Summary
Perceptional benefits and potential risks of electrical stimulation of the central auditory system are constantly changing due to ongoing developments and technical modifications. Therefore, we would like to introduce current treatment protocols and strategies that might have an impact on functional results of auditory brainstem implants (ABI) in profoundly deaf patients.
Patients with bilateral tumours as a result of neurofibromatosis type 2 with complete dysfunction of the eighth cranial nerves are the most frequent candidates for auditory brainstem implants. Worldwide, about 300 patients have already received an ABI through a translabyrinthine or suboccipital approach supported by multimodality electrophysiological monitoring. Patient selection is based on disease course, clinical signs, audiological, radiological and psycho-social criteria.
The ABI provides the patients with access to auditory information such as environmental sound awareness together with distinct hearing cues in speech. In addition, this device markedly improves speech reception in combination with lip-reading. Nonetheless, there is only limited open-set speech understanding.
Results of hearing function are correlated with electrode design, number of activated electrodes, speech processing strategies, duration of pre-existing deafness and extent of brainstem deformation.
Functional neurostimulation of the central auditory system by a brainstem implant is a safe and beneficial procedure, which may considerably improve the quality of life in patients suffering from deafness due to bilateral retrocochlear lesions.
The auditory outcome may be improved by a new generation of microelectrodes capable of penetrating the surface of the brainstem to access more directly the auditory neurons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coletti V, Sacchetto L, Giarbini N et al (2000) Retrosigmoid approach for auditory brainstem implant. J Laryngol & Otol 114(27): 37–40
Ebinger K, Otto S, Arcaroli J et al (2000) Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: US clinical trial results. J Laryngol & Otol 114(27): 50–53
Edgerton BJ, House WF, Hitselberger W (1982) Hearing by cochlear nucleus stimulation in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl] 91: 117–124
El-Kashlan HK, Niparko JK, Altschuler RA et al (1991) Direct electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus: surface vs. penetrating stimulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 105: 533–543
Frohne C, Matthies C, Lesinski-Schiedat A et al (2000) Extensive monitoring during auditory brainstem implant surgery. J Laryngol & Otol 114(27): 11–14
Hitselberger WE, House WF, Edgerton BJ et al (1984) Cochlear nucleus implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92: 52–54
Kuchta J, Otto SR, Shannon RV et al (2004) The multichannel auditory brainstem implant: how many electrodes make sense? J Neurosurg 100: 16–23
Laszig R, Kuzma J, Seifert V et al (1991) The Hannover auditory brainstem implant: a multiple-electrode prosthesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 248: 420–421
Lenarz M, Matthies C, Lesinski-Schiedat A et al (2002) Auditory brainstem implant: Part II: Subjective assessment of functional outcome. Otol & Neurotol 23: 694–697
Lenarz T, Moshrefi M, Matthies C et al (2001) Auditory brainstem implant: Part I. Auditory performance and its evolution over time. Otol & Neurotol 22: 823–833
Liu X, McPhee G, Seldon HL et al (1997) Histological and physiological effects of the central audit. prosthesis: surface versus penetrating electrodes. Hear Res 114: 264–274
Matthies C, Thomas S, Moshrefi M et al (2000) Auditory brainstem implants: current neurosurgical experiences and perspective. J Laryngol & Otol 114: 32–36
McCreery DB, Yuen TG, Agnew WF et al (1992) Stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cochlear nucleus of the cat: histologic and physiologic effects. Hear Res 62: 42–56
Nevison B, Laszig R, Sollmann WP et al (2002) Results from a European clinical investigation of the Nucleus© multichannel auditory brainstem implant. Ear & Hearing 23(3): 170–183
Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE et al (2002) Multichannel auditory brainstem implant: update on performance in 61 patients. J Neurosurg 96: 1063–1071
Sollmann WP, Laszig R, Marangos N (2000) Surgical experiences in 58 cases using the Nucleus 22 multichannel auditory brainstem implant. J Laryngol & Otol 114: 23–26
Waring MD (1995) Auditory brain-stem responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlear nucleus in human subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 96: 338–347
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tatagiba, M., Gharabaghi, A. (2005). Electrically evoked hearing perception by functional neurostimulation of the central auditory system. In: von Wild, K.R.H. (eds) Re-Engineering of the Damaged Brain and Spinal Cord. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 93. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27577-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27577-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-24150-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-27577-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)