Abstract
This chapter provides a view of how due to the health systems and technologies development in the last century a series of functions have been developed to achieve an optimal health for the entire population with available resources. Considering the particularities of the imaging technology area, the authors describe in what manner the value of these technologies should be defined, what are the approaches proposed for assessing this value, both by academia and by several institutions and finally by looking specifically at the SPARTACUS case an approach to compare two diagnostic modalities in terms of their impact on patient outcome is described. The author’s description of the SPARTACUS project is particularly informative. The results of this project made the authors concluding that, although RCT are not commonly used in the context of evaluating diagnostic tests, its use allows for the assessment of a wider scope of outcomes that are arguably relevant from an HTA perspective.
References
Abad-Cardiel M, Alvarez-Álvarez B, Luque-Fernandez L, Fernández C, Fernández-Cruz A, Martell-Claros N (2013) Hypertension caused by primary hyperaldosteronism: increased heart damage and cardiovascular risk. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 66:47–52
Bailar JC III, Mosteller F (1992) Medical technology assessment. In: Medical uses of statistics. NEJM Books, Boston, pp 393–411
Banta DH, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and its assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 23–57
Carr JJ, Hendel RC, White RD, Patel MR, Wolk MJ, Bettmann MA, Douglas P, Rybicki FJ, Kramer CM, Woodard PK, Shaw LJ, Yucel EK (2013) Appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging: a methodology for the development of joint criteria for the appropriate utilization of cardiovascular imaging by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American College of Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:2199–2206
Daunt N (2005) Adrenal vein sampling: how to make it quick, easy, and successful. Radiographics 25:S143–S158
Dekkers T, Prejbisz A, Kool LJ, Groenewoud HJ, Velema M, Spiering W, Kołodziejczyk-Kruk S, Arntz M, Kądziela J, Langenhuijsen JF, Kerstens MN, van den Meiracker AH, van den Born BJ, Sweep FC, Hermus AR, Januszewicz A, Ligthart-Naber AF, Makai P, van der Wilt GJ, Lenders JW, Deinum J, SPARTACUS Investigators (2016) Adrenal vein sampling versus CT scan to determine treatment in primary aldosteronism: an outcome-based randomised diagnostic trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:739–746
Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR et al., PROMISE Study Investigators (2015) Outcomes of anatomic versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 372:1291–1300
Durand DJ, Lewin JS, Berkowitz SA (2015) Medical-imaging stewardship in the accountable care era. New Engl J Med 373:1691–1693
Facey K, Henshall C, Sampietro-Colom L, Thomas S (2015) Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of evidence production for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 31(4):201–206
Ford I, Norrie J (2016) Pragmatic trials. New Engl J Med 375:454–463
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Mak 11(2):88–94
Gazelle SG, Kessler L, Lee DW, McGinn T, Menzin J, Neumann P et al (2011) A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative effectiveness research. Radiology 261(3):692–698
Goodman CS (2014) HTA 101: introduction to health technology assessment. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine (US). https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/HTA_101_FINAL_7-23-14.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2017
Health Technology Assessment (2009) Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(Suppl. 1):10
Health Technology Assessment Network (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/health/technology_assessment/policy/network_en. Accessed 3 Mar 2017
Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP et al (2010) Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology 257:240–245
Henshall C, Schuller T, Mardhani-Bayne L (2012) Using health technology assessment to support optimal use of technologies in current practice: the challenge of “disinvestment”. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(3):203–210
HTA Core Model for Diagnostic Technologies (2008). http://www.eunethta.eu/outputs/hta-core-model-diagnostic-technologies-10r. Accessed 3 Mar 2017
INAHTA (2017). www.inahta.org. Accessed 21 Feb 2017
Keisler JM, Collier ZA, Chu E, Sinatra N, Linkov I (2014) Value of information analyses: the state of application. Environ Syst Decis 34:3–23
Kidholm K, Olhom AM, Birk-Olsen M, Cicchetti A, Fure B, Halmesmaki E et al (2015) Hospital managers’ need for information in decision-making- an interview study in nine European countries. Health Policy 119:1424–1432
Newby D et al., SCOT-Heart Investigators (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet; 385:2383–2391.
Oortwijn W. (2017) HTA and value: assessing value, making value-based decisions, and sustaining innovation. HTAi Policy Forum background paper. Edmonton: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi)
Patel SM, Lingam RK, Beaconsfield TI, Tran TL, Brown B (2007) Role of radiology in the management of primary aldosteronism. Radiographics 27:1145–1157
Riaz A, Hanger M, Carino T (2011) Comparative effectiveness research in the United States: a catalyst for innovation. Am Health Drug Benefits 4(2):68–72
Sampietro-Colom L (2012) Consider context and stakeholders. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(2):166–167
Sampietro-Colom L, Martin J (eds) (2016) Hospital-based health technology assessment: the next Frontier for health technology assessment. Springer-Verlag, London. 978-3-319-39203-5
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Kunz R, Craig J, Montori VM, Bossuyt P, Guyatt GH (2008) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 17:1106–1110
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA 307:2400–2409
Sorenson C, Drummond M, Kanavos P (2008) Ensuring value for money in health care. The role of health technology assessment in the European Union. European Observatory. Observatory Studies Series No. 11. World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health and Systems Policies. www.curo.who.int/pubrequest
WHA67.23 (2014) Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage. WHA Resolution; Sixty-seventh World Health Assembly. http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js21463en/. Accessed 3 Mar 2017
Zboromyrska Y, de la Calle C, Soto M, Sampietro-Colom L, Soriano A, Alvarez-Martínez M et al (2016) Rapid diagnosis of staphylococcal catheter-related bacteraemia in direct blood samples by real-time PCR. PLoS One 11(8):e0161684
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deinum, J., Restovic, G., Makai, P., van der Wilt, G.J., Colom, L.S. (2017). Healthcare Technology Assessment of Medical Imaging Technology. In: Donoso-Bach, L., Boland, G. (eds) Quality and Safety in Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_86
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_86
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42576-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42578-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)