Advertisement

Spectral Analysis of Mean Dynamic Ocean Topography From the GRACE GGM01 Geoid

  • Zizhan Zhang
  • Yang Lu
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 129)

Abstract

With the development of the satellite gravity missions and the satellite altimetry missions, there have been recent improvements in geoid models and sea surface height (SSH) models, so now one can compute more accurate dynamic ocean topography (DOT). In this study, we computed a new mean DOT using a new geoid model (GGM01C) from GRACE and an improved mean SSH model (KMSS04) from a decade of multi-satellite altimetry. And DOT is computed using the GGM01C and EGM96 model to access the improvements and differences between these two geoid models. We find that the DOT is composed of long waves mainly, medium waves partially and short waves scarcely, and that the zonal spectrum of the DOT is different from its meridional spectrum. The differences in the DOTs from GGM01C and EGM96 in the test area indicate that great differences exist in these two gravity models, at least in equatorial area.

Key words

Mean dynamic ocean topography GGM01 fast Fourier transform wavelet analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andritsanos, V. D., M. G. Sideris and I. N. Tziavos (2001). Quasi-stationary Sea Surface Topography Estimation by the Multiple Input/output Method. Journal of Geodesy, Vol.75: 216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cadzow, J. A., and K. Ogino (1981), Two dimensional spectral estimation, IEEE Trans., ASSP, 29:396–401Google Scholar
  3. CHRISTOPHER KOTSAKIS. Can We Filter Non-stationary Noise From Geodetic Data With Fast Spectral (FFT) Techniques? Bulletin of the International Geoid Service, 2001, No. 11, pp. 93–114Google Scholar
  4. Glenn, S. M., D. L. Porter and A. R. Robinson (1991). A Synthetic Geoid Validation of Geosat Mesoscale Dynamic Topography in the Gulf Stream Region. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 7145–7166.Google Scholar
  5. Hou Zunze (2001). Wavelet Transform and Its Application to Decomposition of Gravity Anomalies. WAA 201,LNCS 2251, pp. 404–410, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. Knudsen, P., and O. B. Andersen (1997), Global Marine Gravity and Mean Sea Surface From Multimission Satellite Altimetry, in “Geodesy on the Move, Gravity, geoid, geodynamics and Antarctica”, Proceedings IAG scientific assembly, Rio de Janeiro, sep.3–9, Eds, Forsberg, Feissel and Dietrich., IAG symposia, 119, 132–138, Springer, Berlin, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Ichikawa, K., S. Imawaki, and H. Ishii (1995). Comparison of surface velocities determined from altimeter and drifting buoy data. Journal of Oceanography, 51, 729–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levitus, S. (1982). Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean NOAA, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Professional Paper 13, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  9. Levitus, S., R. Burgett, and T. P. Boyer (1994). World ocean atlas 1994 vol. 3: Salinity NOAA Atlas NESDIS 3, 99 pp. National Ocean and Atmosphere Administration USA.Google Scholar
  10. Li Jiancheng (1993). The Spectral Methods in Physical Geodesy (in Chinese). Wuhan: Wuhan technical university of surveying and mapping. 25–27Google Scholar
  11. Liu Changjian, Han Chunhao (2004). Instant Sea Level Model and Its Application in Positioning with Earth-synchronous Satellite (in Chinese). 9–16Google Scholar
  12. Osman N. U., Serhat Seker, A. Muhittin Albora, and Atilla Ozmen (2000). Separation of Magnetic Fields in Geophysical Studies Using a 2-D Multi-resolution Wavelet Analysis Approach. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society, Vol. 3, No 3, p. 53–58Google Scholar
  13. Tapley, B. D., D. P. Chambers, S. Bettadpur, and J. C. Ries (2003). Large-scale Ocean Circulation From the GRACE GGM01 Geoid. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.30, No.22, 2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Uchida, H., S. Imawaki, and J. H. Hu (1998). Comparison of Kuroshio surface velocities derived from satellite altimetry and drifting buoy data. Journal of Oceanography, 54, 115–122.Google Scholar
  15. Ole B. Andersen, Anne L. Vest and P. Knudsen (2004). Mean sea surface determination and inter-annual ocean variability. Observing and Understanding Sea Level Variations, p.38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zizhan Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yang Lu
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Geodesy and GeophysicsChinese Academy of ScienceWuhanChina
  2. 2.The Graduate of School of the Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Unite Center for Astro-geodynamics ResearchShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations