Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Biais, B., & Perotti, E. 2002. Machiavellian Privatization. American Economic Review, 92(1): 240–258.
Bradley, M. et al. 1999. The Purposes and Accountability of the Corporation in Contemporary Society: Corporate Governance at a Crossroads. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(3): 24.
Cha, A. E. 2003. Microsoft’s Big Role on Campus: Donations Fund Research, Build Long-Term Connections. Washington Post, August 25: 01.
Dewenter, K. L., & Malatesta, P. H. 1997. Public Offerings of State-Owned and Privately-Owned Enterprises: An International Comparison. Journal of Finance, 52(4): 1659–1679.
Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: EU Commission.
Jenkins, H., & Hines, F. 2003. Shouldering the Burden of Corporate Social Responsibility: What Makes Business Get Committed? Cardiff: Working Paper Series, No. 4, BRASS, Cardiff University.
Kaminski, B. 1999. Hungary’s Integration into European Union Markets. Washington: Policy Research Working Paper Series. The World Bank Development Research Group Trade.
Keeley, M. 1988. A Social-Contract Theory of Organization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shearer, A. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471–517.
Lodge, G. C. 1975. The New American Ideology, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
McGee, R. W., & Preobragenskaya, G. G. 2004. Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: The Theory and Practice of Corporate Governance in Eastern Europe. Presentation at the Global Conference on Business Economics, Association for Business and Economics Research, Amsterdam.
Mallin, C., & Jelic, R. 2000. Developments in Corporate Governance in Central and Eastern Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(1): 43–51.
Melé, D., & Garriga, E. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics. Special Issue (forthcoming).
HVG. 2004. Milliárdos állami támogatások: Kiváltáságosok klubja. June 19: 111–113.
Nader, R., & Green, M. J. 1973. The Case for Federal Charters. Nation. Feb. 5: 173.
Osterman, P. 2000. Work Organization in an Era of Restructuring: Trends in Diffusion and Impacts on Employee Welfare. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 53: 179–96.
Roland, G., & Verdier, T. 1994. Privatization in Eastern Europe: Irreversibility and Critical Mass Effects. Journal of Public Economics, 54(2): 161–183.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737–83.
Spence, L. J. 1999. Does size matter: The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3): 163–174.
Szonda Ipsos. 2003. Survey: Corporate Social Responsibility in Hungary. Budapest: Szonda Ipsos.
VIP. 2003. European Private Company Data: AMADEUS and Business Browser Compared. December, Issue 1.
World Bank & International Monetary Fund (Eds.). 2003. Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes, Corporate Governance Country Assessment: Hungary, 2003. Washington, DC: World Bank & International Monetary Fund.
Zysman, J., & Schwartz, A. (Eds.) 1998. Enlarging Europe: The Industrial Foundations of a New Political Reality. Berkeley: University of California.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fekete, L. (2005). Hungary. In: Habisch, A., Wegner, M., Schmidpeter, R., Jonker, J. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility Across Europe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26960-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26960-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23251-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26960-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)