Skip to main content

Crossover Adjustment of New Zealand Marine Gravity Data, and Comparisons with Satellite Altimetry and Global Geopotential Models

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 129))

Abstract

This paper summarises the crossover adjustment of approximately 90,000-line-km of ship-track gravity observations around New Zealand. The adjustment reduced the standard deviation of the ∼106 crossovers from ∼2.0 mgal to ∼0.3 mgal. These data were then used to assess four different grids of satellite-altimeter-derived gravity anomalies. The KMS02 altimeter grid was selected for use around New Zealand as it gave a better fit to the coastal ship-track data. Least-squares collocation was then used to ‘drape’ the altimetry onto the crossover-adjusted ship-tracks to counter the well-known problems with satellite altimeter data near the coast. The precision of this merged ship-altimeter gravity dataset is estimated to be 3.5 mgal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Trimmer R (2004) Improving high-resolution altimetric gravity field mapping (KMS02). Proc IUGG General Assembly, Sapporo, Japan 2003, Springer, Berlin, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen P (2000) The role of satellite altimetry in gravity field modelling in coastal areas, Phys Chem. Earth 25(1): 17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett J (2004) Marine gravity crossover adjustment for New Zealand, Report to Land Information New Zealand, Intrepid Geophysics, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng XL, Featherstone WE, Hwang C (2002) Estimation of contamination of ERS-2 and Poseidon satellite radar altimetry close to the coasts of Australia, Marine Geodesy 25(4): 249–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denker H, Roland M (2004) Compilation and evaluation of a consistent marine gravity data set surrounding Europe., Proc IUGG General Assembly, Sapporo, Japan 2003, Springer, Berlin, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone WE (2003) Comparison of different satellite altimeter-derived gravity anomaly grids with ship-borne gravity data around Australia, in: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid 2002, Dept of Surv & Geodesy, Aristotle Univ of Thessaloniki, pp.326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C, Hsu H-Y, Jang R-J (2002) Global mean sea surface and marine gravity anomaly from multi-satellite altimetry: applications of deflection-geoid and inverse Vening Meinesz formulae, J Geod 76(8): 407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor RG, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96, NASA Tech rep NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz H (1980) Geodetic reference system 1980, Bull Geod 54(4): 395–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT, Smith WHF (1997) Marine gravity anomaly from GEOSAT and ERS 1 satellite altimetry, J Geophys Res 102(B5): 10039–10054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strykowski G, Forsberg R (1998) Operational merging of satellite airborne and surface gravity data by draping techniques. in: Forsberg R, Feissl M, Dietrich R (eds) Geodesy on the Move, Springer, Berlin, 207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber Ch (2004) the gravity recovery and climate experiment: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31, L09607: doi 10.1029/2004GL019920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC, Forsberg R, Knudsen P (1992) The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. in: Holota P, Vermeer M (eds.) Proc 1st Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Prague, May, ISBN 80-901319-2-1, pp. 327–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM (2001) GSFC00 mean sea surface, gravity anomaly, and vertical gravity gradient from satellite altimeter data. J Geophys Res 106(C12): 31167–31174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Watts AB (1988) On the accuracy of marine gravity measurements, J Geophys Res 94(B4): 7685–7729

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amos, M., Featherstone, W., Brett, J. (2005). Crossover Adjustment of New Zealand Marine Gravity Data, and Comparisons with Satellite Altimetry and Global Geopotential Models. In: Jekeli, C., Bastos, L., Fernandes, J. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics