Skip to main content

Boundary Complexity and Kernel Functions in Classical and Variational Concepts of Solving Geodetic Boundary Value Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 149))

Abstract

In gravity field studies the complex structure of the Earth’s surface makes the solution of geodetic boundary value problems quite challenging. This equally concerns classical methods of potential theory as well as modern methods often based on a (variational or) weak solution concept. Aspects of this nature are reflected in the content of the paper. In case of a spherical Neumann problem the focus is on the classical Green’s function method and on the use of reproducing kernel and elementary potentials in generating function bases for Galerkin’s approximations. Similarly, the construction of Neumann’s function – Green’s function of the second kind and of entries in Galerkin’s matrix for basis functions generated by the reproducing kernel and by elementary potentials is also highlighted when solving Neumann’s problem in the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution. In this connection the role of elliptic integrals is pointed out. Finally, two concepts applied to the solution of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem are mentioned. They represent an approach based on variational methods and on the use of a transformation of coordinates offering an alternative between the boundary complexity and the complexity of the coefficients of the partial differential equation governing the solution. Successive approximations are involved in both the cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bjerhammar A, Svensson L (1983) On the geodetic boundary-value problem for a fixed boundary surface – satellite approach. Bull Geod 57:382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garabedian PR (1964) Partial differential equations. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbarg D, Trudinger NS (1983) Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend EW (1989) The geoid and the gravimetric boundary-value problem. Rep 18 Dept Geod, The Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen WA, Moritz H (1967) Physical geodesy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1985) A new approach to iteration solutions in solving geodetic boundary value problems for real topography. In: Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Geod. and Phys. of the Earth, GDR, Magdeburg, Sept. 23rd-29th, 1984, Part II. Veroff. d. Zentr. Inst. f. Phys. d. Erde, Nr. 81, Teil II, pp 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1986) Boundary value problems in physical geodesy: present state, boundary perturbation and the Green-Stokes representation. In: Proc. 1st Hotine-Marussi Symp. on Math. Geodesy, Rome, 3-5 June 1985, vol 2. Politecnico di Milano, pp 529–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1989) Laplacian versus topography in the solution of the Molodensky problem by means of successive approximations. In: Kejlso E, Poder K, Tscherning CC (eds) Festschrift to Torben Krarup. Geodaetisk Inst., Meddelelse No. 58, Kobenhavn, pp 213–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1992a) On the iteration solution of the geodetic boundary-value problem and some model refinements. Contribution to Geodetic Theory and Methodology. In: XXth General Assembly of the IUGG, IAG-Sect. IV, Vienna, 1991. Politecnico di Milano, 1991: pp 31-60; also in: Travaux de l’Association Internationale de Geodesie, Tome 29, Paris, pp 260–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1992b) Integral representation of the disturbing potential: effects involved, iteration technique and its convergence. In: Holota P, Vermeer M (eds) Proc. First continental workshop on the geoid in Europe, Prague, May 11-14, 1992. Research Inst. of Geod., Topog. and Cartog., Prague, in co-operation with IAG-Subcommis. for the Geoid in Europe, Prague, pp 402–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1997) Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem and geometrical interpretation. J Geod 71:640–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1999) Vartiational methods in geoid determination and function bases. Phys Chem Earth (A) 24(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2000) Direct method in physical geodesy. In: Schwarz KP (ed) Geodesy beyond 2000 – the challenges of the first decade. IAG General Assembly, Birmingham July 19-30, 1999. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 121. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2003) Green’s function and external masses in the solution of geodetic boundary-value problems. In: Tziavos IN (ed) Gravity and Geoid, 3rd Meeting of the Intl. Gravity and Geoid Commission, Thessaloniki, Greece, August 26-30, 2002. Ziti Editions, Thessaloniki, pp 108–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2004) Some topics related to the solution of boundary-value problems in geodesy. In: Sansò F (ed) V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Matera, Italy, June 17-21, 2002. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2011) Reproducing kernel and Galerkin’s matrix for the exterior of an ellipsoid: application in gravity field studies. Studia geophysica et geodaetica 55(3):397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2016) Domain transformation and the iteration solution of the linear gravimetric boundary value problem. In: Freymueller J, Sánchez L (eds) International Symposium on Earth and Environmental Sciences for Future Generations. Proceedings of the IAG General Assembly, Prague, Czech Republic, June 22-July 2, 2015. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 147. Springer, Cham, pp 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2016_236

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P, Nesvadba O (2012) Method of successive approximations in solving geodetic boundary value problems: analysis and numerical experiments. In: Sneeuw N, Novák P, Crespi M (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Rome, Italy, 6-10 June, 2009. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137. Springer, Cham, pp 189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P, Nesvadba O (2014) Reproducing kernel and Neumann’s function for the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution: application in gravity field Studies. Studia geophysica et geodaetica 58(4):505–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P, Nesvadba O (2016) Small modifications of curvilinear coordinates and successive approximations applied in geopotential determination. In: 2016 AGU Fall Meeting, Session G21B (Scientific and Practical Challenges of Replacing NAD 83, NAVD 88, and IGLD 85), San Fransico, USA, 12-16 December 2016, poster. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm16/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/189936

  • Holota P, Nesvadba O (2017) Galerkin’s matrix for Neumann’s problem in the exterior of an oblate ellipsoid of revolution: approximation of the Earth’s gravity potential by buried masses. Studia geophysica et geodaetica (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotine M (1969) Mathematical geodesy. ESSA Monographs, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klees R (1997) Topics on boundary elements methods. In: Sansò F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, pp 482–531

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR, Pope AJ (1972) Uniqueness and existence for the geodetic boundary-value problem using the known surface of the Earth. Bull Geod 106:467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kufner A, John O, Fučík S (1977) Function spaces. Academia, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Nečas J (1967) Les méthodes directes en théorie des équations elliptiques. Academia, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesvadba O, Holota P, Klees R (2007) A direct method and its numerical interpretation in the determination of the Earth’s gravity field from terrestrial data. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C (eds) Dynamic planet – monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools. IAG Symposium, Cairns, Australia, 22-26 August 2005. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 370–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman YM (1979) A variational method of physical geodesy. Nedra Publishers, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick M, Pícha J, Vyskočil V (1973) Úvod ke studiu tíhového pole Země. Academia, Prague. 1973; also in English: Theory of the Earth’s gravity field. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Rektorys K (1974) Variační metody v inženýrských problémech a v problémech matematické fyziky. SNTL Publishers of Technical Literature, Prague. 1974; also in English: Variational methods. Reidel, Dordrecht 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach GF (1982) Green’s functions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolnikoff IS (1971) Tensor analysis. Theory and applications to geometry and mechanics of continua. Nauka Publishers, Moscow. (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (1975) Application of collocation. Determination of a local approximation to the anomalous potential of the Earth using “exact” astro-gravimetric collocation. In: Brosowski B, Martensen E (eds) Methoden und Verfahren der Mathematischen Physik, vol 14, pp 83–110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation through Project No. 14-34595S and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through Project No. LO1506. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Sincere thanks go also to two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Holota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Holota, P., Nesvadba, O. (2018). Boundary Complexity and Kernel Functions in Classical and Variational Concepts of Solving Geodetic Boundary Value Problems. In: Freymueller, J., Sánchez, L. (eds) International Symposium on Advancing Geodesy in a Changing World. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2018_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics