Skip to main content

Image Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality and Safety in Imaging

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

Image interpretation is the core process of radiological workflow. Current visualization environments contain a set of tools to help in the annotation of relevant imaging findings. However, there still exist important challenges for interoperability between different platforms when working with annotated images. How the annotations and findings are reported is also evolving, moving from traditional descriptive texts towards item-based structured reports. Finally, thanks to the recent advances in the artificial intelligence science, specifically in machine learning algorithms it has been possible to implement a growing number of computer-aided detection solutions to assist radiologists in the image interpretation process. Image interpretation is under a process of paradigm shift, from traditional image reading through observation and free text reporting of the findings, towards the inclusion of new technologies in the loop such as computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD), imaging biomarker extraction, and structured reporting. The advance in interoperability between systems to standardize image annotation formats, together with the growing use of structured reporting and AI-assisted image reading, will shape radiology as one of the most relevant data sciences in the era of precision medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AIM web page. https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/AIM/Annotation+and+Image+Markup+-+AIM. Accessed 1 May 2017

  • Bosmans JML, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellino RA (2005) Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview. Cancer Imaging 5:17–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clunie DA (2000) DICOM structured reporting. PixelMed, Bangor, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, Kline TL (2017) Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 37(2):505–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterly KA, Blume HR, Flynn MJ, Samei E (2008) Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays. J Digit Imaging 21:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hype cycle for emerging technologies (2016) 19-07-2016. www.gartner.com. Accessed 1 May 2017

  • IHE Radiology Technical Committee (2012) IHE Radiology (RAD) white paper: management of radiology report templates, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • IHE Radiology Technical Committee (2015) IHE radiology technical framework supplement: management of radiology report templates (MRRT), pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí-Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri A (2017) Development and clinical integration. In: Imaging biomarkers. Springer, New York. isbn:978-3-319-43502-2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mongkolwat P, Rubin DL, Kleper V, Chen JJ, Siegel EL (2012) Structured reporting with the caBIG® Annotation and Image Markup (AIM) template builder for AIM Version 4.0; Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, IL November 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs R, Chun S, Lam B (2016) Display devices for diagnostic radiology. Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto Dos Santos D, Klos G, Kloeckner R, Oberle R, Dueber C, Mildenberger P (2017) Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform. Eur Radiol 27:424–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomar-Nadal A, Pérez Castillo C, Alberich-Bayarri A, García-Martí G, Sanz-Requena R, Marti-Bonmati L (2013) Integrando el informe de biomarcadores de imagen en el informe radiológico estructurado. Radiología SERAM 55:188–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Brown MS, Shih GL (2014) Visual interpretation with three-dimensional annotations (VITA): three-dimensional image interpretation tool for radiological reporting. J Digit Imaging 27:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J et al (2013) Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Alberich-Bayarri Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alberich-Bayarri, A. (2017). Image Interpretation. In: Donoso-Bach, L., Boland, G. (eds) Quality and Safety in Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_121

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2017_121

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42576-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42578-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics