Bacterial Spores Survive Simulated Meteorite Impact

  • Gerda Horneck
Part of the Impact Studies book series (IMPACTSTUD)


Lithopanspermia, i.e., the hypothesis of viable transport of microorganisms between the terrestrial planets by means of meteorites, requires that microorganisms, embedded in rocks, have to cope with three major steps: (i) escape from the planet by impact ejection, (ii) journey through space over extended time periods, and (iii) landing on another planet. Whereas step two of the scenario, the survival in space, has been studied in depth in space experiments, there are only limited data on the survivability of microorganisms of the first step, i.e. the impact ejection. Hypervelocity impacts of large objects, such as asteroids or comets are considered as the most plausible process capable of ejecting microbe-bearing surface material from a planet into space. The shock damage of rocks induced by the ejection process is quite substantial and leads to localized melting in the ejected rocks. However, due to a spallation effect, moderately shocked, solid rock fragments from the uppermost layer of the target can be accelerated to very high velocities (e. g., > 5 km/s) as documented by the meteorites that originated from the moon or Mars. To simulate this impact scenario, in shock recovery experiments with an explosive set-up, resistant microbial test systems (bacterial endospores of Bacillus subtilis), sandwiched between two quartz layers, were subjected to a shock pressure of 32 GPa, which is in the upper range indicated by the Martian meteorites and which can be assumed to hold also for “Earth” meteorites. Although the spore layer showed an intense darkening after the shock treatment, up to 500 spores per sample survived, resulting in a survival rate up to 10−4. The data demonstrate that a substantial fraction of spores are able to survive the severe shock pressure and temperature conditions which must be expected for collisionally produced rock fragments from a medium-sized terrestrial planet that have escape velocities of approximately 5 km/s.


Shock Pressure Bacterial Spore Hypervelocity Impact Ejection Process Martian Meteorite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arrhenius S (1903) Die Verbreitung des Lebens im Weltenraum. Die Umschau 7: 481–485Google Scholar
  2. Artemieva NA, Stöffler D (2002) Conditions for the “launch window” of Martian meteorites: Observation and modeling [abs.]. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 37: A13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benardini JN, Sawyer J, Venkateswaran K, Nicholson WL (2003) Spore UV and acceleration resistance of endolithic Bacillus pumilus and B. subtilis isolates obtained from Sonoran desert basalt: implications for lithopanspermia. Astrobiology 3: 709–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bischoff A, Stöffler D (1992) Shock metamorphism as a fundamental process in the evolution of planetary bodies: Information from meteorites. European Journal of Mineralogy 4: 707–755Google Scholar
  5. Burchell MJ, Mann J, Bunch AW, Brandao PFB (2001) Survivability of bacteria in hypervelocity impact. Icarus 154: 545–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cano RJ, Borucki MK (1995) Revival and identification of bacterial spores in 25-to 40-million-year-old Dominican amber. Science 268: 1060–1064Google Scholar
  7. Clark BC (2001) Planetary interchange of bioactive material: probability factors and implications. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 31: 185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eugster O, Weigel A, Polnau E (1997) Ejection times of Martian meteorites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61: 2749–2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedmann EI (1980) Endolithic microbial life in hot and cold deserts. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 10: 223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritz J, Greshake A, Stöffler D (2003) Launch conditions for Martian meteorites: Plagioclase as a shock pressure barometer [abs.]. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIV, abs. # 1335 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  11. Horneck G (1995) Exobiology, the study of the origin, evolution and distribution of life within the context of cosmic evolution: a review. Planetary and Space Science 43: 189–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horneck G, Bücker H, Reitz G, Requardt H, Dose K, Martens KD, Mennigmann HD, Weber P (1984) Microorganisms in the space environment. Science 225: 226–228Google Scholar
  13. Horneck G, Bücker H, Reitz G (1994) Long-term survival of bacterial spores in space. Advances in Space Research 14: (10)41–(10)45Google Scholar
  14. Horneck G, Rettberg P, Reitz G, Wehner J, Eschweiler U, Strauch K, Panitz C, Starke V, Baumstark-Khan C (2001a) Protection of bacterial spores in space, a contribution to the discussion on Panspermia. Origin of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 31: 527–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horneck G, Stöffler D, Eschweiler U, Hornemann U (2001b) Bacterial spores survive simulated meteorite impact. Icarus 149: 285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mastrapa RMF, Glanzberg H, Head JN, Melosh HJ, Nicholson WL (2001) Survival of bacteria exposed to extreme acceleration: implications for Panspermia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 189: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melosh HJ (1985) Ejection of rock fragments from planetary bodies. Geology 13: 144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Melosh HJ (1988) The rocky road to Panspermia. Nature 332: 687–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melosh HJ (1989) Impact Cratering-A Geologic Process. Oxford University Press, New York, 245 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Mileikowsky C, Cucinotta FA, Wilson JW, Gladman B, Horneck G, Lindegren L, Melosh HJ, Rickman H, Valtonen M, Zheng JQ (2000) Natural transfer of viable microbes in space. Part 1: From Mars to Earth and Earth to Mars. Icarus 145: 391–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Müller WF, Hornemann U (1969) Shock induced planar deformation structures in experimentally shock loaded olivines and in olivines from chondritic meteorites. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 7: 251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicholson WL, Munakata N, Horneck G, Melosh HJ, Setlow P (2000) Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbial and Molecular Biology Reviews 64: 548–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nyquist LE, Bogard DD, Shih C-Y, Greshake A, Stöffler D, Eugster O (2001) Ages and histories of Martian meteorites. Space Science Reviews 96: 105–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stöffler D (2000) Maskelynite confirmed as diaplectic glass: Indication for peak shock pressures below 45 GPa in all Martian meteorites [abs.] Lunar Planetary Science XXXII, abstract # 1170 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  25. Stöffler D, Langenhorst F (1994) Shock metamorphism of quartz in nature and experiment: I. Basic observation and theory. Meteoritics 29: 155–181Google Scholar
  26. Stöffler D, Ostertag R, Jammes C, Pfannschmidt G, Sen Gupta PR, Simon SB, Papike JJ, Beauchamp RM (1986) Shock metamorphism and petrography of the Shergotty achondrite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50: 889–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vreeland RH, Rosenzweig WD, Powers DW (2000) Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal. Nature 407: 897–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerda Horneck
    • 1
  1. 1.German Aerospace Center DLRInstitute of Aerospace MedicineKoelnGermany

Personalised recommendations