Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Slovenia

The Protection of Personality Rights against Invasions by Mass Media in Slovenia

  • Chapter
Persönlichkeitsschutz gegenüber Massenmedien

Part of the book series: Tort and Insurance Law ((TIL,volume 13))

  • 561 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Lampe, Pravica do zasebnosti, zagovor njene široke implementacije (2003), 196.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Finžgar, Pravica do osebnega življenja, [1958] Zbornik znanstvenih razprav Pravne fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (ZZR) XXVII, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Finžgar, Francuska deklaracija o pravima čovjeka i građanina i prava ličnosti, in: E. Pušić (ed.), Francuska revolucija-ljudska prava (1991), 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Finžgar, Pravica do osebnega življenja (1966); A. Finžgar, Osebnostne pravice (1985); A. Finžgar, Civilnopravno varstvo človekovih pravic, in: P. Jambrek (ed.), Varstvo človekovih pravic (1988), 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Stromholm/ A. Finžgar, et al. Die Haftung der Massenmedien, insbesondere der Presse, bei Eingriffen in persönliche oder gewerbliche Rechtspositionen (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Sajovic, Osebnostne pravice in civilno pravo, Pravnik (1988), 567–581; B. Sajovic, Nekateri teoretični pristopi k fenomenu osebnostnih pravic (1990); B. Sajovic, O pravni naravi osebnostnih pravic (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Lapajne, Razvoj in stanje našega državljanskega prava (1st edn. 1934). On Serbian territory, the Serbian Civil Code, as well as in Montenegro the Montenegrinian Civil Code, independently regulated the Civil Law. The Austrian Civil Code, although non-novelized, was valid in inner Croatia (not in Dalamatia, there the novelized Austrian Code was in force) as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. A special Civil Law regime, based on the precedents by the Supreme Court in Budapest (Kuria), was established in Voivodina.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lapajne, Mnenja k predhodnem načrtu državljanskega zakonika za Kraljevino Jugoslavijo (1938); S. Lapajne, Načrt odškodninsko-pravnih določb za jugoslovanski državljanski zakonik, [1938] ZZR, no. 37–38, 256–268.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Judgment of the Supreme Court of Public’s Republic of Slovenia Sodba Vrhovnega sodišča LR Slovenije, 24 October 1946, Pv 350/46, published in Ljudski pravnik (Ljubljana 1946), 425–426.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Judgment of the Federal Supreme Court, revision nr. 247/64, published in Collection of Supreme Court Judgments, Zbirka sudskih odluka IX/1, 1964, no. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Judgment of the Supreme Court (Sodba Vrhovnega sodišča) II Ips 402/99; published in Supreme Court, Collection of Judgments, Vrhovno sodišče, Zbirka odločb 2000, (2000), 179.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Deisinger, Penal Code — Commentary, (Kazenski zakon SRS) (1985), 433.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Judgment of the Supreme Court, II Ips 507/2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V.V. Vodinelić, Lična prava, in: M. Orlić (ed.), Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (1978), 913–936.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Judgment of the Supreme Court, II Ips 402/99, 19.4.2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Finžgar, Varstvo osebnostnih pravic po ZOR, [1980] Pravnik 297.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Judgment of the Constitutional Court U-I-51/90; Judgment of the Constitutional Court, U-I-137/93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, VS RS II Ips 272/2000, published in Zbirka odločb (2000), 194–195.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Cigoj, Commentary of the art. 155, in: K. Blagojević (ed.), Komentar zakona o obveznim odnosima (1980), 430–431.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Judgment of the Supreme Court, II Ips 194/92; Judgment of the Supreme Court II Ips 582/96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Strohsack, Odškodninsko pravo in druge neposlovne obvezosti, Obligacijska razmerja II (2nd edn. 1994), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Strohsack Odškodninsko pravo in druge neposlovne obvezosti, Obligacijska razmerja II (2nd edn. 1994) (supra fn. 21), 96.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Decision of the Supreme Court, VS RS II Ips 184/2000, II Ips 185/2000, published in [2000] Zbirka odločb, 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Toroman, Commentary of the art. 199, in: K. Blagojević (ed.), Komentar zakona o obveznim odnosima (1980), 535.

    Google Scholar 

  25. “The plaintiff can demand, besides compensation in money for pecuniary loss, also compensation in money for non-pecuniary loss in cases of defamation”. Judgment of the Supreme Court of S. Republic of Croatia, Rev. 2071/83, published in Pregled VS Hrvatske, no. 25, 1984, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Radolović, Građanskopravna zaštita subjektivnih neimovinskih prava (1984), 192.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Strohsack Odškodninsko pravo in druge neposlovne obvezosti, Obligacijska razmerja II (2nd edn. 1994) (supra fn. 21), 223.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Finžgar, Osebnostne pravice (1985), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  29. V.V. Vodinelić, Lična prava, in: M. Orlić (ed.), Enciklopedija imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada (1978), 913–936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rok Lampe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Helmut Koziol Alexander Warzilek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lampe, R. (2005). Slovenia. In: Koziol, H., Warzilek, A. (eds) Persönlichkeitsschutz gegenüber Massenmedien. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 13. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-29443-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation