental Analysis of Public Policies. European Journal of Political Research, 4: 247–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. 1985. The Programme Approach to the Growth of Government. British Journal of Political Science, 15: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. 1970. England in the Nineteenth Century. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. 1966. Democracy in America. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, NY & London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moon, J. (2005). United Kingdom. In: Habisch, A., Wegner, M., Schmidpeter, R., Jonker, J. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26960-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics