Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anselin, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 27:93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. 1980. Creating future geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70(4):449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butzer, K. 2002. The rising cost of contestation: Commentary/response to Turner’s “Contested Identities”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92:75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, E. 1972. Generating Models by the Expansion Method: Applications to Geographic Research. Geographical Analysis 4:81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, E. 1993. &quote;Spatial Analysis: Perspectives and Prospects.&quote; Urban Geography 14(6):526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, E. 1997. The Expansion Method, Mathematical Modeling, and Spatial Econometrics. International Regional Science Review 20:9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casetti E. 1999. The evolution of Scientific Disciplines, Mathematical Modeling and Human Geography. Geographical Analysis 31(4):332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Geosciences, Environment and Resources (CGER). 1997. Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and Society. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S. 1998. Position Paper: Stressing the Local. Workshop on the status and trends in spatial analysis, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S. 1997. Trends in Quantitative Methods, I: Stressing the Local. Progress in Human Geography 21: 88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S. 1994. Exploratory data analysis and GIS. Environment and Planning A 24:1675–1678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A. S. 1992. On the future of spatial analysis: the role of GIS. Environment and Planning A (Special Issue):30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C.F., and Charlton, M.E. 1999. Geographically Weighted Regression: A Natural Evolution of the Expansion Method for Spatial Data Analysis, Environment and Planning A 30: 1905–1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham, A.S. and Pitts, T. 1995. Directional variation in distance-decay. Environment and Planning A 27:715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P. and Casetti, E. 1992: Applications of the Expansion Method London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, E. and Jones, J.P. 1992. An introduction to the expansion method and to its applications. In Jones, J.P. and Casetti, E. Applications of the Expansion Method. London: Routledge, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, J. and Bierly, G. 2002. Weather & Voter Turnout: Kentucky Primary & General Elections, 1990–2000. Southeastern Geographer 42:114–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatrell, J., Bierly, G., and Beck, D. 2001. The politics of weather: Voter turnout in Kentucky, 1990–2000. Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conference 24:113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanham, R. 1992. Generating varying parameter models using cubic spline functions, In Jones, J.P. and Casetti, E. Applications of the Expansion Method. London: Routledge, pp.355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P. 1992. Paradigmatic dimensions of the expansion method. In Jones, J.P. and Casetti, E. Applications of the Expansion Method. London: Routledge, pp. 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J.P and Hanham, R. Q. 1995. Contingency, Realism, and the Expansion Method. Geographical Analysis 27:185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Stow, D. & Jones, J.P. 1992. Incorporating Spatially-Varying Parameters into Remote Sensing-Based Water Quality Mapping Procedures. In Jones, J.P. and Casetti, E. Applications of the Expansion Method. London: Routledge, pp. 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ocelli, S. 2001. “Facing urban complexity: towards cognitive modeling. Part 1. Modeling as a cognitive mediator.” Paper presented at the XII European Colloquium on Theoretical and Quantitative Geography, St.Valery-en-Caux, 7–11 September. {as posted on-line at http://www.cybergeo.presse.fr}.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2ed. London; Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L. 2002. Contested identities: Human-environment geography and disciplinary implications in a restructuring academy. Annals of Association of American Geographers 92:52–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gatrell, J.D. (2005). Modeling Human-Environment Interactions. In: Geo-Spatial Technologies in Urban Environments. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26676-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics