Skip to main content

Representing, Manipulating and Reasoning with Geographic Semantics within a Knowledge Framework

  • Conference paper

Abstract

This paper describes a programmatic framework for representing, manipulating and reasoning with geographic semantics. The framework enables automating tool selection for user defined geographic problem solving, and evaluating semantic change in knowledge discovery environments. Methods, data, and human experts (our resources) uses, inputs, outputs, and semantic changes are described using ontologies. These ontological descriptions are manipulated by an expert system to select resources to solve a user-defined problem. A semantic description of the problem is compared to the services that each entity can provide to construct a graph of potential solutions. An optimal (least cost) solution is extracted from these solutions, and displayed in real-time. The semantic change(s) resulting from the interaction of resources within the optimal solution are determined via expressions of transformation semantics represented within the Java Expert System Shell. This description represents the formation history of each new information product (e.g. a map or overlay) and can be stored, indexed and searched as required. Examples are presented to show (1) the construction and visualization of information products, (2) the reasoning capabilities of the system to find alternative ways to produce information products from a set of data methods and expertise, given certain constraints and (3) the representation of the ensuing semantic changes by which an information product is synthesized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abel, D.J., Taylor, K., Ackland, R., and Hungerford, S. 1998, An Exploration of GIS Architectures for Internet Environments. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 22(1) pp 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, J., 1994. Universal elementary GIS tasks-beyond low-level commands. In Waugh T C and Healey R G (eds) Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling: 209–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishr, Y., 1997. Semantic aspects of interoperable GIS. Ph.D Dissertation Thesis, Enschede, The Netherlands, 154 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishr, Y., 1998. Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(4): 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodaric, B. and Gahegan, M., 2002. Distinguishing Instances and Evidence of Geographical Concepts for Geospatial Database Design. In: M.J. Egenhofer and D.M. Mark (Editors), GIScience 2002. Lecture Notes in Computing Science 2478. Springer-Verlag, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J.R. and Benjamins, V.R., 1997. Ontology of Tasks and Methods, AAAI Spring Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, M., 2002. Toward the semantic geospatial web, Tenth ACM International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, McLean, Virginia, USA, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrikant, S.I. and Buttenfield, B.P., 2001. Formalizing Semantic Spaces for Information Access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2): 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Geographic Data Committee. FGDC-STD-001-1998. Content standard for digital geospatial metadata (revised June 1998). Federal Geographic Data Committee. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, F.T., 2001. Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, The University of Maine, 131 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, F.T., Egenhofer, M.J., Jr., C.A.D. and Borges, K.A.V., 2000. Ontologies and knowledge sharing in urban GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24: 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, F.T. and Egenhofer, M.J., 1999. Ontology-Driven Geographic Information Systems. In: C.B. Medeiros (Editor), 7th ACM Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Kansas City, MO, pp. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan, M., Takatsuka, M., Wheeler, M. and Hardisty, F., 2002. Introducing GeoVISTA Studio: an integrated suite of visualization and computational methods for exploration and knowledge construction in geography. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26: 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan, M. N. (1999). Characterizing the semantic content of geographic data, models, and systems. In Interoperating Geographic Information Systems (Eds. Goodchild, M.F., Egenhofer, M. J. Fegeas, R. and Kottman, C. A.). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan, M. N. (1996). Specifying the transformations within and between geographic data models. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., 1997a. Semantic Matching: Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction, and Integration. In: M.T. Pazienza (Editor), Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology. Springer Verlag, pp. 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N., 1997b. Understanding, building and using ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46: 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimpour, F. and Timpf, S., 2002. A Step towards GeoData Integration using Formal Ontologies. In: M. Ruiz, M. Gould and J. Ramon (Editors), 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, pp. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honda, K. and Mizoguchi, F., 1995. Constraint-based approach for automatic spatial layout planning. 11th conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Los Angeles, CA. p38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokla, M. and Kavouras, M., 2002. Theories of Concepts in Resolving Semantic Heterogeneities, 5th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Palma, Spain, pp. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, W., 2002. Modeling the Semantics of Geographic Categories through Conceptual Integration. In: M.J. Egenhofer and D.M. Mark (Editors), GIScience 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, A.M., in press. An evolving cognitive-semiotic approach to geographic visualization and knowledge construction. Information Design Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D., Egenhofer, M., Hirtle, S. and Smith, B., 2002. Ontological Foundations for Geographic Information Science. UCGIS Emerging Resource Theme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe R.T and Penny J.P. (1995) Constructing interfaces between (and within) geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9:p275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundt, H. and Bishr, Y., 2002. Domain ontologies for data sharing-an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., 2001. Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7): 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotnykova, A., 2001. Design and Implementation of Federation of Spatio-Temporal Databases: Methods and Tools, Centre de Recherche Public — Henri Tudor and Laboratoire de Bases de Donnees Database Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F., 2000, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations (USA: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. and Fauconnier, G., 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2): 133–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G. and Vogele, T., 2002. Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren, A.M., in press. An evolving cognitive-semiotic approach to geographic visualization and knowledge construction. Information Design Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D., Egenhofer, M., Hirtle, S. and Smith, B., 2002. Ontological Foundations for Geographic Information Science. UCGIS Emerging Resource Theme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe R.T and Penny J.P. (1995) Constructing interfaces between (and within) geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9:p275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundt, H. and Bishr, Y., 2002. Domain ontologies for data sharing-an example from environmental monitoring using field GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., 2001. Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(7):591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotnykova, A., 2001. Design and Implementation of Federation of Spatio-Temporal Databases: Methods and Tools, Centre de Recherche Public — Henri Tudor and Laboratoire de Bases de Donnees Database Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. F., 2000, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations (USA: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. and Fauconnier, G., 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2): 133–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G. and Vogele, T., 2002. Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers & Geosciences, 28: 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

O’Brien, J., Gahegan, M. (2005). Representing, Manipulating and Reasoning with Geographic Semantics within a Knowledge Framework. In: Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics