Abstract
In gravity field studies the complex structure of the Earth’s surface makes the solution of geodetic boundary value problems quite challenging. This equally concerns classical methods of potential theory as well as modern methods often based on a (variational or) weak solution concept. Aspects of this nature are reflected in the content of the paper. In case of a spherical Neumann problem the focus is on the classical Green’s function method and on the use of reproducing kernel and elementary potentials in generating function bases for Galerkin’s approximations. Similarly, the construction of Neumann’s function – Green’s function of the second kind and of entries in Galerkin’s matrix for basis functions generated by the reproducing kernel and by elementary potentials is also highlighted when solving Neumann’s problem in the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution. In this connection the role of elliptic integrals is pointed out. Finally, two concepts applied to the solution of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem are mentioned. They represent an approach based on variational methods and on the use of a transformation of coordinates offering an alternative between the boundary complexity and the complexity of the coefficients of the partial differential equation governing the solution. Successive approximations are involved in both the cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bjerhammar A, Svensson L (1983) On the geodetic boundary-value problem for a fixed boundary surface – satellite approach. Bull Geod 57:382–393
Garabedian PR (1964) Partial differential equations. Wiley, New York
Gilbarg D, Trudinger NS (1983) Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Springer, Berlin
Grafarend EW (1989) The geoid and the gravimetric boundary-value problem. Rep 18 Dept Geod, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm
Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco
Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. University Press, Cambridge
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, Wien
Holota P (1985) A new approach to iteration solutions in solving geodetic boundary value problems for real topography. In: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Geod. and Phys. of the Earth, GDR, Magdeburg, Sept. 23rd-29th, 1984, Part II. Veroff. d. Zentr. Inst. f. Phys. d. Erde, Nr. 81, Teil II, pp 4–15
Holota P (1986) Boundary value problems in physical geodesy: present state, boundary perturbation and the Green-Stokes representation. In: Proc. 1st Hotine-Marussi Symp. on Math. Geodesy, Rome, 3-5 June 1985, vol 2. Politecnico di Milano, pp 529–558
Holota P (1989) Laplacian versus topography in the solution of the Molodensky problem by means of successive approximations. In: Kejlso E, Poder K, Tscherning CC (eds) Festschrift to Torben Krarup. Geodaetisk Inst., Meddelelse No. 58, Kobenhavn, pp 213–227
Holota P (1992a) On the iteration solution of the geodetic boundary-value problem and some model refinements. Contribution to Geodetic Theory and Methodology. In: XXth General Assembly of the IUGG, IAG-Sect. IV, Vienna, 1991. Politecnico di Milano, 1991: pp 31-60; also in: Travaux de l’Association Internationale de Geodesie, Tome 29, Paris, pp 260–289
Holota P (1992b) Integral representation of the disturbing potential: effects involved, iteration technique and its convergence. In: Holota P, Vermeer M (eds) Proc. First continental workshop on the geoid in Europe, Prague, May 11-14, 1992. Research Inst. of Geod., Topog. and Cartog., Prague, in co-operation with IAG-Subcommis. for the Geoid in Europe, Prague, pp 402–419
Holota P (1997) Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem and geometrical interpretation. J Geod 71:640–651
Holota P (1999) Vartiational methods in geoid determination and function bases. Phys Chem Earth (A) 24(1):3–14
Holota P (2000) Direct method in physical geodesy. In: Schwarz KP (ed) Geodesy beyond 2000 – the challenges of the first decade. IAG General Assembly, Birmingham July 19-30, 1999. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 121. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–170
Holota P (2003) Green’s function and external masses in the solution of geodetic boundary-value problems. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid, 3rd Meeting of the Intl. Gravity and Geoid Commission, Thessaloniki, Greece, August 26-30, 2002. Ziti Editions, Thessaloniki, pp 108–113
Holota P (2004) Some topics related to the solution of boundary-value problems in geodesy. In: Sansò F (ed) V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Matera, Italy, June 17-21, 2002. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–200
Holota P (2011) Reproducing kernel and Galerkin’s matrix for the exterior of an ellipsoid: application in gravity field studies. Studia geophysica et geodaetica 55(3):397–413
Holota P (2016) Domain transformation and the iteration solution of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem. In: Freymueller J, Sánchez L (eds) International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations. Proceedings of the IAG General Assembly, Prague, Czech Republic, June 22-July 2, 2015. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 147. Springer, Cham, pp 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2016_236
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2012) Method of successive approximations in solving geodetic boundary value problems: analysis and numerical experiments. In: Sneeuw N, Novák P, Crespi M (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Rome, Italy, 6-10 June, 2009. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137. Springer, Cham, pp 189–198
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2014) Reproducing kernel and Neumann’s function for the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution: application in gravity field Studies. Studia geophysica et geodaetica 58(4):505–535
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2016) Small modifications of curvilinear coordinates and successive approximations applied in geopotential determination. In: 2016 AGU Fall Meeting, Session G21B (Scientific and Practical Challenges of Replacing NAD 83, NAVD 88, and IGLD 85), San Fransico, USA, 12-16 December 2016, poster. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm16/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/189936
Holota P, Nesvadba O (2017) Galerkin’s matrix for Neumann’s problem in the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution: approximation of the Earth’s gravity potential by buried masses. Studia geophysica et geodaetica (submitted)
Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. ESSA Monographs, Washington, D.C.
Klees R (1997) Topics on boundary elements methods. In: Sansò F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, pp 482–531
Koch KR, Pope AJ (1972) Uniqueness and existence for the geodetic boundary-value problem using the known surface of the Earth. Bull Geod 106:467–476
Kufner A, John O, Fučík S (1977) Function spaces. Academia, Prague
Nečas J (1967) Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques. Academia, Prague
Nesvadba O, Holota P, Klees R (2007) A direct method and its numerical interpretation in the determination of the Earth’s gravity field from terrestrial data. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet – monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools. IAG Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 22-26 August 2005. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–376
Neyman YM (1979) A variational method of physical geodesy. Nedra Publishers, Moscow. (in Russian)
Pick M, Pícha J, Vyskočil V (1973) Úvod ke studiu tíhového pole Země. Academia, Prague. 1973; also in English: Theory of the Earth’s gravity field. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973
Rektorys K (1974) Variační metody v inženýrských problémech a v problémech matematické fyziky. SNTL Publishers of Technical Literature, Prague. 1974; also in English: Variational methods. Reidel, Dordrecht 1977
Roach GF (1982) Green’s functions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sokolnikoff IS (1971) Tensor analysis. Theory and applications to geometry and mechanics of continua. Nauka Publishers, Moscow. (in Russian)
Tscherning CC (1975) Application of collocation. Determination of a local approximation to the anomalous potential of the Earth using “exact” astro-gravimetric collocation. In: Brosowski B, Martensen E (eds) Methoden und Verfahren der Mathematischen Physik, vol 14, pp 83–110
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation through Project No. 14-34595S and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through Project No. LO1506. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Sincere thanks go also to two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holota, P., Nesvadba, O. (2018). Boundary Complexity and Kernel Functions in Classical and Variational Concepts of Solving Geodetic Boundary Value Problems. In: Freymueller, J., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12914-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12915-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)