Abstract
Reliable assessment of cardiac function is an important tool for diagnosis and prognosis of multiple cardiac and extracardiac diseases. Echocardiography and MRI are the most commonly used methods to evaluate cardiac function, but can be limited or contraindicated in certain patients. Functional evaluation with CT may play an important role in these patients and in those patients being evaluated for coronary artery disease. Functional imaging requires a retrospectively gated acquisition and special attention must be paid to the contrast injection technique for appropriate analysis. Left and right ventricular analysis is evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively. Quantitative measurements with CT have shown close correlation with values obtained with CMR. Acute and chronic infarcts and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies can have a characteristic appearance on imaging. Functional and volumetric measurements of the left atrium can be carried out with similar technique for evaluation of patients with mitral disease or atrial fibrillation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abecasis J, Dourado R, Ferreira A, Saraiva C (2009) Left atrial volume calculated by multi-detector computed tomography may predict successful pulmonary vein isolation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Eurospace 11:1289–1294
Akram K, Anderson HD, Voros S (2009) Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(6):1154–1160
Annuar BR, Liew CK, Chin SP, Ong TK, Seyfarth MT, Chan WL, Fong YY, Ang CK, Lin N, Liew HB, Sim KH (2008) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur J Radiol 65(1):112–119
Avelar E et al (2010) Comparison of the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography to measure left atrial volume. Am J Cardiol 106(1):104–109
Bastarrika G, Arraiza M, De Cecco CN, Mastrobuoni S, Ubilla M, Rabago G (2008) Quantification of left ventricular function and mass in heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and MRI: initial clinical experience. Eur Radiol 18(9):1784–1790
Bavelaar-Croon CD et al (2000) Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values. Radiology 217(2):572–575
Belge B, Coche E, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL (2006) Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16(7):1424–1433
Braunwald E (2008) Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. In: Peter L, Robert B, Douglas M Douglas Z. Saunders (eds) Elsevier, Philadelphia
Brodoefel H, Kramer U, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schroeder S, Kopp A, Heuschmid M (2007) Dual-source CT with improved temporal resolution in assessment of left ventricular function: a pilot study. Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1064–1070
Burgess MI, Mogulkoc N, Bright-Thomas RJ, Bishop P, Egan JJ, Ray SG (2002) Comparison of echocardiographic markers of right ventricular function in determining prognosis in chronic pulmonary disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:633–639
Busch S, Johnson TR, Wintersperger BJ, Minaifar N, Bhargava A, Rist C, Reiser MF, Becker C, Nikolaou K (2008) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol 18(3):570–575
Christiaens L et al (2009) A new method for measurement of LA volumes using 64-slice spiral CT: comparison with 2DE techniques. Int J Cardiol 131:217–224
de Geus-Oei LF et al (2011) Scintigraphic techniques for early detection of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity. J Nucl Med 52(4):560–571
de Jonge GJ et al (2011) Semi-automatic measurement of left ventricular function on dual source computed tomography using five different software tools in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 80(3):755–766
Dell’Italia LJ, Walsh RA (1989) Effect of intravenous metoprolol on left ventricular performance in Q-wave acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 63(3):166–171
Dewey M, Müller M, Teige F, Schnapauff D, Schink T, Hamm B, Lembcke A (2006) Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function. Invest Radiol 41(4):400–409
Dupont MVM, Dragean CA, Coche EE (2011) Right ventricle function assessment by MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 196(1):77–86
Ferencik M et al (2007) Analysis of cardiac dimensions, mass and function in heart transplant recipients using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. J Heart Lung Transplant 26(5):478–484
Fischbach R, Juergens KU, Ozgun M, Maintz D, Grude M, Seifarth H, Heindel W, Wichter T (2007) Assessment of regional left ventricular function with multidetector-row computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 17(4):1009–1017
Fishman AP, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Grippi MA, Senior RM, Pack AI (2008) Fishman’s pulmonary diseases and disorders, 4th edn. McGraw Hill Medical, New York
Gao Y, Du X, Liang L, Cao L, Yang Q, Li K (2012) Evaluation of right ventricular function by 64-row CT in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cor pulmonale. Eur J Radiol 81(2):345–353
Glower D Di, Lowe J Ei (2003) Left ventricular aneurysm. In: Cohn LH, Edmunds LH Jr (ed) Cardiac surgery in the adult. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 771–788
Greupner J, Zimmermann E, Hamm B, Dewey M (2011) Automatic versus semi-automatic global cardiac function assessment using 64-row computed tomography. Br J Radiol 34(5):367–374
Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Paul M, Fallenberg EM, Muller JG, Heindel W, Breithardt G, Fischbach R (2003) Evaluation of global left ventricular myocardial function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 38(10):653–661
Guo YK, Yang ZG, Ning G, Rao L, Dong L, Pen Y, Zhang TM, Wu Y, Zhang XC, Wang QL (2009) Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of left ventricular function and mass in patients with mitral regurgitation: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 19(9):2107–2116
Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Dodge HT (1979) Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. Circulation 59(3):421–430
Hausleiter J et al (2006) Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice. Circulation 113:1305–1310
Hausleiter J et al (2007) A new algorithm for ECG-based tube current modulation (MinDose) reduces radiation dose estimates in cardiac dual source CT angiography. Circulation 116:II_575
Helms AS et al (2009) Relation of left atrial volume from three-dimensional computed tomography to atrial fibrillation recurrence following ablation. Am J Cardiol 103:989–993
Jensen CJ, Jochims M, Hunold P, Forsting M, Barkhausen J, Sabin GV, Bruder O, Schlosser T (2010) Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: Influence of beta-blockers on left ventricular function: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 74(3):484–491
Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, Fallenberg EM, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2004) Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 230(2):403–410
Juergens KU, Roman F (2006) Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 16:342–357
Juergens KU et al (2008) Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT. Am J Roentgenology 190(2):308–314
Kang DK et al (2011) CT Signs of right ventricular dysfunction. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 4(8):841–849
Kircher B et al (1991) Left atrial volume determination by biplane two-dimensional echocardiography: validation by cine CT. Am Heart J 121:864–871
Ko YJ, Kim SS, Park WJ, Jeong JO, Ko SM (2011) Comparison of global left ventricular function using 20 phases with 10-phase reconstructions in multidetector-row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(3):603–611
Koch K, Oellig F, Kunz P, Bender P, Oberholzer K, Mildenberger P, Hake U, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2004) Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Rofo 176(12):1786–1793
Lee H, Kim SY, Gebregziabher M, Hanna EL, Schoepf J (2012) Impact of ventricular contrast medium attenuation on the accuracy of left and right ventricular function analysis at cardiac multi detector-row CT compared with cardiac MRI. Acad Radiol 19:(4):395–405
Lessick J, Ghersin E, Abadi S, Yalonetsky S (2008) Accuracy of the long-axis area-length method for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomograph. Can J Cardiol 24(9):685–689
Lin FY et al (2008) Cardiac chamber volumes, function, and mass as determined by 64-multidetector row computed tomography: mean values among healthy adults free of hypertension and obesity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(6):782–786
Helena M-N, Adams KF, Willis PW (1987) Evolution of regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in acute Q and non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 113(6):1369–1375
Heuschmid M, Rothfuss J, Schröder S, Küttner A, Fenchel M, Stauder N, Mahnken AH, Burgstahler C, Miller S, Claussen CD, Kopp AF (2005) Left ventricular functional parameters: comparison of 16-slice spiral CT with MRI. Rofo 177(1):60–66
Maffei E, Messalli G, Martini C, Nieman K, Catalano O, Rossi A, Seitun S, Guaricci AI, Tedeschi C, Mollet NR, Cademartiri F (2012) Left and right ventricle assessment with Cardiac CT: validation study vs. Cardiac MR. Eur Radiol 22(5):1041–1049
Mahnken AH, Spuentrup E, Niethammer M, Buecker A, Boese J, Wildberger JE, Flohr T, Sinha AM, Krombach GA, Günther RW (2003) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of left ventricular volume with ECG-gated multislice spiral CT: value of different image reconstruction algorithms in comparison to MRI. Acta Radiol 44(6):604–611
Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Busch P, Wildberger JE, Kühl HP, Günther RW (2005) Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol 15(4):714–720
Marcus FI et al (2010) Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia - proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation 121:1533–1541
Mastrobuoni S et al (2011) Allograft morphology and function in heart transplant recipients surviving more than 15 years by magnetic resonance imaging and dual-source computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(1):e62–e66
Melenovsky V, Borlaug B, Rosen B et al (2007) Cardiovascular features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus non-failing hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in the urban Baltimore community. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:198–207
Mo YH, Jaw FS, Wang YC, Jeng CM, Peng SF (2011) Effects of propranolol on the left ventricular volume of normal subjects during CT coronary angiography. Korean J Radiol 12(3):319
Mock MB et al (1982) Survival of medically treated patients in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS) registry. Circulation 66:562–568
Nevsky G, Jacobs JE, Lim RP, Donnino R, Babb JS, Srichai MB (2011) Sex-specific normalized reference values of heart and great vessel dimensions in cardiac CT angiograph. Am J Roentgenol 196:788–794
Plumhans C et al (2009) Comparison of manual, semi- and fully automated heart segmentation for assessing global left ventricular function in multidetector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 44(8):476–482
Port S, Cobb FR, Jones RH (1980) Effects of propranolol on left ventricular function in normal men. Circulation 61(2):358–366
Puesken M et al (2008) Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurement. Eur Radiol 18(10):2087–2094
Quiroz R et al (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109(20):2401–2404
Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B, Garcia A, Ferketich AK (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151(3):736–744
Rodevan O, Bjornerheim R, Ljosland M, Maehle J, Smith HJ, Ihlen H (1999) Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates. Int J Card Imaging 15:397–410
Salm LP, Schuijf JD, de Roos A, Lamb HJ, Vliegen HW, Jukema JW, Joemai R, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ (2006) Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr 7(4):308–314
Sarwar A et al (2009) Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(3):170–177
Savino G et al (2007) CT of cardiac function. J Thoracic Imaging 22(1):86–100
Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, Voigtlander T, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J (2007) Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiologica 48:30–35
Seneviratne SK et al (2010) Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(4):375–383
Setser RM, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH (2000) Quantification of left ventricular function with magnetic resonance images acquired in real time. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:430–438
Slart R et al (2004) Comparison of gated PET with MRI for evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 45(2):176–182
Staskiewicz G et al (2010) Widening of coronary sinus in CT pulmonary angiography indicates right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 20:1615–1620
Stojanovska J et al (2011) Reference normal absolute and indexed values from ECG-gated MDCT: left atrial volume, function, and diameter. Am J Roentgenology 197(3):631–637
Stollfuss JC et al (1998) Regional myocardial wall thickening and global ejection fraction in patients with low angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by visual and quantitative resting ECG-gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin single-photon emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med 25(5):522–530
Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, Niel J, Ebner C, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, Schmidt F, Galuschky C, Schummers G, Lang RM, Nesser HJ (2006) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 114(7):654–661
Takx RA, Moscariello A, Schoepf UJ, Barraza JM Jr, Nance JW Jr, Bastarrika G, Das M, Meyer M, Wildberger JE, Schoenberg SO, Fink C, Henzler T (2012) Quantification of left and right ventricular function and myocardial mass: comparison of low-radiation dose 2nd generation dual-source CT and cardiac MRI. Eur J Radiol 81(4):e598–e604
Taylor DO et al (2008) Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult heart transplant report—2008. J Heart Lung Transplant 27(9):943–956
Taylor AJ et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864–1894
Tsang TS et al (2006) Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1018–1023
van der Vleuten PA et al (2006) Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literature. Acta Radiol 47(10):1049–1057
van der Vleuten PA, de Jonge GJ, Lubbers DD, Tio RA, Willems TP, Oudkerk M, Zijlstra F (2009) Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRI. Eur Radiol 19(2):271-277
van Ooijen PM, de Jonge GJ, Oudkerk M (2012) Informatics in radiology: postprocessing pitfalls in using CT for automatic and semiautomatic determination of global left ventricular function. Radiographics 32(2):589–599
Wen Z, Zhang Z, Yu W, Fan Z, Du J, Lv B (2010) Assessing the left atrial phasic volume and function with dual-source CT: comparison with 3T MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:88–92
Wu YW, Tadamura E, Kanao S, Yamamuro M, Okayama S, Ozasa N, Toma M, Kimura T, Kita T, Marui A, Komeda M, Togashi K (2008a) Left ventricular functional analysis using 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with left ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Cardiology 109(2):135–142
Wu YW, Tadamura E, Yamamuro M, Kanao S, Okayama S, Ozasa N, Toma M, Kimura T, Komeda M, Togashi K (2008b) Estimation of global and regional cardiac function using 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison study with echocardiography, gated-SPECT and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol 128(1):69–76
Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kubo S, Toyoda H, Nishina T, Ohba M, Hosokawa R, Kimura T, Tamaki N, Komeda M, Kita T, Konishi J (2005) Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging.Radiology 234(2):381–390
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agrawal, R., Abbara, S. (2013). CT Assessment of Global and Regional Cardiac Function: State of the Art. In: Schoepf, U., Bamberg, F., Ruzsics, B., Vliegenthart, R., Bastarrika, G. (eds) CT Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion and Viability. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2012_790
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2012_790
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33878-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33879-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)