A new strategy for processing airborne gravity data

  • B.A. Alberts
  • R. Klees
  • P. Ditmar
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 129)


We present a new approach for regional gravity field analysis from airborne gravity data, which combines separate processing steps into one inversion scheme. The approach uses a spectral representation of the Earth’s gravity field in terms of a series of harmonic base functions, expressed in a local Cartesian reference frame. The parameters of this representation are estimated using least-squares techniques. Special emphasis is put on the proper modeling of data noise. Frequency-dependent data weighting is applied to handle colored noise, which replaces the traditional method of low-pass filtering and crossover adjustment. To suppress model errors at the highest spatial frequencies, first-order Tikhonov regularization is applied. The performance of the developed technique is assessed for the inversion of gravity disturbances into the disturbing potential, using simulated data.


Airborne gravimetry airborne gravity data processing regional gravity field analysis frequency-dependent weighting 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alberts B, Klees R (2004) A comparison of methods for the inversion of airborne gravity data. J Geodesy 78: 55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1991) Time series: theory and methods. Second edition. Springer Series in Statistics, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Childers VA, Bell RE, Brozena JM (1999) Airborne gravimetry: An investigation of filtering. Geophysics 64(1): 61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ditmar P, Klees R (2002) A method to compute the Earth’s gravity field from SGG/SST data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite. Delft University Press (DUP) Science, DelftGoogle Scholar
  5. Ditmar P, Kusche J, Klees R (2003) Computation of spherical harmonic coefficients from gravity gradiometry to be acquired by the GOCE satellite: regularization issues. J Geodesy 77: 465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glennie C, Schwarz KP (1997) Airborne Gravity by Strap-down INS/DGPS in a 100 km by 100 km Area of the Rocky Mountains. Proc Int Symp Kinematic Systems in Geodesy, Geomatics and Navigation (KIS97), June 3–6, Banff, Canada, pp 619–624Google Scholar
  7. Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21: 215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hansen P, O’Leary DP (1993) The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput l4: 1487–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klees R, Broersen P (2002) How to handle colored noise in large least-squares problems-Building the optimal filter. Delft University Press (DUP) Science, DelftGoogle Scholar
  10. Klees R, Ditmar P (2004) How to handle colored noise in large least-squares problems in the presence of data gaps. Sansó F (ed.), Proc Vth Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, June 17–21 2002, Matera, Italy, pp 39–48Google Scholar
  11. Klees R, Ditmar P, Broersen P (2003) How to handle colored observation noise in large least-squares problems. J Geodesy 76: 629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koch KR (1990) Bayesian inference with geodetic applications. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Wenzel G (1998) Ultra high degree geopotential models GPM98A, B and C to degree 1800. Proc Joint Meeting International Gravity Commission and International Geoid Commission, 7–12 September 1998, Trieste, ItalyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.A. Alberts
    • 1
  • R. Klees
    • 1
  • P. Ditmar
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft Institute of Earth Observation and Space Systems (DEOS)Delft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations