Skip to main content

Symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction: Using These Patient-Reported Outcomes in People with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

  • Chapter
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kaplan RM (2002) Quality of life: An outcomes perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(Suppl 2): S44–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick DL (2003) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): an organizing tool for concepts, measures and applications. Qual Life Newsletter 31: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kamolz T, Pointer R (2002) Expectations of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease for the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Laparosc Endo Percutan Tech 12: 389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (2001) Psychiatric disorders affect outcomes of antireflux operations for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 15: 171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Velanovich V (2003) The effect of chronic pain syndromes and psychoemotional disorders in symptomatic and quality of life outcomes of antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 7: 53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eubanks TR, Omelanczuk P, Richards C et al (2000) Outcome of laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Am J Surg 179: 391–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Codman EA (1914) The product of a hospital. Surg Gyn Obst 18: 491–496

    Google Scholar 

  8. McColl E (2004) Best practice in symptom assessment: a review. Gut 53(Suppl IV): IV49–IV54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C (1987) Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain 28: 297–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR (1998) Antireflux surgery: a current comparison of open and laparoscopic approaches. Hepatogastroenterology 45: 1328–3337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pope CE II (1992) The quality of life following antireflux surgery. World J Surg 16: 355–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Velanovich V, Karmy-Jones R (1998) Measuring gastroesophageal reflux disease: relationship between health-related quality-of-life scores and physiologic parameters. Am Surg 64: 649–653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi G, Tatum RP, Joehl RJ et al (1999) Esophageal sensitivity and symptom perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 1: 214–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katzka DA (1999) Digestive system disorders: gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Evidence 1: 145–153

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kulig M, Leodolter A, Vieth M et al (2003) Quality of life in relation to symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease — an analysis based on the ProGERD initiative. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18: 767–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Watson DI, Foreman D, Devitt PG (1997) Preoperative endoscopic grading of esophagitis versus outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Am J Gastroenterol 92: 222–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bammer T, Freeman M, Shabriari A et al (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with nonerosive reflux disease. J Gastointest Surg 6: 730–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamolz T, Bammer T, Granderath FA et al (2001) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients with concomitant anxiety disorders. Dig Liver Dis 33: 659–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamolz T, Granderath FA, Pointner R (2003) Does major depression affect the outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery? Surg Endosc 17: 55–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Falk GW (2001) Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 33: 109–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dent J, Armstrong D, Delaney B et al (2004) Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations and discussion outputs. Gut 53(Suppl IV): IV1–IV24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bytzer P (2004) Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes. Gut 53(Suppl IV): IV28–IV34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Girling DJ et al (1997) Randomized trials with quality of life end-points: are doctors’ ratings of patients’ physical symptoms interchangeable with patients self-ratings? Qual Life Res 6: 225–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandmark S, Carlsson R, Fausa O et al (1988) Omeprazole or ranitidine in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Results of a double-blind, randomized Scandinavian multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol 23: 625–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyrwich KW, Staebler Tardino VM (2004) A blueprint for symptom scales and responses: measurement and reporting. Gut 53(Suppl IV): IV45–IV48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw M (2004) Diagnostic utility of reflux disease symptoms. Gut 53(Suppl IV): IV25–IV27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Revicki DA, Wood M, Maton PN et al (1998) The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life. Am J Med 104: 252–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eloubeidi MA, Provenzale D (2000) Health-related quality of life and severity of symptoms in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease patients without Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 1881–1887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Berzon RA, Hays RD, Shumaker SA (1993) International use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 2: 367–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118: 622–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization (1948) WHO Constitution. Geneva WHO

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guyatt G, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S, Feeny D et al (1989) Measuring quality of life in clinical trials: a taxonomy and review. Can Med Assoc J 140: 1441–1448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudak PL, Wright JG (2000) The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 25: 3167–3177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Linder-Pelz S (1982) Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 16: 577–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ware JE, Davies-Avery A, Stewart AL (1978) The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction. Health Med Care Serv Rev 1: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kravitz RL (1996) Patients’ expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Review 53: 3–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM et al (2003) Measuring satisfaction with migraine treatment: expectations, importance, outcomes and global ratings. Clin Ther 25: 2920–2935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Locker D, Dunt D (1978) Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. Soc Sci Med 12: 283–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson PD et al (1997) Issues in the measurement of treatment satisfaction. Am J Manag Care 3: 579–594

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bessell JR, Finch R, Gotley DC et al (2000) Chronic dysphagia following laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 87: 1341–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Vakil N, Shaw M, Kirby R (2003) Clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic fundoplication in a U.S. community. Am J Med 114: 1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cleary P, McNeil B (1998) Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry 22: 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  43. Patrick DL, Erickson P (1993) Health status and health policy: quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dougall A, Russel A, Rutin G et al (2000) Rethinking patient satisfaction: patient experiences of an open access flexible sigmoidoscopy service. Soc Sci Med 50: 53–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Feinstein AR (1987) Global indexes and scales. In: Clinimetrics. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  46. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger M et al (2002) Long term follow-up after laparoscopic refundoplication for failed antireflux surgery: quality of life, symptomatic outcome, and patient satisfaction. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 812–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Coyne KS, Wiklund I, Schmier J et al (2003) Development and validation of a disease-specific treatment satisfaction questionnaire for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Ailment Pharmacol Ther 18: 907–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Revicki DA (2004) Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues. GUT 53(Suppl IV): IV40–IV44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sitzia J (1999) How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 11: 319–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kirshner B, Guyatt G (1985) A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 38: 27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Reliability. In: Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice (2nd ed), Prentice Hall Health, New Jersey, pp 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  52. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, de Witte LP et al (1997) Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: the Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68. J Clin Epidemiol 50: 529–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT et al (2000) Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 53: 459–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM et al (2003) On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 12: 349–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kazis L, Anderson J, Meenan R (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27(Suppl): 178–189

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG (1990) Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation. Med Care 28: 632–642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis 40: 171–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ware JE, Keller SD (1996) Interpreting general health measures. In: Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (Spilker B, ed). Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven, pp 445–460

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lydick EG, Epstein RS (1993) Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res 2: 221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Guyatt G, Osoba D, Wu A et al (2002) Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 77: 371–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GD (1989) Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10: 407–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust (2002) Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criterion. Qual Life Res 11: 193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Acquadro C, Jambon B, Ellis D et al (1996) Language and translation issues. In: Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (Spilker B, ed). Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven, pp 575–585

    Google Scholar 

  65. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46: 1417–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Bullinger M, Power MJ, Aaronson NK et al (1996) Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In: Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (Spilker B, ed). Philadelphia: Lippencott-Raven, pp 659–668

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yacavone RF, Locke R, Provenzale DT et al (2001) Quality of life measurement in gastroenterology: what is available? Am J Gastroenterol 96: 285–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Eisen GM, Locke GK, Provenzale D (1999) Health-related quality of life: a primer for gastroenterologists. Am J Gastro Enterol 94: 2017–2021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Kamolz T, Pointer R, Velanovich V (2003) The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on quality of life. Surg Endosc 17: 1193–1199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Irvine EJ (2004) Quality of life assessment in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. GUT 53(Suppl IV): IV35–IV39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Borgaonkar MR, Irvine EJ (2000) Quality of life measurement in gastrointestinal and liver disorders. GUT 47: 444–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Svedlund J, Sjödin I, Dotevall G (1988) GSRS — A clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci 33: 129–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR et al (1996) Quality of life scale for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 183: 217–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S et al (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery. Evidence-based guidelines of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 879–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Allen CJ, Parameswaran K, Belda J et al (2003) Reproducibility, validity and responsiveness of a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 13: 265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Anvari M, Allen C (2003) Five-year comprehensive outcomes evaluation in 181 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Am Coll Surg 196: 51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Eypasch E, Williams J, Wood Dauphinee S et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82: 216–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Wiklund IK, Junghard O, Grace E et al (1998) Quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD). Eur J Surg 164(Suppl 583): 41–49

    Google Scholar 

  79. Fuchs KH, Feussner H, Bonavina L et al (1997) Current status and trends in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: results of a consensus meeting. Endoscopy 29: 298–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F et al (1999) First validation of the French version of Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23: 25–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Eypasch E, Wood Dauphinee S, Williams JI et al (1993) Der Gastrointestinale Lebensqualiitäts-Index (GLQI). Der Chirurg 64: 264–274

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Quintana JM, Cabriada J, De Lòpez Tejada I et al (2001) Translation and validation of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 93: 693–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Revicki DA, Crawley JA, Zodet MW et al (1999) Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13: 1621–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Kaplan-Machlis B, Spiegler GE, Revicki DA (1999) Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with gastrointestinal reflux disease. Ann Pharmacother 33: 1032–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Ofman JJ (2003) The economic and quality-of-life impact of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 98: S9–S14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Dupuy HJ (1984) The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In: Wegner NK, Mattson ME, Furberg CF, Elinson J (eds) Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. Le Jadq Publishing Inc., pp 170–183

    Google Scholar 

  87. Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 37: 385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Rothman M, Farup C, Stewart W et al (2001) Symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Dig Dis Sci 46: 1540–1548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Dimenäs E, Carlsson G, Glise H et al (1996) Relevence of norm values as part of the documentation of quality of life instrument for use in upper gastrointestinal disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 31(Suppl 221): 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  90. Glise IT, Halterbach B, Johansson B (1995) Quality of life assessment in the evaluation of gastrointestinal reflux and peptic ulcer disease before, during and after treatment. Scand J Gastroenterol 30(Suppl 208): 133–135

    Google Scholar 

  91. Revicki DA, Leidy NK, Howland L (1996) Evaluating the psychometric characteristics of the Psychological General Well-Being Index with a new response scale. Qual Life Res 5: 417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A user’s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  94. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF et al (1994) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32: 40–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Gandek B, Ware JE (1998) Translating functional health and well-being: International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project studies of the SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 51: 903–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Osoba D (1998) Guidelines for measuring health-related quality of life in clinical trials. In: Quality of life assessment in clinical trials (Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  97. Osoba D (1996) Rationale for the timing of health-related quality-of-life (HQL) assessments in oncological palliative therapy. Can Treat Rev 22(Suppl A): 69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI et al (1994) Eliciting health related information post-discharge: telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 1286–1296

    Google Scholar 

  99. Cook D, Guyatt G, Juniper E et al (1993) Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma. J Clin Epidemiol 46: 529–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Weinburger M, Oddone EZ, Sainsa G et al (1996) Are health related quality of life measures affected by the mode of administration? J Clin Epidemiol 49: 135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Chambers LW, Haight M, Norman G et al (1987) Sensibility to change and the effect of mode of administration. Med Care 21: 551–567

    Google Scholar 

  102. Fairclough DL (1998) Methods of analysis for longitudinal studies of health-related quality of life. In: Quality of life assessment in clinical trials (Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 227–247

    Google Scholar 

  103. Fairclough DL (2004) Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research. Stat Meth Med Res 13: 115–138

    Google Scholar 

  104. Lohr KN (1992) Application of health status assessment measures in clinical practice. Med Care 30: MS1–MS14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Deyo RA, Patrick DL (1989) Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation of patient care and policy research. Med Care 27: S254–S267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Kazis LE, Callahan LF, Meenan RF et al (1990) Health status reports in the care of patients with arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 43: 1243–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH et al (2002) Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication. JAMA 288: 3027–3034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Wagner AK, Ehrenberg BL, Tran TA et al (1997) Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients’ care. Qual Life Res 6: 329–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso G et al (2000) Provision of feedback on perceived health status to healthcare professionals. Med Care 38: 175–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Detmar SB, Aaronson NK (1998) Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study. Eur J Cancer 34: 1181–1186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. McLachlan S-A, Allenby J, Wirth A et al (2001) Randomized trial of coordinated psychosocial intervention based on patient assessments versus standard care to improve social functioning of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 4117–4125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Veilikova G, Brown JM, Booth L et al (2002) A randomized study of using regular quality of life measurement in the care of individual cancer patients. Qual Life Res 11: 631

    Google Scholar 

  113. Feldman LS, Mayrand S, Stanbridge D et al (2001) Laparoscopic fundoplication: a model for assessing new technology in surgical procedures. Surgery 130: 686–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Eypasch E, Neugebauer E, Fisher F et al (1997) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Results of a Consensus Development Conference. Surg Endosc 11: 413–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Dimenäs E, Glise H, Hallerback B et al (1995) Well-being and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients referred to endoscopy owing to suspected duodenal ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol 30: 1046–1052

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I et al (1998) Reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res 7: 75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Talley NJ, Fullerton S, Junghard O et al (2001) Quality of life in patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn: reliability and sensitivity of disease-specific instruments. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 1998–2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Dimenäs E, Glise H, Hallerback B et al (1993) Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens? Scand J Gastroenterol 28: 681–687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Mobius C, Stein HJ, Feith M et al (2001) Quality of life before and after laparscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 15: 353–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM et al (2002) Quality of life, surgical outcome and patient satisfaction three years after laparoscopic Nissen funoplication. World J Surg 26: 1234–1238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wood-Dauphinee, S., Korolija, D. (2006). Symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction: Using These Patient-Reported Outcomes in People with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Granderath, F.A., Kamolz, T., Pointner, R. (eds) Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32317-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-32317-1_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-23589-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-32317-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics