Skip to main content

Quanta in context

  • Mikroprozesse — Stochastische prozesse
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 701 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 100))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Joseph Agassi, “Between Micro and Macro”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 14 (1963) 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Towards an Historiography of Science, History and Theory, Beiheft 2; facsimile reprint, Weslyan University Press, Middletown, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “The Kirchhoff-Planck Radiation Law”, Science, 157, April 7, 1967, 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “The Correspondence Principle Revisited”, Science, 157, August 18, 1967, 794–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraday as a Natural Philosopher, Chicago University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “The Interface Between Philosophy and Physics”, Philosophy of Science, 39, 1972, 263–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • , Science in Flux, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “The Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory”, Phys. Rev., 115, 1959, 485–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Aharonov, H. Pendelton and A. Peterson, “A Deterministic Quantum Indeterminacy Experiment”, Int. J. Theoretical Physics, 3, 1970, 443–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. E. Ballantine, “The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 42, 1970, 358–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, Cambridge University Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr, “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev., 48, 1935, 696–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • , “Causality and Complementarity”, Dialectica, 2, 1948, 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niels Bohr, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Born, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Brillouin, Science and Information Theory, N.Y., 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science, Uncertainty and Information, N.Y., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mario Bunge, Foundations of Physics, Springer, N.Y., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Research, Springer, N.Y., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • (ed.), The Delaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics, Springer, N.Y., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • (ed.), Quantum Theory and Reality, Springer, N.Y., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Philosophy of Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “Quantum Mechanics and Measurement”, Int. J. Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 12, Sppl. 1, 1977, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bunge and A. Kálnay, “Welches sind die Besonderheiten der Quantenphysik gegenüber der klassischen Physik?”, in R. Haller und J. Götschl, Philosophie und Physik, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Chambers, “Shifts of Electron Interference Patterns by Enclosed Magnetic Flux”, Phys. Rev. Letters, 5, 1960, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. de Broglie, Non Linear Wave Mechanics, A Causal Interpretation, trans. A. J. Knodel and J. C. Miller, Elsevire, Amsterdam, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Introduction to the Vigier Theory of Elementary Particles, Elsevire, Amsterdam, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • , The Current Interpretations of Wave Mechanics, A Critical Study, Elsevire, Amsterdam, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. A. M. Dirac, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes” and “Replies to Criticisms”, in P. A. Schilpp, ed., Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, “Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev., 47, 1935, 777–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. P. Feynmann, The Feynmann Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3, Addison Wesley, Reading/Mass., 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael R. Gardner, “Two Deviant Logics for Quantum Theory: Bohr and Reichenbach”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 23, 1972, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory, transl., Carl Eckart and Frank C. Hoyt, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1930; Dover, New York, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “Der Begriff ‘Abgeschlossene Theorie’ in der moderne Naturwissenschaft”, Dialectica, 2, 1948, 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Physics and Philosophy, Harper, New York, 1958, Allen and Unwin, London, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “The Development of the Interpretation of Quantum Theory” in Wolfgang Pauli, Bohr Festschrift, New York, McGraw Hill, 1955, 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Jammer, The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics, McGraw Hill, N.Y., 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, John Wiley, N.Y., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imre Lakatos, “Infinite Regress and the Foundations of Mathematics”, Arist. Soc. Suppl. Vol., 36, 1962, 155–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred Landé, Foundations of Quantum Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • , From Dualism to Unity in Quantum Physics, Cambridge University Press, London, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • , New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Quantum Mechanics in a New Key, Exposition Press, Jericho, N.Y., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Ludwig, Wave Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “A Theoretical Description of Single Microscopic Systems”, in: W. C. Price and S. S. Chiswick, eds., The Uncertainty Principle and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, John Wiley, N.Y., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang Pauli, Editorial, Dialectica, 2, 1948, 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang Pauli, Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics, Essays dictated to Niels Bohr on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, McGraw Hill, New York, 1955, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Aufsdtze und Vorträge über Physik und Erkenntnistheorie, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl R. Popper, “Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and in Classical Physics”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 1, 1950, 117–33, 173–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • , The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Huthcinsin, London, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “Quantum Mechanics without the ‘Observer'”, in M. Bunge, ed., Quantum Theory and Relativity, Springer, N.Y., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. C. Price and S. S. Chiswick, eds., The Uncertainty Principle and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, John Wiley, N.Y., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. L. G. Readhead, “Wave-Particle Duality”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 28, 1977, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon Rosenfeld, “On Quantization of Fields”, Nuclear Physics, 40, 1963, 353–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “The Macroscopic Level of Quantum Mechanics”, in C. George, I. Prigogin and L. Rosenfeld, Mathematisk-physiske meddelelsar, Copenhagen, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “Statistical Causality in Atomic Theory”, in Y. Elkana, ed., The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, Humanities, N.Y., 1975, 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel Sachs, “A New Theory of Elementary Matter”, Int. J. Theoretical Physics, 4, 1971, 433–51, 453–76; 5, 1972, 35–53, 161–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin Schrödinger, Statistical Thermodynamics, Cambridge University Press, London 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • , “Are There Quantum Jumps?”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 3, 1953, 109–123, 233–242. (Reprinted in his What is Life and Other Essays, Anchor, Doubleday, New York.)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Schrödinger, M. Planck and A. H. Lorentz, Briefe zur Wellenmechanik, Springer, Wien, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian Schwinger, Particles and Sources, Notes by Tung-mow Yan, Gordon and Breach, N.Y., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • , Particles, Sources, and Fields, Addison Wesley, Reading/Mass., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abner Shimony, “Metaphysical Problems in the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”, Int. Phil. Quarterly, 18, 1978, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. L. van der Waerden, Sources of Quantum Mechanics, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor Weisskopf, “Niels Bohr”, New York Review of Books, April, 20, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. F. von Weizsäcker, “Probability and Quantum Mechanics”, Brit. J. Phil. Sci., 24, 1973, 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. Nelkowski A. Hermann H. Poser R. Schrader R. Seiler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Agassi, J. (1979). Quanta in context. In: Nelkowski, H., Hermann, A., Poser, H., Schrader, R., Seiler, R. (eds) Einstein Symposion Berlin. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-09718-X_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-09718-X_74

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09718-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38512-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics