Managing interactive systems for user effectiveness

  • Richard P. Kelisky
Session 2: Managing Interactive Systems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 49)


The management of interactive systems at IBM's Thomas J. Watson Research Center is based on the assumptions that the user's time and work product are valuable, and that the system he uses should be managed so that his ability to work is enhanced with least inconvenience to him. Within the financial limits on hardware and people it is possible to provide high quality interactive computing services which approach these objectives by placing highest priority on system reliability and availability followed by performance improvements and introduction of new functions. We find, first, that it is essential to maintain a management commitment to the goal of good service to the laboratory, and second, that published service schedules must be adhered to. At the same time, it is necessary to realize that users will have special problems, and management must be willing to work out solutions for these users. The computer operator has as his goal to keep the system up, and system programmers must avoid system changes which jeopardize stability.


Interactive System Data Migration Watson Research Performance Measurement Approach Migration Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    W. J. Doherty, Measurement and Management of Interactive Computing, Proceedings of SHARE XLIV, vol. 3, 1587–1598, March 1975.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    W. J. Doherty, C. H. Thompson and S. J. Boies, An Analysis of Interactive System Usage with Respect to Software, Linguistic, and Scheduling Attributes, IBM Research Report RC 3914, June 30, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    S. J. Boies, Interactive Computer Usage Behavior, IBM Systems Journal 13, No. 1, 2–18, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    G. Waldbaum, Large Capacity Storage and Time Sharing System/360, IBM Research Report RC 2698, November 11, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    W. J. Doherty, The Effects of Adaptive Reflective Scheduling, IBM Research Report, RC 3672, September 1, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    D. N. Streeter, Cost-Benefit Evaluation of Scientific Computing Services, IBM Systems Journal 11, No. 3, 219–233, 1972.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    P. H. Callaway, A Performance Measurement Approach for VM/370, IBM Research Report RC 4666, January 4, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard P. Kelisky
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Thomas J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations