Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of NPWT in Treating Electrical Burn Wounds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pressure Injury, Diabetes and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Part of the book series: Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds ((RCTRRW,volume 3))

  • 1170 Accesses

Abstract

Complex wounds represent a challenge for the wound care specialist. The aim of treatment of electrical burn wounds is to achieve skin cover of the soft-tissue defects, prevent infection, and allow a good function of the affected anatomical segment. Surgical reconstructive techniques for soft-tissue defects covering, such as muscle flaps, free flap transfers, and cross-leg techniques, are frequently used in treating sequelae after electrical burns. In some cases, when the patient cannot be a candidate for free flap surgery the use of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective alternative that can minimize the traditional reconstructive surgery methods and can reduce the surface of the soft-tissue defect by filling it with new formed granulation tissue, creating a skin graft receptor bed.

This newer and simpler technique used for covering of exposed bone tissue can question the gold standard of plastic reconstructive surgery that utilizes muscle flaps as the only way to cover these defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gajbhiye AS, Meshram MM, Gajaralwar RS, Kathod AP (2013) The management of electrical burn. Indian J Surg 75(4):278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haberal MA (1995) An eleven-year survey of electrical burn injuries. J Burn Care Rehabil 16(1):43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalziel CF (1956) Effects of electric shock on man. IRE Trans Med Electron 5:44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Price T, Cooper MA, Marx J, Hockberger R, Walls R (2002) Electrical and lighting injuries Rosen's emergency medicine, 5th edn. Mosby, New York, pp 2010–2020

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wesner ML, Hickie J (2013) Long-term sequelae of electrical injury. Canadian Fam Phys 59(9):935–939

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee RC (1997) Injury by electrical forces: pathophysiology, manifestations, and therapy. Curr Probl Surg 34(9):677–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fish RM (1999) Electric injury, part I: treatment priorities, subtle diagnostic factors, and burns. J Emerg Med 17(6):977–983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rai J, Jeschke MG, Barrow RE, Herndon DN (1999) Electrical injuries: a 30-year review. J Trauma 46(5):933–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajantri B, Bharathi RR, Sabapathy SR (2012) Wound coverage considerations for defects of the lower third of the leg. Indian J Plast Surg 45(2):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Block L, King TW, Gosain A (2015) Debridement techniques in pediatric trauma and burn-related wounds. Adv Wound Care 4(10):596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Pirayesh A, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2016) Exposed tibial bone after burns: flap reconstruction versus dermal substitute. Burns 42(2):e31–e37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tevanov I, Enescu DM, Bălănescu R, Sterian G, Ulici A (2016) Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) to treat complex defect of the leg after electrical burn. Chirurgia (Bucur) 111(2):175–179

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP (2006) Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open tibia-fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(4):1315–1322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang C, Leavitt T, Bayer LR, Orgill DP (2014) Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing. Curr Probl Surg 51(7):301–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siqueira MB, Ramanathan D, Klika AK, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK (2016) Role of negative pressure wound therapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 7(1):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glass GE, Murphy GF, Esmaeili A, Lai LM, Nanchahal J (2014) Systematic review of molecular mechanism of action of negative-pressure wound therapy. Br J Surg 101(13):1627–1636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Webb LX, Pape HC (2008) Current thought regarding the mechanism of action of negative pressure wound therapy with reticulated open cell foam. J Orthop Trauma 22(10 Suppl):S135–S137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Orgill DP, Manders EK, Sumpio BE, Lee RC, Attinger CE, Gurtner GC, Ehrlich HP (2009) The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery 146(1):40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scherer SS, Pietramaggior G, Mathews JC, Prsa MJ, Huang S, Orgill DP (2008) The mechanism of action of the vacuum-assisted closure device. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:786–797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hasan MY, Teo R, Nather A (2015) Negative-pressure wound therapy for management of diabetic foot wounds: a review of the mechanism of action, clinical applications. Diabet Foot Ankle 6:27618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mouës CM, Heule F, Hovius SER (2011) A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence? Am J Surg 201:544–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borgquist O, Gustafsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M (2010) Micro- and macromechanical effects on the wound bed of negative pressure wound therapy using gauze and foam. Ann Plast Surg 64(6):789–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 38:563–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Adamkova M, Tymonova J, Zamecnikova I, Kadlcik M, Klosova H (2005) First experience with the use of vacuum assisted closure in the treatment of skin defects at the burn center. Acta Chir Plast 47:24–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with negative pressure wound therapy systems (2017) http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm244211.htm. Accessed 15 Feb 2017

  26. Owens BD, Wenke JC (2007) Early wound irrigation improves the ability to remove bacteria. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(8):1723–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nather A (2011) Role of negative pressure wound therapy in healing of diabetic foot ulcers. J Surg Tech Case Rep 3(1):10–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pham CT, Middleton P, Maddern G (2003) Vacuum-assisted closure for the management of wounds: an accelerated systematic review. ASERNIP-S Report No 37

    Google Scholar 

  29. Birke-Sorensen H, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Hudson D, Krug E, Berg L, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Depoorter M, Dowsett C, Dunn R, Duteille F, Ferreira F, Francos Martínez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S et al (2011) Evidence-based recommendations for negative pressure wound therapy: treatment variables (pressure levels, wound filler and contact layer) – steps towards an international consensus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(Suppl):S1–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Excell ET (2009) Use of negative pressure wound therapy for abdominal wounds: a review of recent literature. School of Physician Assistant Studies. Paper, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baranoski S, Ayello EA (2008) Wound care essentials: practice principles, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams &Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 152

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sachsenmaier S, Peschel A, Ipach I, Kluba T (2013) Antibacterial potency of V.A.C. GranuFoam Silver(®) dressing. Injury 44(10):1363–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Malmsjö M, Ingemansson R, Martin R, Huddleston E (2009) Negative-pressure wound therapy using gauze or open-cell polyurethane foam: similar early effects on pressure transduction and tissue contraction in an experimental porcine wound model. Wound Repair Regen 17(2):200–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karadsheh MJ, Nelson J, Wilcox R (2015) The application of skin adhesive to maintain seal in negative pressure wound therapy. Wounds 27(9):244–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Handschin AE, Jung FJ, Guggenheim M, Moser V, Wedler V, Contaldo C, Kuenzi W, Giovanoli P (2007) Surgical treatment of high-voltage electrical injuries. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 39(5):345–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Panuncialman J, Falanga V (2009) The science of wound bed preparation. Surg Clin North Am 89(3):611–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K, Romanelli M, Stacey MC, Teot L, Vanscheidt W (2003) Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 11(Suppl 1):S1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frykberg RG, Banks J (2015) Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Adv Wound Care 4(9):560–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W (1997) Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 38:553–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Borgquist O, Ingemansson R, Malmsjö M (2011) The influence of low and high pressure levels during negative-pressure wound therapy on wound contraction and fluid evacuation. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:551–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Malmsjö M, Gustafsson L, Lindstedt S, Gesslein B, Ingemansson R (2012) The effects of variable, intermittent, and continuous negative pressure wound therapy, using foam or gauze, on wound contraction, granulation tissue formation, and ingrowth into the wound filler. Eplasty 12:e5

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Romanian Pediatric Orthopedic Society, Bucharest, Romania

    Alexandru Ulici M.D., Ph.D.

  2. Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Emergency Hospital for Children “Grigore Alexandrescu”, Bucharest, Romania

    Alexandru Ulici M.D., Ph.D. & Iulia Tevanov M.D.

  3. Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

    Alexandru Ulici M.D., Ph.D., Dan Mircea Enescu M.D., Ph.D. & Alexandru Ulici M.D.

  4. President of the Romanian Burns Society, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emergency Hospital for Children “Grigore Alexandrescu”, Bucharest, Romania

    Dan Mircea Enescu M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Alexandru Ulici M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iulia Tevanov M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dan Mircea Enescu M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexandru Ulici M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Ulici M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tustin, CA, USA

    Melvin A. Shiffman

  2. Newport Beach, CA, USA

    Mervin Low

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ulici, A., Tevanov, I., Enescu, D.M., Ulici, A. (2018). The Use of NPWT in Treating Electrical Burn Wounds. In: Shiffman, M., Low, M. (eds) Pressure Injury, Diabetes and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Recent Clinical Techniques, Results, and Research in Wounds, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2017_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/15695_2017_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10700-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10701-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation