Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus pp 163–171Cite as

La communication vers les femmes et leur information

  • Chapter

  • 299 Accesses

Part of the book series: Dépistage et cancer ((DC))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J et al. (1997) Screening histories of incident cases of cervical cancer and high grade SIL. A comparison. Acta Cytol 41: 1431–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al. (1995) The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health 85:791–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenter GG, Schoonderwald EM, Koelma IA (1996) The cytological screening history of I 469 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the Cervix uteri: does interval carcinoma exist? Acta Obst Gynecol 75: 400–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Labbe S, Petitjean A (1999) Faux-négatifs et assurance qualité en cytology cervico-utérine. Ann Pathol 19: 457–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Macgregor JE, Campbell MK, Mann EM et al. (1994) Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in north east Scotland shows fall in incidence and mortality from invasive cancer with concomitant rise in preinvasive disease. Br Med J 308: 1407–11

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoolland M, Allpress S, Sterrett GF (2002) Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: Sensitivity of diagnosis by cervical smear and cytologic patterns and pitfalls in 24 cases. Cancer 96: 5–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bull AR, Hatton P, Bensley DC et al. (1994) Standardized mortality from cervical cancer: a measure of performance? J Public Health Med 16: 16–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nygard JF, Skare GB, Thoresen SO (2002) The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992–2000: Changes in pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer. J Med Screen 9(2): 86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J et al. (1999) Effect of screening on incidence and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: Evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ 318: 904–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peto J, Giluan C, Fletcher O et al. (2004) The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 364: 249–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sancho-Garnier H (1997) Dépistage des cancers féminins. La santé de l’homme 332: 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hakama M, Miller A, Day NE (1986) Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon no 76

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schaffer P, Renaud R (1989) La problématique du dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus. Typologie des femmes de 20 à 65 ans. Enquête SOFRES

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forbes C, Jebson R, Martin-Hirsch P (2002) Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3) CD002834

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fender M, Schott J, Baldauf JJ (2003) Eve, une campagne régionale de dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus. Organisation, résultats à 7 ans et perspectives. Press Med 32: 1545–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Segnan N, Senore C, Giordano L et al. (1998) Promoting participation in a population screening programme for breast and cervical cancer: a randomised trial of different invitation strategies. Tumori 84: 348–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buehler SK, Parson WL (1997) Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial. CMA J, Sep 157(5): 521–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ronco G, Segnan N, Pont A (1991) Who has pap-tests? Variables associated with the use of pap-tests in absence of screening programmes. Int J Epidemiol 20:349–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW et al. (2004) A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun 9 Suppl 1: 71–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greimel ER, Gappmayer-Locker E, Girardi FL et al. (1997) Increasing women’s knowledge and satisfaction with cervical cancer screening. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, Dec 18(4): 273–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Munk C, Kjaer SK, Poll P et al. (1998) Cervical cancer screening: Knowledge of own screening status among women aged 20–29 years. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand, oct 77(9): 917–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Département de gynécologie et d’obstétrique, Centre hospitalier Hautepierre, 1, avenue Molièere, 67098, Strasbourg Cedex 2

    J. -J. Baldauf

  2. Association EVE, 3, place du Cygne, 67000, Strasbourg

    M. Fender

Authors
  1. J. -J. Baldauf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Fender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baldauf, J.J., Fender, M. (2005). La communication vers les femmes et leur information. In: Le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus. Dépistage et cancer. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28699-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-28699-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-22083-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-28699-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation