Sandbox Geography — To learn from children the form of spatial concepts
The theory theory claims that children’s acquisition of knowledge is based on forming and revising theories, similar to what scientists do (Gopnik and Meltzoff 2002). Recent findings in developmental psychology provide evidence for this hypothesis.
Children have concepts about space that differ from those of adults. During development these concepts undergo revisions.
This paper proposes the formalization of children’s theories of space in order to reach a better understanding on how to structure spatial knowledge. Formal models can help to make the structure of spatial knowledge more comprehensible and may give insights in how to build GIS. Selected examples for object appearances are modeled using an algebra. An Algebra Based Agent is presented and coded in a functional programming language as a simple computational model.
KeywordsTheory Theory Geographic Information System Object Permanence Core Knowledge Hide Object
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bird, R. (1998). Introduction to Functional Programming Using Haskell. Hemel Hempstead, UK, Prentice Hall Europe.Google Scholar
- Egenhofer, M. J. and D. M. Mark (1995). Naive Geography. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (COSIT ’95, Semmering, Austria). A. U. Frank and W. Kuhn, Springer Verlag. 988: 1–15.Google Scholar
- Ferber, J., Ed. (1998). Multi-Agent Systems — An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. A. (1987). The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Frank, A. U. (1999). One Step up the Abstraction Ladder: Combining Algebras — From Functional Pieces to a Whole. Spatial Information Theory — Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science (Int. Conference COSIT’99, Stade, Germany). C. Freksa and D. M. Mark. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 1661: 95–107.Google Scholar
- Frank, A. U. (2000). "Spatial Communication with Maps: Defining the Correctness of Maps Using a Multi-Agent Simulation." Spatial Cognition II: 80–99.Google Scholar
- Frank, A. U. (2001). "Tiers of ontology and consistency constraints in geographic information systems." International Journal of Geographical Information Science 75(5 (Special Issue on Ontology of Geographic Information)): 667–678.Google Scholar
- Gopnik, A. and A. N. Meltzoff (2002). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gopnik, A., A. N. Meltzoff, et al. (2001). The Scientist in the Crib — What early learning tells us about the mind. New York, Perennial — HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Hayes, P. (1985). The Second Naive Physics Manifesto. Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. J. R. Hobbs and R. C. Moore. Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation: 1–36.Google Scholar
- Hayes, P. J. (1978). The Naive Physics Manifesto. Expert Systems in the Microelectronic Age. D. Mitchie. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press: 242–270.Google Scholar
- Hobbs, J. and R. C. Moore, Eds. (1985). Formal Theories of the Commonsense World. Ablex Series in Artificial Intelligence. Norwood, NJ, Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
- Loeckx, J., H.-D. Ehrich, et al. (1996). Specification of Abstract Data Types. Chichester, UK and Stuttgart, John Wiley and B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
- Mark, D. M. and M. J. Egenhofer (1996). Common-Sense Geography: Foundations for Intuitive Geographic Information Systems. GIS/LIS ’96, Betsheda, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.Google Scholar
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive Theories of Motion. Mental Models. D. Genter and A. L. Stevens, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Newcombe, N. S. and J. Huttenlocher (2003). Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. and B. Inhelder (1999). Die Entwicklung des räumlichen Denkens beim Kinde. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J., B. Inhelder, et al. (1975). Die natürliche Geometrie des Kindes. Stuttgart, Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
- Pinker, S. (1995). The Language Instinct. New York, HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
- Raubal, M. (2001). Agent-based Simulation of Human Wayfinding: A Perceptual Model for Unfamiliar Buildings. Institute for Geoinformation. Vienna, Vienna University of Technology: 159.Google Scholar
- Russell, S. J. and P. Norvig (1995). Artificial Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. and D. M. Mark (2001). "Geographical categories: an ontological investigation." International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7 (Special Issue — Ontology in the Geographic Domain)): 591–612.Google Scholar
- Spelke, E. S. (2000). "Core Knowledge." American Psychologist November 2000: 1233–1243.Google Scholar
- Spelke, E. S. and G. S. Van de Walle (1993). Perceiving and reasoning about obects: insights from infants. Spatial representations: problems in philosphy and psychology. N. Eilan, R. McCarthy and B. Brewer. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Blackwell: 132–161.Google Scholar
- Weiss, G. (1999). Multi-Agent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press.Google Scholar