Abstract
New diagnostic tools are used to lower the negative appendectomy rate. The human appendix can be safely removed because it has lost its function of cellulose digestion as found in the herbivorous cecum of our primate ancestors. A negative appendectomy should be avoided though because the removal of a normal appendix is accompanied with considerable morbidity and costs. Further diagnostic tools are, therefore, needed if on clinical grounds there is doubt about the diagnosis appendicitis. There is much debate about what to do with a normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy. Because in the large clinical studies false-negative laparoscopies are rare, it is safe to leave a normal appendix in place to avoid added morbidity and costs associated with the removal of normal appendix. Symptoms mimicking appendicitis are probably due to self-limiting diseases. Care should be taken to not miss a diagnosis that needs further therapy such as carcinoid tumors which appear in 0.5% of the non-inflamed appendices. During long-term follow the chance of developing appendicitis appears to be no higher than in a normal population. So there can be no rational reason for a “prophylactic appendectomy”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Addis DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Anderson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate inappendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41
Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB, Naidich DP, Birnbaum BA (1986) CT of appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 147:705–710
Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Siegel SE, Birnbaum BA (1991) Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 180:21–24
Barrat C, Catheline J-M, Rizk N, Champault GG (1999) Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendectomies? Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:27–31
Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136
Bijnen CL, van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20:215–219 discussion 220-1.
Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348
Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA (1997) Acute appendicitis: a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. Surg Endosc 11:923–927
Connor TJ, Garcha IS, Ramshaw BJ, Mitchell W, Wilson JP, Mason EM, Duncan TD, Dozier FA, Lucas GW (1995) Diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Am Surg 61:187–189
Dingemann J, Metzelder M, Kuebler JF, Ure B (2009) Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis in children: may a macroscopically normal appendix be left in situ? Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:153–156
Douglas T (2007) The vestigiality of the human vermiform appendix. A modern reappraisal. http://www.talkorigins.org
Franke C, Gerharz CD, Böhner H, Ohmann C, Heydrich G, Krämling HJ, Stock W, Rosen D, Kurpreugsch K, Röher HD (2002) Neurogenic appendicopathy: a clinical disease entity? Int J Colorectal Dis 17:185–191
Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK, Richardson DM, Sierzega GM, Reed JF (2008) Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med 26:39–44
Goodman M, Porter CA, Czelusniak J, Page SL, Schneider H, Shoshani J, Gunnell G, Groves CP (1998) Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:585–598
Gough IR, Morris MI, Pertnikovs EI, Murray MR, Smith MB, Bestmann MS (1983) Consequences of removal of a “normal”appendix. Med J Aus 1:370–372
Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481
Jadallah FA, Abdul-Ghani AA, Tibblin S (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 160:41–45
John H, Neff U, Kelemen M (1993) Appendicitis diagnosis today: Clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 17:243–249
Jones PF (2001) Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Active observation is often sufficient to make diagnosis. BMJ 322:615–616
Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K (2007) The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg 7:17
Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: Nonfocused appendiceal CT-review of 100 cases. Radiology 217:159–163
Kardong KV (2002) Vertebrates: Comparative anatomy, function, evolution, 3rd edn edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 510–515
Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ, Kim W, Suh G, Singer AJ (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6
Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R (2000) Yang Q Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633 Review
Kum CK, Sim EKW, Goh PMY, Ngoi SS, Rauff A (1993) Diagnostic laparoscopy: reducing the number of normal appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 36:763–766
Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1996) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 168:405–409
Lessin MS, Chan M, Catallozzi M, Gilchrist BF, Richards C, Manera L, Wallach MT, Luks FI (1999) Selective use of ultrasonography for acute appendicitis in children. Am J Surg 177:193–196
Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766
Moberg AC, Montgomery A (2000) Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 14:942–947
Moberg AC, Ahlberg G, Leijonmarck CE, Montgomery A, Reiertsen O, Rosseland AR, Stoerksson R (1998) Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1,043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 164:833–840 discussion 841
Moore K (1982) The Developing Human. WB Saunders Company, 3rd edn, ISBN0-7216-6472-5, p 242
Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120:71–74
Mutter D, Navez B, Gury J-F, Guiot P, Russier Y, Vix M, Marescaux J (1998) Value of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain. Am J Surg 176:370–372
Naganuma M, Iizuka B, Torii A, Ogihara T, Kawamura Y, Ichinose M, Kojima Y, Hibi T (2001) Tokyo G Club. Appendectomy protects against the development of ulcerative colitis and reduces its recurrence: results of a multicenter case-controlled study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1123–1126
Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE (1993) Randomized study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80:922–923
Pieper R, Kager L (1982) The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy: an epidemiologic study of 971 cases. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavia 148:45–49
Puig S, Hörmann M, Rebhandl W, Felder-Puig R, Prokop M, Paya K (2003) US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 226(1):101–104
Puylaert BCM, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, De Vries BC, Van der Werf SDJ, Dörr JPJ, Blok RAPR (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Eng J Med 317:666–669
Ramachandran P, Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Schwartz MZ (1996) Ultrasonography as an adjunct in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 4 year experience. J Pediatr Surg 31:164–167
Rao PM, Boland GW (1998) Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain. Clin Radiol 53:639–649
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, Sacknoff R (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CL (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Eng J Med 338:141–146
Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, Lawrason JN, Sacknoff R, Novelline RA (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. Am J Roentgenol 184:1802–1808
Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390
Russel MG, Dorant E, Brummer RJ, van de Kruijs MA, Muris JW, Bergers JM, Goedhard J, Stockbrügger RW (1997) Appendectomy and the risk of developing ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease: Results of a large case-control study. South limburg inflammatory bowel disease study group. Gastroenterology 113:377–382
Sandler RS (1998) Appendicectomy and ulcerative colitis. Lancet 352:1797–1798
Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, Perez-Rossello JM, Perlmutter RA, Thorsen A (1998) Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch Surg 133:373–377
Schwerk WB, Wichtrup B, Ruschoff J, Rothmund M (1990) Acute and perforated appendicitis: current experience with ultrasound-aided diagnosis. World J Surg 14:271–276
Semm K, Mettler L (1980) Progress in pelvic surgery via operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:121–127
Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, Venturero M, Papa MZ, Zippel DB (2010) The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 24:2197–2199
Shoshani J, McKenna MC (1998) Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:572–584
Shoshani J, Groves CP, Simons EL, Gunnell GF (1996) Primate phylogeny: morphological versus molecular results. Mol Phylogenet Evol 5:102–154
Siegel MJ, Carel C, Surratt S (1991) Ultrasonography of acute abdominal pain in children. JAMA 266:1987–1989
Sivit CJ, Dudgeon DL, Applegate KE, Borisa VJ, Berlin SC, Morrison SC, Myers MT, Weinert DM, Stallion A, Grisoni ER (2000) Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: Helical CT. Radiology 216:430–433
Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA, Westmoreland M, Jones RC, Fisher TL, McCarty TM (1999) The Role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178:485–489
Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, McKeon JGK, Tanner WA, Keane FBV (2000) Should an appendix that looks ‘normal’ be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 166:388–389
Thorell A, Grondal S, Schedvins K, Wallin G (1999) Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in fertile women with suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 165:751–754
Tijtgat SHAJ, Bakker XR, Butzelaar RMJM (1998) Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:918–920
Ure BM, Bax NMA, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35:1170–1173
Van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, Van Eerten PV, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2000) Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 14:938–941
Van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–255
van den Broeck WT, Bijnen BB, Rijbroek B, Gouma DJ (2002) Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 168:349–354
Verroken R, Penninckx F, Van Hoe L, Geboes K, Kerremans R (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and surgical decision-making in patients referred for suspicion of appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg 96:158–160
Wade DS, Morrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB (1993) Accuracy of Ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch Surg 128:1039–1046
Wang Y, Reen DJ, Puri P (1996) A histologically normal appendix following emergency appendicectomy alway normal? Lancet 347:1076–1079
Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, Rothmund M (1998) Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 164:201–209
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van den Broeck, W.T. (2012). Negative Appendectomy Rate and Implications of Removing a Normal Appendix. In: KEYZER, C., Gevenois, P. (eds) Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_213
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_213
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17871-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17872-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)