Skip to main content

Distortion, metastability and breaking in charge-density wave transport: Recent experiments on niobium triselenide, suggesting a new mean-field approach

  • V. Hysteresis and Metastability
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Charge Density Waves in Solids

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 217))

Abstract

Some quantities relevant to mean-field models of charge-density wave (CDW) motion have been measured in NbSe3 between 144K and 60K. Data are presented on the threshold field ET, including the contribution from breaking (phase-slip) at the current terminals; on the increase of Frohlich current with field E, confirming the predicted variation as (E-ET)3/2 near threshold; and on the conduction due to transitions between metastable distorted states, and thus on the elastic modulus of the CDW. It is tentatively concluded that, at least between 60K and 90K, the conduction near threshold is restricted mainly by the need to maintain phase-slip at the boundaries of regions, perhaps pinned at surfaces, which do not join in the general motion. A new mean-field model, mathematically equivalent to those suggested by Fisher and by Sneddon, but related also to the phenomenological model of Tua and Zawadowski, is proposed to describe this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Frohlich, Proc. Roy. Soc. A L22, 296 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  2. see, e.g., the reviews by G. Gruner, Comments on Solid State Physics 10, 183 (1983), and N. P. Ong, Can. J. Phys. 60, 757 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1498 (1979), and 45, 1978 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. G. Chung, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6977 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Grüner, A. Zawadoski and P. M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 511 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Richard, P. Monceau and M. Renard, Phys. Rev. B 25, 948 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. Gill, Solid State Commun. 39, 1203 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. K. Fung and J. W. Steeds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1696 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Tamegai, K. Tsutsumi, S. Kagoshima, Y. Kanai, M. Tani, H. Tomozawa, M. Sato, K. Tsuji, J. Harada, M. Sakata and T. Nakajima, Solid State Commun. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. P. Ong, G. Verma and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 663 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. also J. C. Gill and A. W. Higgs, Solid State Commun. 48, 709 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Sneddon, M. C. Cross and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 292 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Matsukawa and H. Takayama, Solid State Commun. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1486 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Sneddon (preprint).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. F. Tua and A. Zawadowski, Solid State Commun. 49, 19 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. C. Gill, Solid State Commun. 44, 1041 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Zettl and G. Grüner, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2298 (1982); also R. P. Hall and A. Zettl, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Gill, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 81, 791 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. I. Batistić, A. Bjeliš and L. P. Gorkov (preprint) consider the case of current terminals covering the ends of the crystal, and predict that phase-slip will occur some distance inside it, giving a contribution to ET varying approximately as l −1.23. Whether the dependence in the present experiments, where contact was to one side of the crystal, is significantly different from this is uncertain, as there are indications that Vs is somewhat contact-dependent.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Monceau, M. Renard, J. Richard, M. C. Saint Lager, H. Salva and Z. Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 28, 1646 (1983), conclude that the frequency observed corresponds to passage through half-wavelengths. The values of Ic and νin figure 2 for E less than 1.5 ET give Ic/Sν ≈ 21 A cm−2MHz−1,, which appears to agree with that conclusion. However, it is evident that current then flows only through part of the cross-sectional area S, and that the true ratio of current density to ν is greater, possibly by a factor 2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Oda and M. Ido, Solid State Commun. 44, 1535 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. A. Lee and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 19, 3970 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. C. Gill, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Nonlinear Transport and Related Phenomena in Inorganic Quasi One-Dimensional Conductors, Hokkaido University, 1983: p. 139. The concentration of distortion near the current terminals noted in this paper resulted from the use of pulses shorter than the characteristic time T, the large value of which in long specimens was not then appreciated.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. C. Gill, J. Phys. F 10, L81 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gyula Hutiray Jenö Sólyom

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gill, J.C. (1985). Distortion, metastability and breaking in charge-density wave transport: Recent experiments on niobium triselenide, suggesting a new mean-field approach. In: Hutiray, G., Sólyom, J. (eds) Charge Density Waves in Solids. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 217. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-13913-3_237

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-13913-3_237

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13913-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39137-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics