Skip to main content

Negative Appendectomy Rate and Implications of Removing a Normal Appendix

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 2359 Accesses

Abstract

New diagnostic tools are used to lower the negative appendectomy rate. The human appendix can be safely removed because it has lost its function of cellulose digestion as found in the herbivorous cecum of our primate ancestors. A negative appendectomy should be avoided though because the removal of a normal appendix is accompanied with considerable morbidity and costs. Further diagnostic tools are, therefore, needed if on clinical grounds there is doubt about the diagnosis appendicitis. There is much debate about what to do with a normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy. Because in the large clinical studies false-negative laparoscopies are rare, it is safe to leave a normal appendix in place to avoid added morbidity and costs associated with the removal of normal appendix. Symptoms mimicking appendicitis are probably due to self-limiting diseases. Care should be taken to not miss a diagnosis that needs further therapy such as carcinoid tumors which appear in 0.5% of the non-inflamed appendices. During long-term follow the chance of developing appendicitis appears to be no higher than in a normal population. So there can be no rational reason for a “prophylactic appendectomy”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addis DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate inappendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB, Naidich DP, Birnbaum BA (1986) CT of appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 147:705–710

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Siegel SE, Birnbaum BA (1991) Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 180:21–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrat C, Catheline J-M, Rizk N, Champault GG (1999) Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendectomies? Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:27–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bijnen CL, van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, de Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2003) Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg 20:215–219 discussion 220-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR (2000) Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337–348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QAJ, Cuesta MA (1997) Acute appendicitis: a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young women. Surg Endosc 11:923–927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor TJ, Garcha IS, Ramshaw BJ, Mitchell W, Wilson JP, Mason EM, Duncan TD, Dozier FA, Lucas GW (1995) Diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Am Surg 61:187–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dingemann J, Metzelder M, Kuebler JF, Ure B (2009) Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis in children: may a macroscopically normal appendix be left in situ? Eur J Pediatr Surg 19:153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas T (2007) The vestigiality of the human vermiform appendix. A modern reappraisal. http://www.talkorigins.org

  • Franke C, Gerharz CD, Böhner H, Ohmann C, Heydrich G, Krämling HJ, Stock W, Rosen D, Kurpreugsch K, Röher HD (2002) Neurogenic appendicopathy: a clinical disease entity? Int J Colorectal Dis 17:185–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frei SP, Bond WF, Bazuro RK, Richardson DM, Sierzega GM, Reed JF (2008) Appendicitis outcomes with increasing computed tomographic scanning. Am J Emerg Med 26:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Porter CA, Czelusniak J, Page SL, Schneider H, Shoshani J, Gunnell G, Groves CP (1998) Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:585–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gough IR, Morris MI, Pertnikovs EI, Murray MR, Smith MB, Bestmann MS (1983) Consequences of removal of a “normal”appendix. Med J Aus 1:370–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 96:473–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadallah FA, Abdul-Ghani AA, Tibblin S (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 160:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • John H, Neff U, Kelemen M (1993) Appendicitis diagnosis today: Clinical and ultrasonic deductions. World J Surg 17:243–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PF (2001) Ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Active observation is often sufficient to make diagnosis. BMJ 322:615–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AE, Phillips AW, Jarvis JR, Sargen K (2007) The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens. BMC Surg 7:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: Nonfocused appendiceal CT-review of 100 cases. Radiology 217:159–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kardong KV (2002) Vertebrates: Comparative anatomy, function, evolution, 3rd edn edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 510–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Lee CC, Song KJ, Kim W, Suh G, Singer AJ (2008) The impact of helical computed tomography on the negative appendectomy rate: a multi-center comparison. J Emerg Med 34:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer M, Ohmann C, Leppert R (2000) Yang Q Macroscopic assessment of the appendix at diagnostic laparoscopy is reliable. Surg Endosc 14:625–633 Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kum CK, Sim EKW, Goh PMY, Ngoi SS, Rauff A (1993) Diagnostic laparoscopy: reducing the number of normal appendectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 36:763–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB (1996) Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. Am J Roentgenol 168:405–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessin MS, Chan M, Catallozzi M, Gilchrist BF, Richards C, Manera L, Wallach MT, Luks FI (1999) Selective use of ultrasonography for acute appendicitis in children. Am J Surg 177:193–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg AC, Montgomery A (2000) Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 14:942–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg AC, Ahlberg G, Leijonmarck CE, Montgomery A, Reiertsen O, Rosseland AR, Stoerksson R (1998) Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1,043 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Eur J Surg 164:833–840 discussion 841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore K (1982) The Developing Human. WB Saunders Company, 3rd edn, ISBN0-7216-6472-5, p 242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: Results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mutter D, Navez B, Gury J-F, Guiot P, Russier Y, Vix M, Marescaux J (1998) Value of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of right iliac fossa pain. Am J Surg 176:370–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naganuma M, Iizuka B, Torii A, Ogihara T, Kawamura Y, Ichinose M, Kojima Y, Hibi T (2001) Tokyo G Club. Appendectomy protects against the development of ulcerative colitis and reduces its recurrence: results of a multicenter case-controlled study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1123–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE (1993) Randomized study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80:922–923

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pieper R, Kager L (1982) The incidence of acute appendicitis and appendectomy: an epidemiologic study of 971 cases. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavia 148:45–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puig S, Hörmann M, Rebhandl W, Felder-Puig R, Prokop M, Paya K (2003) US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 226(1):101–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Puylaert BCM, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI, De Vries BC, Van der Werf SDJ, Dörr JPJ, Blok RAPR (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Eng J Med 317:666–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran P, Sivit CJ, Newman KD, Schwartz MZ (1996) Ultrasonography as an adjunct in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 4 year experience. J Pediatr Surg 31:164–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Boland GW (1998) Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain. Clin Radiol 53:639–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, Sacknoff R (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CL (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Eng J Med 338:141–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rhea JT, Halpern EF, Ptak T, Lawrason JN, Sacknoff R, Novelline RA (2005) The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients. Am J Roentgenol 184:1802–1808

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JK, Behravesh M, Dmitrewski J (2008) Macroscopic findings at appendicectomy are unreliable: implications for laparoscopy and malignant conditions of the appendix. Int J Surg Pathol 16:386–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russel MG, Dorant E, Brummer RJ, van de Kruijs MA, Muris JW, Bergers JM, Goedhard J, Stockbrügger RW (1997) Appendectomy and the risk of developing ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease: Results of a large case-control study. South limburg inflammatory bowel disease study group. Gastroenterology 113:377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler RS (1998) Appendicectomy and ulcerative colitis. Lancet 352:1797–1798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler JG, Shortsleeve MJ, Goldenson RS, Perez-Rossello JM, Perlmutter RA, Thorsen A (1998) Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? Arch Surg 133:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwerk WB, Wichtrup B, Ruschoff J, Rothmund M (1990) Acute and perforated appendicitis: current experience with ultrasound-aided diagnosis. World J Surg 14:271–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semm K, Mettler L (1980) Progress in pelvic surgery via operative laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:121–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro R, Eldar S, Sadot E, Venturero M, Papa MZ, Zippel DB (2010) The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 24:2197–2199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani J, McKenna MC (1998) Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:572–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoshani J, Groves CP, Simons EL, Gunnell GF (1996) Primate phylogeny: morphological versus molecular results. Mol Phylogenet Evol 5:102–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel MJ, Carel C, Surratt S (1991) Ultrasonography of acute abdominal pain in children. JAMA 266:1987–1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivit CJ, Dudgeon DL, Applegate KE, Borisa VJ, Berlin SC, Morrison SC, Myers MT, Weinert DM, Stallion A, Grisoni ER (2000) Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: Helical CT. Radiology 216:430–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA, Westmoreland M, Jones RC, Fisher TL, McCarty TM (1999) The Role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178:485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teh SH, O’Ceallaigh S, McKeon JGK, Tanner WA, Keane FBV (2000) Should an appendix that looks ‘normal’ be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy for acute right iliac fossa pain? Eur J Surg 166:388–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorell A, Grondal S, Schedvins K, Wallin G (1999) Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in fertile women with suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 165:751–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tijtgat SHAJ, Bakker XR, Butzelaar RMJM (1998) Laparoscopic evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:918–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ure BM, Bax NMA, Van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35:1170–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, Van Eerten PV, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2000) Selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc 14:938–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broeck WT, Bijnen AB, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ (2001) A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removed. Br J Surg 88:251–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck WT, Bijnen BB, Rijbroek B, Gouma DJ (2002) Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 168:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verroken R, Penninckx F, Van Hoe L, Geboes K, Kerremans R (1996) Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and surgical decision-making in patients referred for suspicion of appendicitis. Acta Chir Belg 96:158–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade DS, Morrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB (1993) Accuracy of Ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch Surg 128:1039–1046

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Reen DJ, Puri P (1996) A histologically normal appendix following emergency appendicectomy alway normal? Lancet 347:1076–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zielke A, Hasse C, Sitter H, Rothmund M (1998) Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 164:201–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim T. van den Broeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Broeck, W.T. (2012). Negative Appendectomy Rate and Implications of Removing a Normal Appendix. In: KEYZER, C., Gevenois, P. (eds) Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_213

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_213

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17871-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17872-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics