Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidence et mortalité du cancer du col en France. Quelle relation avec le dépistage?

  • Chapter
Le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus

Part of the book series: Dépistage et cancer ((DC))

  • 296 Accesses

Conclusion

L’incidence du cancer du col de l’utérus a diminué depuis vingt ans en France grâce au dépistage spontané couvrant 60% des femmes de 25 à 65 ans mais sa mortalité reste élevée en raison de l’absence d’amélioration notable des traitements. Le frottis cervico-vaginal reste actuellement l’examen clé de ce dépistage qui devra être rendu, dans les années à venir, plus efficace, à l’image d’autres pays européens, en s’organisant et en s’ouvrant à l’ensemble de la population féminine française ciblée (25–65 ans).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Weidmann C, Schaffer P, Hedelin G et al. (1998) L’incidence du cancer du col de l’utérus régresse régulièrement en France. Bull Epidemiol Hebd 5: 17–9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schaffer P, Sancho-Garnier H, Fender M et al. (2000) Cervical cancer screening in France. Eur J Cancer 36: 2215–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P (1995) Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol 141: 680–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Brux J (1979) Natural history of the cervical precancerous lesions. Bull Cancer 66: 409–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartier R (1979) The role of colposcopy in the diagnosis and treatment of dysplasias and intra-epithelial carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Bull Cancer 66:447–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ostor AG (1993) Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 12: 186–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sastre-Garau X, Asselain B, Bergeron C et al. (1996) Precancerous and cancerous involvement of the uterine cervix. Results of a survey conducted by the “Genital Cancers” group of Ile-de-France, May 1990–May 1992, based on 8,805 biopsies. Bull Cancer 83: 400–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Nene SM et al. (1992) Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation alone. Cancer 69: 2796–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sparen P, Gustafsson L, Friberg LG et al. (1995) Improved control of invasive cervical cancer in Sweden over six decades by earlier clinical detection and better treatment. J Clin Oncol 13: 715–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nygard JF, Skare GB, Thoresen SO (2002) The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992–2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer. J Med Screen 9: 86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Day NE (1986) Screening for Cancer of the uterine cervix. Lyon IARC 199–212

    Google Scholar 

  12. Site Internet de l’association pour la prévention du cancer du col de l’utérus dans le Doubs. apcc25.free. fr. Résultats 1993–2001

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koutsky LA, Holmes KK, Critchlow CW et al. (1992) A cohort study of the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 in relation to papillomavirus infection. N Engl J Med 327: 1272–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell H, Medley G, Giles G (1990) Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s. BMJ 300: 1622–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz PE, Hadjimichael O, Lowell DM et al. (1996) Rapidly progressive cervical cancer: the Connecticut experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 1105–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bolla M, Berland E, Salvat J et al. (2000) Fast growing cervical carcinomas. A retrospective analysis of 20 IB-IIB FIGO. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 90: 81–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al. (1997) Screening histories of incidence cases of cervical cancer and high grade SIL. A comparison. Acta Cytol 41: 1431–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurman RJ, Schiffman MH, Lancaster WD et al. (1988) Analysis of individual human papillomavirus types in cervical neoplasia: a possible role for type 18 in rapid progression. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159: 293–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hildesheim A, Hadimichael O, Schwartz PE et al. (1999) Risk factors for rapid onset cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: 571–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. DeMay RM (1996) Cytopathology of false negatives preceding cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 1110–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Siemens FC, Boon ME, Kuypers JC et al. (2004) Population-based cervical screening with a 5-year interval in the Netherlands. Stabilization of the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions in the screened population. Acta Cytol 48: 348–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arbyn M, Schenck U (2000) Detection of false negative Pap smears by rapid reviewing. A metaanalysis. Acta Cytol 44: 949–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koss LG, Sherman ME, Cohen MB et al. (1997) Significant reduction in the false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System) Hum Pathol 28: 1196–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Monsonego J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C et al. (2001) Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer 84: 360–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coste J, De Cremoux P, Le Galès C et al. (2003) “Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening” Br Med J 326: 733–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dalstein V, Riethmuller D, Pretet JL et al. (2003) Persistence and load of highrisk HPV are predictors for development of high-grade cervical lesions: a longitudinal French cohort study. Int J Cancer 106: 396–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coste, De Cremoux, Coste J et al. (2003) Efficiency of the Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology Am J Clin Pathol 120: 492–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group (2003) Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 1383–92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de chirurgie cancérologique, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif

    S. Camatte, P. Morice & D. Castaigne

  2. Service d’oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif

    P. Pautier & C. Lhommé

  3. Service de radiothérapie, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif

    C. Haie-Meder

  4. Service d’anatomo-pathologie, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39, rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805, Villejuif

    P. Duvillard

Authors
  1. S. Camatte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Morice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Pautier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Lhommé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Haie-Meder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Duvillard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. Castaigne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Camatte, S. et al. (2005). Incidence et mortalité du cancer du col en France. Quelle relation avec le dépistage?. In: Le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus. Dépistage et cancer. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28699-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28699-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-22083-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-28699-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation