Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technical Basis of Radiation Therapy

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Radiat Oncol))

  • 4238 Accesses

Abstract

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix is a highly curable malignancy. Surgery is often used for early stages. For patients with more advanced disease the combination of external beam therapy with radiosensitizing chemotherapy combined with intracavitary radiotherapy offers excellent local control and disease free survival but requires meticulous attention to detail to ensure low complication rates

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adcock LL et al (1984) Carcinoma of the cervix, FIGO Stage IB treatment failures. Gynecol Oncol 18:218–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Au WW, Sierra-Torres CH, Tyring SK (2003) Acquired and genetic susceptibility to cervical cancer. Mutation Res 544:361–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle BM, Jhingran A, Yom S, Ramirez PT, Eifel PJ (2009) Patterns of regional recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:1396–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belinson JL, Doherty M, McDay JB (1984) A new technique for ovarian transposition. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:157–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar JP, Kaplan C, Specht R (1980) A rule of thumb for dose rate at point A for the Fletcher–Suit applicator. Br J Radiol 53:511–512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen RJ et al (1999) Influence of histologic type and age on survival rates for invasive cervical carcinoma in Taiwan. Gynecol Oncol 73:184–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coia L et al (1990) The patterns of care outcome study for cancer of the uterine cervix. Results of the second national practice survey. Cancer 66:2451–2456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cosin JA et al (1998) Pretreatment surgical staging of patients with cervical carcinoma: the case for lymph node debulking. Cancer 82:2241–2248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crook JM et al (1987) Dose–volume analysis and the prevention of radiation sequelae in cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 8:321–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deore SM et al (1991) The severity of late rectal and recto-sigmoid complications related to fraction size in irradiation treatment of carcinoma cervix stage III B. Strahlenther Onkol 167:638–642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavey R (2004) Incidence, pathophysiology and treatment of cervical cancer. Nursing Times 100:38–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunst J et al (2003) Anemia in cervical cancers: impact on survival, patterns of relapse, and association with hypoxia and angiogenesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:778–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eifel PJ et al (1990) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Prognosis and patterns of failure in 367 cases. Cancer 65:2507–2514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eifel PJ et al (1995) Time course and incidence of late complications in patients treated with radiation therapy for FIGO stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:1289–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • el-Baradie M, Inoue T, Inoue T, Murayama S, Tang JT, Yamazaki H et al (1997) HDR and MDR intracavitary treatment for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A prospective randomized study. Strahlenthera Onkol 173:155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erridge SC et al (2002) The effect of overall treatment time on the survival and toxicity of radical radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 63:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esche BA et al (1987) Reference volume, milligram-hours and external irradiation for the Fletcher applicator. Radiother Oncol 9:255–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg E, Kim RY, Meleth S, De Los Santos J, Spencer S (2006) Lowdose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: The University of Alabamaat Birmingham (UAB) experience. Brachytherapy 5:49–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrigno R, Nishimoto IN, Novaes PE, Pellizzon AC, Maia MA, Fogarolli RC et al (2005) Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1108–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fey MC, Beal MW (2004) Role of human papilloma virus testing in cervical cancer prevention. J Midwifery Women’s Health 49:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher GH (1973) Female pelvis: squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. In: Fletcher GH (ed) Textbook of radiotherapy. Saunders, London, p 620

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasinska A et al (2002) Prognostic significance of intratumour microvessel density and haemoglobin level in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Oncol 41:437–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaulet AL et al (1992) Combined radiotherapy and surgery: local control and complications in early carcinoma of the uterine cervix—the Villejuif experience, 1975–1984. Radiother Oncol 23:66–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh K et al (2001) Using a belly board device to reduce the small bowel volume within pelvic radiation fields in women with postoperatively treated cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 83:271–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greer BE, Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Apte SM, Campos SM, Chan J, Cho KR, Copeland L, Crispens MA, Dupont N, Eifel PJ, Gaffney DK, Huh WK, Kapp DS, Lurain JR III, Martin L, Morgan MA, Morgan RJ Jr, Mutch D, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Small W Jr, Teng N, Valea FA (2010) Cervical cancer. Natl Compr Canc Network 8:1388–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven K et al (1999) Current developments in the treatment of newly diagnosed cervical cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 13:275–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grinsky T, Rey A, Roche B et al (1993) Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinoma: a critical parameter in treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:1051–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F (2001a) Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 19:3745–3749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby PW et al (2001b) Long-term follow-up of RTOG 92–10: cervical cancer with positive para-aortic lymph nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:982–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grigsby PW et al (2004) Posttherapy [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in carcinoma of the cervix: response and outcome. J Clin Oncol 22:2167–2171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks GE, Herring DF, Kramer S (1983) Patterns of care outcome studies. Results of the national practice in cancer of the cervix. Cancer 51:959–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haie-Meder C, Potter R, Van Limbergen E et al (2005) Recommendations from Gynae-cological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I) Concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother Oncol 74:235–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harima Y et al (2002) Human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA associated with prognosis of cervical cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:1345–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Hernandez DM et al (2003) Association between high-risk human papillomavirus DNA load and precursor lesions of cervical cancer in Mexican women. Gynecol Oncol 90:310–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog TJ (2003) New approaches for the management of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90:S22–S27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horiot JC et al (1988) Radiotherapy alone in carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix according to G.H. Fletcher guidelines: a French cooperative study of 1383 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husseinzadeh N et al (1984) The preservation of ovarian function in young women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol 18:373–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICRU (1985) Dose and volume specification for reporting intracavitary therapy in gynecology. ICRU Report 38:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhingran A, Eifel PJ (2000) Perioperative and postoperative complications of intracavitary radiation for FIGO stage I–III carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:1177–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karolewski K et al (1999) Prognostic significance of pretherapeutic and therapeutic factors in patients with advanced cancer of the uterine cervix treated with radical radiotherapy alone. Acta Oncol 38:461–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz A, Eifel PJ (2000) Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix (see comment). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1417–1425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keys HM et al (1999) Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340:1154–1161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim RY et al (1989) Radiation alone in the treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix: analysis of pelvic failure and dose response relationship. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:973–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WC, Kim GE, Suh CO, Loh JJ (2001) High versus low dose rate intracavitary irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Jpn J Clin Oncol 31(9):432–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer C et al (1989) Radiation treatment of FIGO stage IVA carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 32:323–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H et al (1986) Prognosis of primary radiotherapy of cervix cancer in younger females (in German). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 46:800–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H et al (1987) The influence of nicotine abuse and diabetes mellitus on the results of primary irradiation in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 60:1–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera H, Potter R, Knocke TH, Baldass M, Kucera E (2001) High-dose versus low-dose rate brachytherapy in definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr 113:58–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutcher GJ et al (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys 21:581–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landoni F et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer (see comment). Lancet 350:535–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leibel S et al (1987) Radiotherapy with or without misonidazole for patients with stage IIIB or stage IVA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: preliminary report of a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:541–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieu D (1996) The Papanicolaou smear: its value and limitations (see comment). J Fam Pract 42:391–399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lukka H et al (2002) Concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for cervical cancer—a meta-analysis (see comment). Clin Oncol (Royal College of Radiologists) 14:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mashburn J, Scharbo-DeHaan M (1997) A clinician’s guide to Pap smear interpretation (see comment). Nurse Pract 22:115–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall WM et al (1984) Prognostic and treatment factors affecting pelvic control of Stage IB and IIA-B carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix treated with radiation therapy alone. Cancer 53:2649–2654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS, Fowler WC (1989) Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of bladder and rectal radiation dose and complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS et al (1983) Carcinoma of the cervix stage IB: results of treatment with radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9:45–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS et al (1985) Analysis of results of radiation therapy for stage II carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 55:956–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS et al (1986) Carcinoma of the cervix, stage III. results of radiation therapy. Cancer 57:148–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS et al (1987) Analysis of results of radiation therapy for stage IB carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 60:2195–2200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montana GS, Martz KL, Hanks GE (1991) Patterns and sites of failure in cervix cancer treated in the U.S.A. in 1978. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20:87–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mundt AJ, Lujan AE, Rotmensch J et al (2002) Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:1330–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mutic S et al (2003) PET-guided IMRT for cervical carcinoma with positive para-aortic lymph nodes—a dose-escalation treatment planning study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:28–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nag S et al (1999) The American brachytherapy society survey of brachytherapy practice for carcinoma of the cervix in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 73:111–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nag S et al (2002) The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for low-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix (see comment). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:33–48 (erratum 52:1157)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nag S, Cardenes H, Chang S et al (2004) Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: report from image-guided brachytherapy group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1160–1172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okkan S, Atkovar G, Sahinler I, Oner Dincbas F, Koca A, Koksal S et al (2003) Results and complications of high dose rate and low dose rate brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: cerrahpaÅŸa experience. Radiother Oncol 67:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orton CG, Seyedsadr M, Somnay A (1991) Comparisons of high and low dose rate remote afterloading for cervix cancer and the importance of fractionation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1425–1434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez CA et al (1984) Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. analysis of complications. Cancer 54:235–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez CA et al (1998) Tumor size, irradiation dose, and long-term outcome of carcinoma of uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:307–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez CA et al (1999) Radiation therapy morbidity in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: dosimetric and clinical correlation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:855–866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman SE (1999) Pap smears: screening, interpretation, treatment. Adolescent Medicine State Art Rev 10:243–254

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petereit DG, Sarkaria JN, Potter DM, Schink JC (1999) High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence—the University of Wisconsin experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peters WA III et al (2000) Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 18:1606–1613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Portelance L, Chao KS, Grigsby PW et al (2001) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:261–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potish RA, Deibel FC Jr, Khan FM (1982) The relationship between milligram-hours and dose to point A in carcinoma of the cervix. Radiology 145:479–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potish RA et al (1984) The utility and limitations of decision theory in the utilization of surgical staging and extended field radiotherapy in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv 39:555–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potish RA, Gerbi BJ (1986) Role of point A in the era of computerized dosimetry. Radiology 158:827–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potish RA et al (1989) The role of surgical debulking in cancer of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:979–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potish RA (1992) Cervix cancer. In: Levitt SH (ed) Technological basis of radiation therapy. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, p 289

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourquier H et al (1987) A quantified approach to the analysis and prevention of urinary complications in radiotherapeutic treatment of cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 13:1025–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randall ME, Ibbott GS (2006) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologix cancers: pitfalls, hazards, and cautions to be considered. Semin Rad Onc 16(3):138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D et al (2001) Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 218:776–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rose PG et al (1999) Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340:1144–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkaria JN, Petereit DG, Stitt JA, Hartman T, Chappell R, Thomadsen BR et al (1994) A comparison of the efficacy and complication rates of low dose-rate versus high dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaoka M et al (2001) Patterns of failure in carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy alone. Am J Clin Oncol 24:586–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlis A et al (1999) A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (see comment). Gynecol Oncol 73:177–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh AK et al (2003) FDG-PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommers GM et al (1989) Outcome of recurrent cervical carcinoma following definitive irradiation. Gynecol Oncol 35:150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms WW Jr et al (1992) Bulky endocervical carcinoma: a 23-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CS et al (2004) Preliminary report of using FDG-PET to detect extrapelvic lesions in cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph nodes on MRI/CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1506–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unal A et al (1981) An analysis of the severe complications of irradiation of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: treatment with intracavitary radium and parametrial irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 7:999–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner SE (2003) Cervical cancer. Lancet 361:2217–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Liu R, Ma B, Yang K, Tian J, Jiang L, Bai ZG, Hao XY, Wang J, Li J, Sun SL, Yin H (2010) High dose rate versus low dose rate intracavity brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervix cancer (Review). Cochrane Dadabase Syst Rev (7):CD007563

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney CW et al (1999) Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 17:1339–1348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willen H et al (1985) Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. VIII. survival and malignancy grading in patients treated by irradiation in Lund 1969–1970. Acta Radiol Oncol 24:41–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, MMC 494, 420 Delaware St. S.E, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Kathryn E. Dusenbery & Bruce J. Gerbi

Authors
  1. Kathryn E. Dusenbery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce J. Gerbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn E. Dusenbery .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institutet Stockholm Sweden, MMC 436, Dept.of Oncol-Pathol Karolinska, Delaware St. SE 420, Minneapolis, 55455, Minnesota, USA

    Seymour H. Levitt

  2. UC Davis Cancer Center, Dept. Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, X Street 4501, Sacramento, 95817, California, USA

    James A. Purdy

  3. School of Medicine, Dept. Radiation Oncology, Washington University, Forest Park Ave. 4511, St. Louis, 63108-2138, Michigan, USA

    Carlos A. Perez

  4. Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, 5042 SB, Netherlands

    Philip Poortmans

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dusenbery, K.E., Gerbi, B.J. (2011). Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer. In: Levitt, S., Purdy, J., Perez, C., Poortmans, P. (eds) Technical Basis of Radiation Therapy. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_279

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_279

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11571-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11572-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation