Skip to main content

Geodetic Remote Sensing of Ionosphere in Relation to Space Weather and Seismic Activity in B&H

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 149))

Abstract

Total electron content (TEC), along GNSS signal’s path in the ionosphere, is spatially and temporally highly variable. In addition, sudden disturbances in the ionosphere may occur on the global, regional or local level from external sources, such as space weather and seismic activity. Results of TEC investigation for mid-latitude ionosphere over B&H (Bosnia and Herzegovina) during seismic activity of medium intensity (4 < M < 5 Richter) and severe geomagnetic storm (St. Patrick’s Day in 2015) are presented. Analyses of relevant parameters such as solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field and geomagnetic activity are performed. Different analyses of TEC variations are carried out. Lower and upper bounds (LB and UB) are determined by 15-day running TEC median prior the day of consideration ± 2*standard deviation. TEC values which exceeded LB and UB are marked as anomalies. TECQUIET is calculated as mean TEC for five quietest days in a month regarding geomagnetic conditions to observe TEC residuals due to enhanced geomagnetic activity. Direct comparison of TEC values at different stations is also conducted. TEC deviations were in better agreement concerning GNSS stations located close to the epicentre. Both positive and negative anomalies were registered 2 weeks before the earthquake, with higher deviations during 7 days before, at stations located inside the earthquake preparation zone. The potential causes of these anomalies are discussed. Analysis of TEC response to the strongest geomagnetic storm in solar cycle 24 shows TEC deviations from 50% to even 150% compared to TECQUIET, where “positive ionospheric storm” is observed in the main phase and “negative ionospheric storm” in the recovery phase of the geomagnetic storm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

B&H:

Bosnia and Herzegovina

BiHPOS:

Bosnia and Herzegovina Positioning Service

CME:

Coronal mass ejection

EPN:

EUREF Permanent Network

EQ:

Earthquake

GNSS:

Global Navigation Satellite System

GS:

Geomagnetic storm

LB:

Lower bound

SC:

Solar cycle

SW:

Space weather

TEC:

Total electron content

TECU:

TEC units

UB:

Upper bound

VTEC:

Vertical total electron content

References

  • Afraimovich EL, Astafieva EI, Gokhberg MB, Lapshin VM, Permyakova VE, Steblov GM, Shalimov SL (2004) Variations of the total electron content in the ionosphere from GPS data recorded during the Hector Mine earthquake of October 16, 1999, California. Russ J Earth Sci 6(5):339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astafyeva E, Zakharenkova I, Forster M (2015) Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick’s day storm: a global multi-instrumental overview. J Geophys Res Space Phys 120:9023–9037. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA02629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Bartels J (1940) Geomagnetism, vol 1, chapter IX. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciraolo L, Azpilicueta F, Brunini C, Meza A, Radicella SM (2007) Calibration error on experimental slant total electron contents (TEC) determined with GPS. J Geod 81(2):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovolsky IR, Zubkov SI, Myachkin VI (1979) Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones. Pure Appl Geophys 117:1025–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez WD, Joselyn JA, Kamide Y, Kroehl HW, Rostoker G, Tsurutani BT, Vasyliunas VM (1994) What is a geomagnetic storm? J Geophys Res 99:5771–5792. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gousheva M, Danov D, Hristov P, Matova M (2008) Quasi-static electric fields phenomena in the ionosphere associated with pre- and post earthquake effects. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-101-2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulyaeva T, Arikan F (2016) Statistical discrimination of global post-seismic ionosphere effects under geomagnetic quiet and storm conditions. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 8:509–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1246483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horozovic D, Natras R, Mulic M (2018) Impact of geomagnetic storms and ionospheric disturbances on mid-latitude station’s coordinates using static and kinematic PPP; Poster: European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2018 (EGU 2018), Vienna; 2018-04-09 - 2018-04-13. In: EGU general assembly 2018, Geophysical research abstracts, vol 20 . ISSN: 1029-7006, p 9009

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen KS, Andalsvik YL (2016) Overview of the 2015 St. Partick’s day storm and its consequences for RTK and PPP positioning in Norway. J Space Weather Space Clim 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2016004

  • Liu JY, Chen YI, Chuo YJ, Chen CS (2006) A statistical investigation of preearthquake ionospheric anomaly. J Geophys Res 111:A05304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JY, Chen YI, Chen CH, Liu CY, Chen CY, Nishihashi M, Li JZ, Xia YQ, Oyama KI, Hattori K, Lin CH (2009) Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the 12 May 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake. J Geophys Res 114(A4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013698

  • Mulic M, Natras R (2018) Ionosphere TEC variations over Bosnia and Herzegovina using GNSS data. In: Cefalo R, Zieliński J, Barbarella M (eds) New advanced GNSS and 3D spatial techniques. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Cham, pp 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56218-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Natras R, Magnet N, Boisits J, Weber R (2018) GNSS-based regional ionosphere modeling over Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poster: European Geosciences Union, General Assembly 2018 (EGU 2018), Vienna; 09.04.2018 - 13.04.2018. In: EGU general assembly 2018, Geophysical research abstracts, vol 20 . ISSN: 1029-7006, p 661

    Google Scholar 

  • Nava B, Rodríguez-Zuluaga J, Alazo-Cuartas K, Kashcheyev A, Migoya-Orué Y, Radicella SM, Amory-Mazaudier C, Fleury R (2016) Middle- and low-latitude ionosphere response to 2015 St. Patrick’s day geomagnetic storm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 121:3421–3438. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulinets S, Boyarchuk K (2004) Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes. Springer, Berlin, p 315

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulinets S, Ouzounov D (2011) Lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling (LAIC) model: an unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. J Asian Earth Sci 41(4–5):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the Global Positioning System. PhD thesis, Bern University, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura M (1964) Hourly values of equatorial Dst for IGY. In: Annals of the international geophysical year, vol 35. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 945–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura M, Chapman S (1960) The average morphology of geomagnetic storm with sudden commencement. Abandl Akad Wiss Gottingen Math Phys K1(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • US National Space Weather Strategy, Product of National Science and Technology Council, Space weather operations, research and mitigation (SWORM) task force, USA, 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are sincerely grateful to International Association of Geodesy (IAG) for providing travel grant to the first author to deliver oral presentation at IAG-IASPEI Assembly 2017 in Kobe, Japan. Authors also thank International Center of Theoretical Physics Abdus Salam in Trieste and Dr. Luigi Ciraolo for the TEC calibration programme. Many thanks to institutions and organizations, which kindly provided their data: German Research Centre for Geosciences; NASA OmniWeb; World Data Center for Geomagnetism at Kyoto University Japan; EUREF Permanent Network; Geodetic Administration of Federation Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors are grateful to reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randa Natras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Natras, R., Mulic, M. (2018). Geodetic Remote Sensing of Ionosphere in Relation to Space Weather and Seismic Activity in B&H. In: Freymueller, J., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics