Skip to main content

Using Concept Maps to Examine Business Models and Drivers of Competitive Advantage for Travel eMediaries

  • Conference paper
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005
  • 1091 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes a study that has explored the body of literature on competitive advantage and placed this in the context of the development of travel eMediaries (online intermediaries). The work uses concept maps to highlight determinants of performance in online intermediation in this sector and the relationships among these variables. The paper identifies the most significant contributors to competitive advantage and examines their application through selected eMediaries. In conclusion, key areas for further research are suggested including proposed work from the authors on analysis of determinants of competitive advantage for eMediaries and their networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amit, R. and C. Zott (2001). “Value Creation in e-Business.” Strategic Management Journal #22, pp 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, Vol 17, pg 99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniele, R. and Frew, A. J. (2004) From Intermediaries to Market-makers: An Analysis of the Evolution of eMediaries, ENTER2004 Conference Proceedings, Cairo, Egypt pg546–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage, The Academy of Management Review, Vol 23, #4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • e-tid.com (2004) IHG sets out new rules for online distribution partners, URL:http://www.e-tid.eom/pma/21600, accessed on 08/0/2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Expedia (2003) Annual Report, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentelsaz, L., Maicas-Lopez, J. P. and Polo, Y (2002). Assessments of the “new economy scenario”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol 5, #4, pg 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., Nohria, N. and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 21, pg 203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAC/InterActiveCorp (2004) Q4 2003 Earnings, URL:http://www.iac.com/investor_relations/financials/IAC_O403_Earnings.pdf, accessed on 11/08/04

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. (2003). A Review of the Electronic Commerce Literature to Determine the Meaning of the Term “Business Model”. School of Commerce Research Paper Series, School of Commerce-Flinders University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastminute.com (2004) Annual Report, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, J. A., Hamilton, B.H. and Wada, T. (2001) Market Position, Resource Profile and Governance: Linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan, Strategic Management Journal, #22

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. and Y. Pigneur (2002). An e-Business Model Ontolofy for Modelling e-Business. 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference: e-Reality: Constructing the e-Economy, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateli, A. (2002). A Domain Area Report on Business Models. Athens, Athens University of Economics and Business — ELTRUN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource based view, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 14, #3

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining superior performance, The Free Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, M. (2001) Managing the digital enterprise-Business Models on the Web. http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html accessed on 05/02/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Travel Research (2003) Merchant Model Impact on 2003 U.S. Hotel Profits Estimated to be $1 Billion. S. T. R. Reports, Hospitality Net. http://www.hospitalitynet.org/news accessed on 08/03/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and DShuen, A. (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 18, #7, pg 509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P. and M. Vitale (2001) From Place to Space: Migrating to e-Business Models. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984) A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 5, #2, pg171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Werthner, H. and Klein, S (1999) Information Technology and Tourism — A Challenging Relationship, Springer, Wien, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggings, R. and Ruefli, T. (2002) Sustained Competitive Advantage: Temporal Dynamics and the Incidence and Persistence of Superior Economic Performance, Organization Science Vol 13, #1 pg 82–105

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daniele, R., Frew, A.J. (2005). Using Concept Maps to Examine Business Models and Drivers of Competitive Advantage for Travel eMediaries. In: Frew, A.J. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2005. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27283-6_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-27283-6_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-24148-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-27283-1

Publish with us

Policies and ethics