Skip to main content

Damages

  • Chapter
  • 827 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See the references in U. Magnus, Comparative Report on the Law of Damages, in: U. Magnus (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages (2001, hereafter cited as PETL Damages) no. 1 fn. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also Art. 24 of the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (“Rome II”), COM(2003) 427 final, 22.7.2003: “non-compensatory damages, such as exemplary or punitive damages, … contrary to Community public policy”.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also Art. 10:103 and the comments on Causation (Chapter 3).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. the following country reports in PETL Damages: W.V.H. Rogers, England, no. 9; S. Galand-Carval, France, no. 12 et seq.; K. Kerameus, Greece, no. 2; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, no.7; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, no. 19; see also J. Neethling, South Africa, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 9; H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no.13 et seq.; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 1; H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 1; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 1; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 1; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 1; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 1; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 7; see also J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 1 et seq.; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See H. Cousy/ A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 11 et seq.; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 1; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 7; K. Kera-meus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 1; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 5; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 15; see also J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 5; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 1 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  8. An exception can be found in Austria and Switzerland where the extent of compensation depends on the degree of fault: cf. H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For further details see U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 21 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Compare for details U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 8 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 1 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Busnelli/ G. Comande, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.H. Wissink/ W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 3 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 11; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See thereto U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. This seems also to be the general rule in many countries: see for instance W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 53; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 49; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 61; J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 19, 28; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 19, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See thereto in particular H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See, e.g., § 843 German BGB.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See the references in fn. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 89 with references.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Compare H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 63; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 49; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 20; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M.H. Wissink/ W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 99 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  28. W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 53. At the time of our Comparative Report on Damages periodical payments were only possible in England by agreement between the parties. However, when the Courts Act 2003 comes into force there will be a general discretion to make a periodical payment award in personal injury cases.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See in particular F. Busnelli/ G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 59; J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 61; H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 56, 58; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no 49; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 47; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 18; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 59; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 61; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 47; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 18; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 59; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 93; also J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See for instance H. Cousy/ A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 56, 58; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no 49; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 84 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  35. In favour of deduction see H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 105 et seq.; H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 142; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 83; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 22 (in Italy the courts order sometimes deductions in these cases); M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 129 (though disputed). Against deduction see W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 80; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 86; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 37; J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 50; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  36. In favour of deduction though with differing qualifications see for H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 109 et seq.; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 87 et seq.; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 134; J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 54. Against deduction see H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, 146, 56 et seq.; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 84; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 90; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 40; probably also K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 40; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 115 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 9; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 12 et seq.; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 2; F. Busnelli/G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 7; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 19; also J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 9; H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 13 et seq.; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See also Commentary to Art. 10:101.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See U. Magnus, Comparative Report, in U. Magnus (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Damages (2001, hereafter cited as PETL Damages) no. 64 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  41. H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See in detail W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 31 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 33,36.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Cousy/ A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  45. U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cf. infra Art. 10:301 no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  47. For instance Austrian law accepts such compensation: see H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 81 et seq. The same is true for the USA: G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 25. On the contrary England (W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 63), France (S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 68), Germany (U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 62), Greece (K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 27), the Netherlands (M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 110) and South Africa (J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 35) deny compensation in such cases.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See already the references cited supra Art. 10:104 no. 8 and Art. 10:201 no. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See in particular W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 31 et seq.; S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 33, 36.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 90 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Compare the references in fn. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See, e.g., H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 40,95; W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 33 et seq.; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See the survey by U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 64 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See W.V.H. Rogers, England, PETL Damages, no. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  55. S. Galand-Carval, France, PETL Damages, no. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  56. U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 35 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  57. K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  58. H. Cousy/ A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 124 et seq. Also South Africa (J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 21) and the USA (G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 12) follow the approach to compensate the pure loss of use.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  60. F. Busnelli/ G. Comandé, Italy, PETL Damages, no. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Compare the references cited in Art. 10:202 no. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Austrian law disallows such kind of fictitious damage (see H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 50) while the other countries allow it (see the references in U. Magnus, Comparative Report, PETL Damages, no. 71 fn. 129 et seq.).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Partly diminution in (market) value is regarded as the upper limit of compensation if costs of repair exceed this amount: see H. Koziol, Austria, PETL Damages, no. 103; K. Kerameus, Greece, PETL Damages, no. 36; M.H. Wissink/W. van Boom, The Netherlands, PETL Damages, no. 126, also J. Neethling, South Africa, PETL Damages, no. 48; G. Schwartz, USA, PETL Damages, no. 34. Other legal systems do not draw this line strictly: see H. Cousy/A. Vanderspikken, Belgium, PETL Damages, no. 140; U. Magnus, Germany, PETL Damages, no. 81 (allowance up to 130 %).

    Google Scholar 

  64. See Art. 10:202 no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See J. Fedtke, Germany, in H. Koziol/ B. Steininger (eds.), European Tort Law 2001 (2002) 232 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Law Commission, Claims for Wrongful Death (1999) § 9.2.

    Google Scholar 

  67. See W.V.H. Rogers, Comparative Report, in W.V.H Rogers (ed), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective (2001, hereafter cited as Rogers, Non-Pecuniary Loss) 262 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  68. See infra no. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  69. See generally Rogers, Non-Pecuniary Loss (supra fn. 5).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Rogers, Non-Pecuniary Loss (supra fn. 5), at 257 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Art. 2:101 no. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  72. E. Karner/ H. Koziol, Austria; H. Cousy/D. Droshout, Belgium; W.V.H. Rogers, England; S. Galand-Carval, France; U. Magnus/J. Fedtke, Germany; K.D. Kerameus, Greece; F.D. Bus-nelli/G. Comandé, Italy; M.H. Wissink/W.H. van Boom, The Netherlands; M. Nesterowicz/E. Baginska, Poland; M. Martin-Casals/J. Ribot/J. Solé, Spain. There is also information on Israeli (I. Gilead) and Swiss (P. Tercier) law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busnelli, F.D. et al. (2005). Damages. In: Principles of European Tort Law. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27751-X_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics