Skip to main content

The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation

  • Chapter

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (Med Radiol Diagn Imaging)

Abstract

We present a wide variety of experimental data indicating that linear no-threshold theory (LNT) greatly exaggerates the cancer risk from low level radiation. LNT is based on cancer initiating hits on DNA molecules, but many other factors affect the progression from DNA damage to a fatal tumor, such as availability of DNA repair enzymes, immune response, and cell suicide. Data are presented to show that these are generally stimulated by low level radiation (LLR) and suppressed by high doses that serve as calibrations for LNT. Since the great majority of cancers are caused by natural chemical processes, the protection against these provided by LLR may make LLR beneficial rather than harmful. Genes turned on and turned off by LLR are often different from those affected by high doses. Direct studies of cancer risk vs dose are reviewed: animal experiments generally indicate that LNT exaggerates the risk of low level radiation, and the same is true of most data on humans except possibly where dose rates are very high. Data show that the time delay between receipt of dose and cancer death increases with decreasing dose, which means that, with low level radiation, death from natural causes will often occur first. This implies an effective threshold. Responses to this type of information by various official and prestigious groups charged with estimating cancer risks from radiation are reviewed.

Keywords

  • Cancer Risk
  • Chromosome Aberration
  • Priming Dose
  • Challenge Dose
  • Radon Exposure

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_401
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-24535-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

References

  • Anderson RE (1992) Effects of low dose radiation on the immune response. In: Calabrese EJ (ed) Biological effects of low level exposures to chemicals and radiation, Lewis, Chelsea, pp 95–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurengo A et al (2005) Dose–effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low dose ionizing radiation. http://cnts.wpi.edu/rsh/docs/FrenchAcads-EN-FINAL.pdf

  • Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Raaphorst GP, Mitchel REJ (1996) Low dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Radiat Res 146:369–373

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berrington A, Darby SC, Weiss HA, Doll R (2001) 100 years of observation on British radiologists; mortality from cancer and other causes, 1897–1997. Br J Radiol 74:507–519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenbecker R (2010) Low dose pre-treatment for radiotherapy. Dose Response 8:534–553

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner WN (2004) Phenomena leading to cell survival values which deviate from linear-quadratic models. Mutation Res 568:33–39

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boothman DA et al (1996) Altered G1 checkpoint control determines adaptive survival responses to ionizing radiation. Mutation Res 358:143–153

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks AL (2011) Is a dose rate effectiveness factor needed following exposure to low total radiation doses delivered at low dose rates. Health Phys 100:262

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai L, Liu SZ (1990) Induction of cytogenic adaptive response of somatic and germ cells in vivo and in vitro by low dose X-irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol 58:187–194

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardis E et al (1995) Effects of low dose and low dose rates of external ionizing radiation: Cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat Res 142:117–132

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardis et al (2007) The 15 country collaborative study of cancer risk among radiation workers in the nuclear industry. Radiation Res 167:396–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffey JT, Rosenthal DS, Moloney WC, Hellman S (1976) Total body radiation as treatment for lymphosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1:399–405

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WL et al (2004) Is chronic radiation an effective prophylaxis against cancer?, J Am Physicians and Surgeons 9:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi NC, Timothy AR, Kaufman SD, Carey RW, Aisenberg AC (1979) Low dose fractionated whole body irradiation in the treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer 43:1636–1642

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (1980) The cancer risk from low level radiation. Health Phys 39:659–678

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (1995) Test of the Linear no-threshold theory of radiation carcinogenesis for inhaled radon decay products. Health Phys 68:157–174

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (1998) The cancer risk from low level radiation. Radiat Res 149:525–526

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (2000) Updates and extensions to tests of the Linear no-threshold theory. Technology 7:657–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (2006) Test of the Linear no-threshold theory; rationale for procedures. Dode Response 3:369–390

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MA et al (2005) Low dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenic radioadaptive response. Radiat Res 164:369–382

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrady J, Lermbcke J, Thai DM (2010) Kritische Stellungnahme zu den epidemiologischen Grundlagen der emofohlenen Richtwerte der Radonkonzentration in Wohnungen- Ergebnisse einschlägiger Srudien in Sachsen RADIZ Schlema e.V.; Tagungsband der 5. Biophysikalischen Arbeitstagung in Bad Schlema, 10. - 20. Juni 2010: Biologische Wirkung niedriger Strahlendosen- Natürliche Strahlenexposition, Radonbalneotherapie und Strahlenschutz

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis HG, Boice JD, Hrubec Z, Monson RR (1989) Cancer mortality in a radiation-exposed cohort of Massachusetts tuberculosis patients. Cancer Res 49:6130–6136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty TF, Mays CW (1969) In: Radiation Induced Cancer, International Atomic Energy Agency. Medical Physics Publishing Madison, p 361ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Duport P (2001) A data base of cancer induction by low-dose radiation in mammals: overview and initial observations, Second Conference of the World Council of Nuclear Workers (WUNOC). Dublin, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans RD (1974) Radium in man. Health Phys 27:497–510

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen LE (2005a) Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. Brit J Radiol 78:3–7

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen LE (2005b) Low doses of ionizing radiation: relationship between biological benefit and damage induction, a synopsis. World J Nuc Med 4:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen LE, Brooks AL, Morgan WF (2011) Biological consequences and health risks of low-level exposure to ionizing radiation: Commentary on the Workshop. Health Phys 100:247–259

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel MP, Biskis BO (1969) Pathological consequences of radiostrontium administered to fetal and infant dogs. Radiation biology of the fetal and juvenile mammal, AEC Symposium Series, vol. 17. In: Proceedings of the 9th Hanford Biology Symposium, pp 543–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel MP, Biskis BO (1962) Toxicity of Plutonium in mice. Health Phys 8:565–579

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel MP, Biskis BO (1968) Prog Exp Tumor Res 10:72ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel T, Holbrook NJ (2000) Oxidants, oxidative stress, and the biology of aging. Nature 408:239–247

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fornalski KW (2010) The healthy worker effect in nuclear industry workers. Dose Response 8:125–147

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz-Niggli H, Schaeppi-Buechi C (1991) Adaptive response to dominant lethality of mature and immature oocytes of D. Melanogaster to low doses of ionizing radiation: effects in repair-proficient and repair deficient strains. Int J Radiat Biol 59:175–184

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiassi-nejad M, Mortazavi SMJ, Beitollahi M, Cameron JR et al (2002) Very high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran: preliminary biological studies and possible implications. Health Phys 82:87–93

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert ES, Petersen GR, Buchanan JA (1989) Mortality of workers at the Hanford site: 1945–1981. Health Phys 56:11–25

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golder-Novoselsky E, Ding LH, Chen F, Chen DJ (2002) Radiation response in HSF cDNA microarray analysis, DOE Low dose radiation research program Workshop III. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gridley G et al (1999) Is there a healthy worker effect for cancer incidence among women in Sweden? Am J Ind Med 36:193–199

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto S, Shirato H, Hosokawa M et al (1999) The suppression of metastases and the change in host immune response after low-dose total body irradiation in tumor bearing rats. Radiat Res 151:717–724

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Physics Society (HPS) (1996) Radiation Risk in Perspective: Position Statement of the Health Physics Society (adopted January 1996). Health Physics Society Directory and Handbook, 1998–1999, p 238. Also at http://www.hps.org

  • Heidenreich WF, Paretzke HG, Jacob B (1997) No evidence for increased tumor risk below 200 mSv in the atomic bomb survivor data. Radiat Envoron Biophys 36:205–207

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howe GR (1995) Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate dose rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study. Radiat Res 142:295–304

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang SL et al (2008) Estimates of relative risks for cancer in a population after prolonged low dose rate radiation exposure. Radiat Res 170:143–148

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ina Y, Sakai K (2005) Activation of immunological network by chronic low dose rate irradiation in wild type mouse strains: analysis of immune cell populations and surface molecules. Int J Radiat Biol 81:721–729

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ina Y et al (2005) Suppression of thymic lymphoma induction by life-long low dose rate irradiation accompanied by immune activation of C57BL/6 mice. Radiat Res 163:153–158

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworowski J (2010) Observations on the Chernobyl disaster and LNT. Dose Response 8:148–171

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski JM (2011) Non-radiation causes of carcinogenesis in the atomic bomb survivors. Health Phys 100:309

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey KT, Memisoglu A, Frenkel A, Liber HL (1991) Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of X-rays are less susceptible to radiation induced mutagenesis. Mutat Res 263:197–201

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kondo S (1993) Health effects of low level radiation. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, pp 85–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshurnikova NA et al (2002) Studies of the Mayak nuclear workers: health effects. Radiat Environ Biophys 41:29–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kostyuchenko VA, Krestina LY (1994) Long term irradiation effects in the population evacuated from the East-Urals radioactive trace area. Sci Total Environ 142:119–125

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski D et al (2005) Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case–control studies. Epidemiology 16:137–145

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Le XC, Xing JZ, Lee J, Leadon SA, Weinfeld M (1998) Inducible repair of thymine glycol detected by an ultrasensitive assay for DNA damage. Science: 280:1066–1069

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SJ (1992) Multilevel mechanisms of stimulatory effect of low dose radiation on immunity. In: Sugahara T, Sagan LA, Aoyama T (eds) Low Dose Irradiation and Biological Defense Mechanisms. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, pp 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SZ (2003) Non-lineardose–response relationship in the immune system following exposure to ionizing radiation: mechanisms and implications, Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxicol Med 1:71–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu SZ (2007) Cancer control related to stimulation of immunity by low-dose radiation. Dose–Response 5:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Makinodan T, James SJ (1990) T cell potentiation by low dose ionizing radiation: possible mechanisms. Health Phys 59:29–34

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makinodan T (1992) Cellular and sub-cellular alteration in immune cells induced by chronic intermittent exposure in vivo to very low dose of ionizing radiation and its ameliorating effects on progression of autoimmune disease and mammary tumor growth. In: Sugahara T, Sagan LA, Aoyama T (eds) Low dose irradiation and biological defense mechanisms. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, pp 233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Matanoski GM (1991) Health effect of low level radiation in shipyard workers, Final report. Report No. DOE DE-AC02–79 EV10095; U.S. Dept of Energy See Tables 3.6B and 3.6D

    Google Scholar 

  • Matanoski GM (2008) Risk of radiation in U.S. shipyard workers. J. Radiation Res.49:83–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel REJ (2010) The dose window for radiation protective adaptive response. Dose Response 8:192–208

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Miller AB, Howe GR, Sherman GJ et al (1989) Mortality from breast cancer after irradiation during fluoroscopic examinations in patients being treated for tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 321:1285–1289

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RC, Randers-Pehrson G, Geard CR, Hall EJ, and Brenner DJ (1999) The oncogenic transforming potential of the passage of single alpha particles through mammalian cell nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel REJ, (2006) Low doses of radiation are protective in vitro and in vivo: Evolutionary origins. Dose-Response 4:75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel REJ (2007) Low doses of radiation reduce risk in vivo. Dose Response 5:1–10

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel REJ et al (2003) Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer prone, radiation sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice. Radiat Res 159:320–327

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan AK et al (2003) Cancer and other causes of mortality among radiologic technicians in the United States. Int J Cancer 103:259–267

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monson RR (1986) Observations on the healthy worker effect. J Occup Med 28:425–433

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WF (2011) Radiation induced genomic instability. Health phys 100(3):280–281

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL, Vaeth M, Mabuchi K (1996) Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 12, Part 1, Cancer: 1950–1990. Radiat Res 146:1–27

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pollycove M, Feinendagen L (2001) Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment vs hormesis; Part 1. J Nuclear Med 42:17N–27N

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston DL et al (2004) Effect of recent changes in atomic bomb survivor dosimetry on cancer mortality risk estimates. Radiat Res 162:377–389

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raabe OG (1994) Three dimensional models of risk from internally deposited radionuclides. In: dosimetry internal adiation, Raabe OG (eds) Madison. Medical Physics, WI, pp 633–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath JL, Antoniono RJ (1998) Induction of a rapid response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation in vitro by low dose gamma radiation. Rad Res 149:517–520

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redpath JL, Lu Q, Lao X, Molloi S, Elmore E (2003) Low doses of diagnostic X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. Int J Radiat Biol 79:235–240

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers BE, Holmes KM (2008) Radio-Adaptive Response to Environmental Exposures at Chernobyl. Dose Response 6:209–221

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogel A et al (2005) Mortality of workers exposed to ionizing radiation at the French National Electricity company. Am J Ind Med 47:72–82

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • NCRP (2001) Evaluation of the linear non-threshold dose–response model for ionizing radiation, NCRP Publication 136. Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection, Measurements) (1995) Principles and application of collective dose to radiation protection, NCRP Publication 121. Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto K, Myogin M, Hosoi Y et al (1997) Fundamental and clinical studied on cancer control with total and upper half body irradiation. J Jpn Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 9:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott BR (2010) Special issue introduction. Dose–Response 8:122–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadley JD, Dai GQ (1992) Cytogenic and survival adaptive responses in G-1 phase human lymphocytes. Mutat Res 265:273–281

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GB, Grof Y, Navarette A, Guilmette RA (2011) Exploring biological effects of low level radiation from the other side of background. Health Phys 100:263–265

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tanooka H (2001) Threshold Dose–Response in radiation carcinogenesis: an approach from chronic beta-irradiation experiments and a review of non-tumor doses. Int J Radiat Biol 77:541–551

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RE, Nelson DF, Popkin Z (2008) Case-control study of lung cancer risk from residential radon exposure in Worcester County. Massachusetts Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokarskaya ZB, Okladlnikova ND, Belyaeva ZD, Drozhko EG (1997) Multifactorial analysis of lung cancer dose–response relationships for workers at the Mayak Nuclear Enterprise. Health Phys 73:899–905

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiana M, Aurengo A (2005) Dose effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Int J Low Radiat 2:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich RL, Storer JB (1979) Influence of gamma radiation on the development of neoplastic diseases in mice: II solid tumors. Radiat Res 80:317–324

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation) (1994) Report to the General Assembly, Annex B: Adaptive Response. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelz GL, Wilkinson CS, and Acquavelle JF (1983) An update of epidemiologic studies of plutonium workers. Health Phys 44 Suppl (1):493–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JX et al (2002) Cancer incidence and risk estimation among medical X-ray workers in China, 1950–1995. Health Phys 82:455–466

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka K (1991) Increased SOD activities and decreased lipid peroxide in rat organs induced by low X-irradiation. Free Radical Biol Med 11:3–7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yin E et al (2005) Gene expression changes in mouse brain after exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 79:759–775

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshinaga S et al (2004) Cancer risks among radiologists and radiologic technologists: review of epidemiologic studies. Radiology 233:313–321

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yukawa O et al (2005) Induction of radical scavenging ability and suppression of lipid peroxidation in rat liver microsomes following whole body low dose X-irradiation. J Radiat Biol 81:681–688

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkina SI et al (2003) Low doses of radiation decrease the level of spontaneous and gamma induced chromosomal mutagenesis in bone marrow cells of mice in vivo. Rariats Biol Radioecol 43:153–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author acknowledges a great debt to Myron Pollycove, Jerry Cuttler, and James Muckerheide for help in pointing out references involved in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard L. Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, B.L. (2011). The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation. In: Tack, D., Kalra, M., Gevenois, P. (eds) Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_401

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_401

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24534-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24535-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)