Skip to main content

Equivalence relations, invariants, and normal forms, II

  • Section I: Complexity
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic and Machines: Decision Problems and Complexity (LaM 1983)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 171))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For an equivalence relation E on the words over some finite alphabet, we consider the following four problems, listed in order of increasing difficulty. Recognition: Decide whether two words are equivalent. Invariant: Calculate a function constant on precisely the equivalence classes. Normal form: Calculate a particular member of an equivalence class, given an arbitrary member. First member: Calculate the first member of an equivalence class, given an arbitrary member. We consider the questions whether p solutions for the easier problems yield NP solutions for the harder ones, or vice versa. We show that affirmative answers to several of these questions are equivalent to natural principles like NP=co-NP, NP ∩co-NP=P, and the shrinking principle for NP sets. We supplement known oracles with enough new ones to show that all the questions considered have negative answers relative to some oracles. In other words, these questions cannot be answered affirmatively by means of relativizable polynomial-time Turing reductions. Finally, we show that the analogous questions with "p" replaced by "Borel" have negative answers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Baker, J. Gill, and R. Solovay, Relativizations of the P=?NP question, SIAM J. Computing 4 (1975) 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Blass and Y. Gurevich, Equivalence relations, invariants, and normal forms, SIAM J. Computing, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Hewitt and K. Stromberg, Real and Abstract Analysis, Springer, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.G. Hinman, Recursion-Theoretic Hierarchies, Springer, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. John, Similarities between NP and analytic sets, preliminary report.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.C. Kleene, Recursive functionals and quantifiers of finite types, I, Trans. Amer. Math Soc., 91(1959) 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Moschovakis, Descriptive Set Theory, North-Holland, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Sipser, Borel sets and circuit complexity, extended abstract, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.J. Stockmeyer, The polynomial-time hierarchy, Theoret. Comp. Sci., 3(1977) 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

E. Börger G. Hasenjaeger D. Rödding

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blass, A., Gurevich, Y. (1984). Equivalence relations, invariants, and normal forms, II. In: Börger, E., Hasenjaeger, G., Rödding, D. (eds) Logic and Machines: Decision Problems and Complexity. LaM 1983. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-13331-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-13331-3_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-13331-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38856-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics