Skip to main content

Impact of Imaging on Negative Appendectomy Rate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 2303 Accesses

Abstract

A negative appendectomy is defined as the removal of a normal appendix during an urgent appendectomy performed because of suspected acute appendicitis. In this chapter, we will trace the historical acceptability of a negative appendectomy rate, negative appendectomy rates in the pre-CT era, and negative appendectomy rates in the CT era. Gender differences in the impact of CT on negative appendectomy rates will be reviewed. Controversies related to the role of CT in lowering negative appendectomy rates will be discussed. Acceptable rates of negative appendectomy in the CT era will be addressed. The impact of ultrasound on negative appendectomy rates and the impact of imaging on negative appendectomy rates in children also will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H et al (2000) Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 24:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate KE, Sivit SJ, Salvator AE (2001) Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin T, Bhende S, Chavda K et al (2009) CT scans and acute appendicitis: a 5 year analysis from a rural teaching hospital. J Gastroin Surg 13:1306–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D et al (1986) CT of appendicitis. AJR 147:705–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes BA, Behringer GE, Wheelock FC et al (1962) Treatment of appendicitis at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1937–1959). JAMA 180:122–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ et al (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QAJ et al (1997) Acute appendicitis—a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. Surg Endo 11:923–927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt M-M, Wahl WL (2003) Liberal use of CT scanning helps to diagnose appendicitis in adults. Am Surg 69:727–734

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee S (2008) Overtreated: why too much medicine is making us sicker and poorer. Bloomsbury Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell JR, Stafford ED (1955) The diminishing mortality from appendicitis. Ann of Surg 141:749–756

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FC, Hogle HH, Welling DR (1973) The fate of the negative appendix. Am J Surg 126:752–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chooi WK, Brown JA, Zetler P et al (2007) Imaging of acute appendicitis and its impact on negative appendectomy and perforation rates: The St. Paul’s experience. Can Assoc of Rad Jnl 58:220–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colson M, Skinner KA, Dunnington G (1997) High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. Am J Surg 174:723–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10 year study. Radiology 254:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Detmer DE, Nevers LE, Sikes ED (1981) Regional results of acute appendicitis care. JAMA 246:1318–1320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Egdahl RH (1964) Current mortality in appendicitis. Am J Surg 107:757–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E et al (1997) Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 173:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fish B, Smulewicz JJ, Barek L (1981) Role of computed tomography in diagnosis of appendiceal disorders. N Y State J Med 81:900–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T et al (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK (2008) Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med 26:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs JR, Schlamberg JS, Shortsleeve MJ et al (2002) Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. J Surg Res 106:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gale ME, Birnbaum S, Gerzof SG et al (1985) CT appearance of appendicitis and its local complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9:34–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F et al (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology 241:175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ et al (1999) Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA 282:1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graff L, Radford MJ, Werne C (1991) Probability of appendicitis before and after observation. Ann Emerg Med 20:503–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbach K (2002) The ramifications of specialty-dominated medicine. Health Aff 21:155–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC (2006) Comparison of colonic transit between polyethylene glycol and water as oral contrast vehicles in the CT evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR 187:1188–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson T, Rosenman LD (1964) Acute appendicitis—when is it right to be wrong? Am J Surg 108:306–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J et al (2004) Patient encounter times intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Am Soc Emergency Radiol 10:310313

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PT, Eng J, Moore CJ et al (2005) Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults. Emer Radiol 12:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PF (2001) Management of suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 88:1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Fishman EK, Siegelman SS (1983) Computed tomography and appendiceal abscess: special applicability in the elderly. J Comput Assist Tomogr 7:434–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones K, Pena AA, Dunn EL et al (2004) Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am J Surg 188:748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazarian KK, Roeder WJ, Mersheimer WL (1970) Decreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 119:681–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keyzer C, Pargov S, Tack D et al (2008) Normal appendix in adults: reproducibility of detection with unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT. AJR 191:507–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Lee CC, Song K-J et al (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emer Med 34:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA et al (1997) Index of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD et al (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J et al (1975) Appendicitis: a critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg 110:677–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS et al (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR 160:763–766

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B et al (2004) CT Scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:886–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D et al (2005) Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg 71:803–808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse BC, Roettger RH, Kalbaugh CA et al (2007) Abdominal CT scanning in reproductive-age women with right lower quadrant abdominal pain: does it reduce negative appendectomy rate and healthcare costs? Am Surg 73:581–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Musunuru S, Chen H, Rikkers LF et al (2007) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1417–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naoum JJ, Mileski WJ, Daller JA et al (2002) The use of appendiceal computed tomography scan decreases the frequency of misdiagnosis in cases of suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 184:587–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidis P, Hwang CM, Miller FH et al (2004) The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent. AJR 183:889–892

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA et al (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multidetector row CT. Radiology 235:879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perez J, Barone JE, Wilbanks TO et al (2003) Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis. Am J Surg 185:194–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18 year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B et al (2008) Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. NEJM 358:972–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW et al (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T et al (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. AJR 184:1802–1808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riber C, Tonnesen H, Aru A et al (1999) Observer variation in the assessment of the histopathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:46–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SCOAP (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg 248:557–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Garcia Pena BM et al (2004) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J Ped Surg 39:458–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Styrud J, Josephson T, Eriksson S (2000) Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. Int J Qual Health Care 12:65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JBCM (2003) Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 13:2278–2282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL (1996) Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA 276:1589–1594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner PL, Eachempatia SR, Soe K (2008) Defining the negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 144:276–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Reen DJ, Puri P (1996) Is a histologically normal appendix following emergency appendectomy always normal? Lancet 347:1076–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA et al (2000) Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. Surgery 128:145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Courtney A. Coursey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coursey, C.A., Moreno, R.D. (2012). Impact of Imaging on Negative Appendectomy Rate. In: KEYZER, C., Gevenois, P. (eds) Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_228

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_228

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17871-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17872-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics