Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlations from Head to Toe pp 535–551Cite as

MRI and CT of the Female Pelvis

  • Chapter

  • 1929 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES et al (2002) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Sorensen JS et al (2002) Reproducibility of evaluation of the uterus by transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, hysteroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 17:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES et al (2001) Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonograhic examination and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 76:350–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hricak H, Kim BK (1993) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the female pelvis. JMRI 3:297–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katsumori T, Nakajima K, Tokuhiro M (2001) Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of uterine fibroids treated with uterine artery embolization. AJR 177:303–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamlin DJ, Petersson H, Fitzsimmons J Morgan LS (1985) MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas and their complications. JCAT 9:902–907

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L et al (1986) Uterine leiomyoma correlation by magnetic resonance imaging: clinical symptoms and histopathology. Radiology 158:385–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittl RL, Yeh I-T, Kressel HY (1991) High-signal-intensity rim surrounding uterine leiomyomas on MR images: pathologic correlation. Radiology 180:81–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Murase E, Siegelmann ES, Outwater EK et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis and treatment. Radiographics 1179–1197

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hricak H, Finck S, Honda G et al (1992) MR imaging in the evaluation of benign uterine masses: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced T1-weighted images. AJR 158:1043–1250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis AE, Bret PM (1995) Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology 197:609–614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siskin GP, Tublin ME, Stainken BF et al (2001) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: clinical response and evaluation with MR imaging. AJR 177:297–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itho K et al (1988) Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 166:111–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I et al (1989) Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171:531–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang S, Turner DA, Foster GS, Rapoport MI, Spencer SA, Wang J-Z (1996) Adenomyosis: specificity of 5 mm as the maximum normal uterine junctional zone thickness in MR images. AJR 166:1145–1150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martius G, Breckwoldt M, Pfleiderer A (1996) Lehrbuch der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SS, Lee L (1983) Retroperitoneal lymph node metastases in stage I carcinoma of the endometrium: correlation with risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 16:319–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DelMaschio A, Vanzulli A, Sironi S et al (1993) Estimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging. AJR 160:533–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamashita Y, Mizutani H, Torashima M et al (1993) Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR 161:595–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frei KA and Kinkel K (2001) Staging endometrial cancer: role of magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:850–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES et al (2000) Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 214:47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scoutt, LM, McCarthy SM, Flynn SD et al (1995) Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 194:567–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka R et al (1991) Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 181:95–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sironi S, Colombo E, Villa G et al (1992) Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 185:207–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H (1993) Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 186:495–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Savci G, Ozyaman T, Tutar M, Bilgin T, Erol O, Tuncel E (1998) Assessment of depth of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: comparison of T2-weighted SE and contrast-enhanced dynamic GRE MR imaging. Eur Radiol 8:218–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sironi S, DeCobelli F, Scarfone G et al (1993) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 188:797–801

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W et al (1996) Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging. Radiology 201:531–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheidler J, Heuck A, Wencke K, Kimmig R, Müller-Lisse U, Reiser M (1997) Parametrial invasion of cervical cancer: value of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted SE-sequences at 1.5 Tesla. Fortschr Röntgenstr 166:312–316

    Google Scholar 

  30. Scheidler J, Heuck AF, Steinborn M, Kimmig R, Reiser MF (1998) Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. Radiology 206:125–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Loncaster JA, Carrington BM, Sykes JR et al (2002) Prediction of radiotherapy outcome using dynamic contrast MRI of carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:759–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohara K, Tanaka Y, Tsunoda H, Nishida M, Sugahara S, Itai Y (2002) Assessment of cervical cancer radioresponse by serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 100:781–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sironi S, Belloni C, Taccagni GL, DelMaschio A (1991) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement. AJR 156:753–756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zaloudek C (1994) The ovary. In: Compel C, Silverberg SG (eds) Pathology in gynecology and obstetrics, Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 313–413

    Google Scholar 

  35. Outwater EK, Duntion CJ (1995) Imaging of the ovary and adnexa. Clinical issues and applications of MR imaging. Radiology 194:1–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gross B, Moss A, Mihara K, Goldberg H, Glazer G (1983) Computed tomography of gynecologic diseases. Am J Roentgenol 141:765–773

    Google Scholar 

  37. Weström L, Bengston LO, Mardh PA (1976) The risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in women using intrauterine contraceptive devices compared to non-users. Lancet 2:221–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hirsch HA (1978) Die akute Salpingitis: Pathogenese, Aetiologie, Diagnose und Prognose. Gynäkologe 11:176–184

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wulf KH, Schmidt-Matthiesen H (1988) Gutartige gynäkologische Erkrankungen I. In: Klinik der Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Mestwerdt W (ed) Urban und Schwarzenberg, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  40. Berland L, Lawson T, Foley D, Albarelli J (1982) Ultrasound evaluation of pelvic infections. Radiol Clin North Am 20:367–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilbur A (1992) Computed tomography of tuboovarian abscesses. J Comp Assist Tomogr 14:625–628

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wilbur A, Aizenstein R, Napp T (1992) CT findings in tuboo-varian abscess. Am J Roentgenol 159:575–579

    Google Scholar 

  43. Huch Böni RA, Haldeman Heusler R, Hebisch G, Krestin GP (1994) CT und MRT bei Entzündungen der weiblichen Genitalorgane. Radiologe 34:390–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mitchell D, Mintz M, Spritzer Ch, Gussman D, Arger P, Coleman B, Axel L, Kressel H (1987) Adnexal masses: MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US and CT correlation. Radiology 162:319–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hricak H, Carrington B (1991) MRI of the pelvis. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Cologne, pp 43–249

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mawhinney RR, Powell MC, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of benign ovarian masses. Br J Radiol 723: 179–186

    Google Scholar 

  47. Einhorn W, Nilsson B, Stovall K (1985) Factors influencing survival in carcinoma of the ovary. Cancer 55:2015–2019

    Google Scholar 

  48. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T, Montgomery S (1994) Cancer statistics, 1994. CA Cancer J Clin 44:7–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y et al (1995) Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 194:557–565

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Komatsu T, Konishi I, Mandai M, Togashi K, Kawakami S, Konishi J, Mori T (1996) Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology 198: 109–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith FW, Cherryman GR, Bayliss AP et al (1988) Comparative study of the accuracy of ultrasound imaging, X-ray computerized tomography and low field MRI diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Magn Reson Imaging 6:225–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ghossain MA, Buy JN, Ligneres C et al (1991) Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings. Radiology 181:863–870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stevens SK, Hricak H, Campos Z (1993) Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: differentiation with proton-selective fat-saturation MR imaging. Radiology 186:481–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Huber S, Medl M, Baumann L, Czembirek H (2002) Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Anticancer Res 22:2501–2507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kubik-Huch RA, Dorffler W, von Schulthess GK et al (2000) Value of (18F)-FDG positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Eur Radiol 10:761–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ascher SM, Outwater EK, Reinhold C (1997). Adnexa. In: Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C (eds) MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 661–716

    Google Scholar 

  57. Low RN, Carter WD, Saleh F, Sigeti JS (1995) Ovarian cancer: comparison of findings with perfluorocarbon-enhanced MR imaging, In-111-CYT-103 immunoscintigraphy, and CT. Radiology 195:391–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Low RN, Sigeti JS (1994) MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging. Am J Roentgenol 163:1131–1140

    Google Scholar 

  59. Low RN, Barone RM, Lacey C, Sigeti JS, Alzate GD, Sebrechts CP (1997) Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Radiology 204:513–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stevens SK, Hricak H, Stern JL (1991) Ovarian lesions: detection and characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 181:481–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Semelka RC, Lawrence PH, Shoenut JP, Heywood M, Kroeker MA, Lotocki R (1993) Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre-and postcontrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging with histologic correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:99–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Bernd Hamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rahel A. Kubik-Huch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia Kluner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Heraklion, P.O. Box 1352, Stavrakia Heraklion Crete, 71110, Greece

    Nicholas C. Gourtsoyiannis M.D.

  2. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Pablo R. Ros M.D., MPH (Professor of Radiology) (Professor of Radiology)

  3. Harvard Medical School, USA

    Pablo R. Ros M.D., MPH (Professor of Radiology) (Professor of Radiology)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamm, B., Kubik-Huch, R.A., Kluner, C. (2005). MRI and CT of the Female Pelvis. In: Gourtsoyiannis, N.C., Ros, P.R. (eds) Radiologic-Pathologic Correlations from Head to Toe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26664-X_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26664-X_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-04395-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26664-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation