Abstract
In satellite gradiometry, the gravitational signals originating from the Earth’s topography and its isostatic compensation can be recognized in the gravity gradients observed along the satellite orbit. One general task should be the reduction of these effects to produce a smooth gravity field suitable for downward continuation. Based on different isostatic models such as the Airy-Heiskanen model, the Pratt-Hayford model, the combination of the Airy-Heiskanen model (land area) and the Pratt-Hayford model (ocean area), and the generalized Helmert model, the topographic-isostatic effects are calculated for a GOCE-like satellite orbit. For the second vertical (radial) derivative of the gravitational potential the order of magnitude of both topographic and isostatic components amounts to about 10 E.U. while the combined topographic-isostatic effect reduces to about 1 E.U.. In this paper, the focus lies on the comparison between the classical isostatic models and the generalized Helmert model, consistently using a rigorous spherical formulation for all models. By variation of the depth of the condensation layer, it is possible to demonstrate that the classical isostatic models become equivalent to the Helmert model related to a specific condensation depth d. E.g., the standard Airy-Heiskanen model related to a normal crustal thickness T = 25 km is best approximated using the compensation depth d = 24 km in the generalized Helmert model. Instead of the conventional remove-restore techniques which lead to high numerical efforts, the use of the generalized Helmert model is recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Heck B (2002) On the use and abuse of Helmert’s second method of condensation. In: Àdam J, Schwarz KP (eds) Vistas for Geodesy in the new millenium. Springer IAG Symposia, Vol. 125
Heck B, Wild F (2004) Topographic-isostatic reductions in satellite gravity gradiometry based on a generalized condensation model, In: Sansò F (ed) Proceedings of IAG General Assembly, Sapporo 2003, Springer IAG Symposia, (in print)
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical Geodesy. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1967
Helmert FR (1884) Die mathematischen und physikalischen Theorieen der Höheren Geodäsie. II. Teil: Die physikalischen Theorien, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig (reprinted 1962)
Kuhn M (2003) Geoid determination with density hypothesis from isostatic models and geological information. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 77, 50–65
Moritz H (1990) The figure of the earth. Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, 1990
Tsoulis D (1999) Analytical and numerical methods in gravity field modelling of ideal and real masses. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Series C, No. 510
Wild F, Heck B (2004) Effects of topographic and isostatic masses in satellite gravity gradiometry, Proc. Second International GOCE User Workshop “GOCE, The Geoid and Oceanography”, ESA-ESRIN, Frascati, Italy, 8–10 March 2004 (ESA SP-569, June 2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wild, F., Heck, B. (2005). A comparison of different isostatic models applied to satellite gravity gradiometry. In: Jekeli, C., Bastos, L., Fernandes, J. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26930-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26932-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)