Skip to main content

Global Gravity Field Solutions Based on a Simulation Scenario of GRACE SST Data and Regional Refinements by GOCE SGG Observations

  • Conference paper
Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 129))

Abstract

GOCE (Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer) has the potential of deriving the global gravity field with unprecedented accuracy in the high resolution spectral part. The usual way is to model the gravity field by spherical harmonics up to a degree limited by the numerical stability of the recovery procedure. A disadvantage of this kind of gravity field representation is the lack of flexibility in modeling the inhomogeneous gravity field of regions with variable rough gravity field features. An alternative approach is to determine a global gravity field solution with high long and medium wavelength accuracy, e.g. based on GRACE SST observations up to a moderate degree, and improve this global solution in regions with characteristic gravity field features by an adapted regional recovery procedure. The individual gravity field features in these regions can be modeled by space localizing base functions like spherical spline functions. The advantage of this method is the possibility of adjusting the spline representation and the recovery procedure according to the regional gravity field structures and the specific data distribution. As a first indicator of a rough gravity field the structure of the topography or geophysical apriori information can be used as a criterium. The resolution of the regional gravity field can be further improved by a subsequent iteration step. If neccessary, several regional solutions with global coverage can be merged by means of quadrature methods to obtain a global solution. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate this approach. Due to the regionally adapted recovery strategies this method provides better results than calculating a spherical harmonics solution by recovering the potential coefficients directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • European Space Agency (1999) Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer Mission (GOCE). Report for mission selection, in The four candidate Earth explorer core missions, SP-1233 (1), Nordwijk, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive Approximation on the Sphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilk KH, Feuchtinger M, Mayer-Guerr T (2003) Gravity Field Recovery and Validation by Analysis of Short Arcs of a Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking Experiment as CHAMP and GRACE, accepted for publication in the IAG proceedings of the General Assembly of the IUGG 2003, Sapporo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR, Kusche J (2001) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. Journal of Geodesy 76(5):259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chirm DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Grenbelt, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Guerr T, Ilk KH, Eicker A (2003) Regional Gravity Field Recovery from GOCE Gradiometer Measurements and SST-high-low Observations — a Simulation Study. Proceedings of the 1 st Workshop on International Gravity Field Research 2003, Graz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneeuw N (1994) Global Spherical Harmonic Analysis by Least Squares and Numerical Quadrature Methods in Historical Perspective. Geophys. J. Int., 118: 707–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud AH, Secrest D (1966) Gaussian Quadrature Formulas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Watkins M, Reigber C (2004) The gravity recovery and climate experimant: mission overview and early results. Geophys Res Lett 31, L09607: doil0.1029/2004GL019920.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eicker, A., Mayer-Guerr, T., Ilk, K. (2005). Global Gravity Field Solutions Based on a Simulation Scenario of GRACE SST Data and Regional Refinements by GOCE SGG Observations. In: Jekeli, C., Bastos, L., Fernandes, J. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 129. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26932-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics