Skip to main content

Comparison of Antemortem Clinical Diagnosis and Postmortem Findings in Burn-Related Deaths

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Burns, Infections and Wound Management

Part of the book series: Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds ((RCTRRW,volume 2))

  • 1157 Accesses

Abstract

Burns are the most expensive traumatic injuries because of long hospitalization and expensive wound treatment. Burns can be categorized as flame, contact, radiation, scalding, chemical, microwave, and electricity. The author discusses the incidence and mortality of burns, and the discrepancies between premortem diagnoses and postmortem examination. He concludes that all of the burn-related deaths should undergo medicolegal autopsy. The findings revealed by the autopsy could make significant contributions to the treatment of burn cases with the interdisciplinary data sharing between clinicians and forensic experts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Vogelaers D, Hoste E, Blot S (2010) Severe burn injury in Europe: a systematic review of the incidence, etiology, morbidity, and mortality. Crit Care 14(5):R188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez JL, Pereperez SB, Bastida JL, Martinez MM (2007) Cost-utility analysis applied to the treatment of burn patients in a specialized center. Arch Surg 142(1):50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Roche R, Lüscher NJ, Debrunner HU, Fischer R (1994) Epidemiological data and costs of burn injuries in workers in Switzerland: an argument for immediate treatment in burn centres. Burns 20(1):58–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DiMaio VJ, DiMaio D (2001) Forensic pathology, 2nd edn. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pekka S, Knight B (2004) The pathology of burns. In: Pekka S, Knight B (eds) Bernard knight’s forensic pathology, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, p 322

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Rijn OJ, Bouter LM, Meertens RM (1989) The aetiology of burns in developed countries: review of the literature. Burns 15(4):217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar V, Mohanty MK, Kanth S (2007) Fatal burns in Manipal area: a 10 year study. J Forensic Legal Med 14(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kallinen O, Maisniemi K, Böhling T, Tukiainen E, Koljonen V (2012) Multiple organ failure as a cause of death in patients with severe burns. J Burn Care Res 33(2):206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kallinen O, Partanen TA, Maisniemi K, Böhling T, Tukiainen E, Koljonen V (2008) Comparison of premortem clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in patients with burns. Burns 34(5):595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishnan P, Frew Q, Green A, Martin R, Dziewulski P (2013) Cause of death and correlation with autopsy findings in burns patients. Burns 39(4):583–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomez R, Murray CK, Hospenthal DR, Cancio LC, Renz EM, Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Wolf SE (2009) Causes of mortality by autopsy findings of combat casualties and civilian patients admitted to a burn unit. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tuğcu H, Zor F, Toygar M, Balandız H (2015) Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and postmortem findings in burn-related deaths. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 21(6):491–495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fish J, Hartshorne N, Reay D, Heimbach D (2000) The role of autopsy on patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 21(4):339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyın Balandız .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Balandız, H., Gümüs, B. (2018). Comparison of Antemortem Clinical Diagnosis and Postmortem Findings in Burn-Related Deaths. In: Shiffman, M., Low, M. (eds) Burns, Infections and Wound Management. Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_111

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2018_111

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10685-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10686-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics