Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
NIH consensus conference (1995) Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. Jama 273: 491–7
Kinkel K, Hricak H, Lu Y et al. (2000) US characterization of ovarian masses: a metaanalysis. Radiology 217: 803–11
Ferrazzi E, Zanetta G, Dordoni D et al. (1997) Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ul-trasound Obstet Gynecol 10: 192–7
Kurjak A, Schulman H, Sosic A et al. (1992) Transvaginal ultrasound, color flow, and Doppler waveform of the postmenopausal adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 80: 917–21
Marret H, Tranquart F, Sauget S, Lansac J (2003) Apport du Doppler pour le diagnostic des tumeurs ovariennes. Indications, pertinence des critères diagnostiques. J Radiol 84: 1725–31
Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Anic T, Kosuta D (2000) Three-dimensional ultrasound and power doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol Oncol 76: 28–32
Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH et al. (1998) Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology 208: 103–10
Outwater EK, Schiebler ML (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the ovary. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2: 245–74
Outwater EK, Dunton CJ (1995) Imaging of the ovary and adnexa: clinical issues and applications of MR imaging. Radiology 194: 1–18
Togashi K (2003) Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 13Suppl 4: L87–104
Jung SE, Lee JM, Rha SE et al. (2002) CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 22: 1305–25
Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Yamaguchi M (2000) MRI of gynaeco-logical solid masses. Clin Radiol 55: 899–911
Forstner R, Hricak H, Occhipinti KA et al. (1995) Ovarian can-cer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 197: 619–26
Pannu HK, Cohade C, Bristow RE et al. (2004) PET-CT detection of abdominal recurrence of ovarian cancer: radiologic-surgical correlation. Abdom Imaging 29(3): 398–403
Pomel C, Dauplat J (2004) Prise en charge chirurgicale des tumeurs épithéliales malignes de l’ovaire. J Chir (Paris) 141: 277–84
Nelson BE, Rosenfield AT, Schwartz PE (1993) Preoperative abdominopelvic computed tomographic prediction of optimal cytoreduction in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 11: 166–72
Kawamoto S, Urban BA, Fishman EK (1999) CT of epithelial ovarian tumors. Radiographics 19 Spec No: S85-102; quiz S263-104
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag France
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balleyguier, C., Pomel, C. (2006). Interaction radiologue-chirurgien pour la prise en charge des cancers de l’ovaire. In: Les cancers ovariens. Abord clinique. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-30921-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-30921-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-25168-9
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-30921-2