Advertisement

Impact of Limited Satellite Visibility on Estimates of Vertical Land Movements

  • K. E. Abraha
  • F. N. Teferle
  • A. Hunegnaw
  • R. Dach
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 147)

Abstract

The number of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) satellites and their geometry directly affect the quality of positioning and derived satellite products. Accordingly, the International GNSS Service (IGS) recommends GNSS antennas to be installed away from natural and man-made surfaces and structures, which may affect the incoming signals through severe multipath or obstructions. Following these recommendations, continuous GNSS (cGNSS) stations are generally located in low multipath environments with minimal signal obstructions. However, some applications require GNSS antennas to be installed at specific locations in order to measure local processes. In support of sea level studies, cGNSS stations are established at or close to tide gauges in order to accurately monitor the local vertical land movements experienced by the sea level sensors. However, the environment at the tide gauge might not be optimal for GNSS observations due to the aforementioned station-specific effects, which may degrade the quality of coordinate solutions. This study investigates the impact of severe signal obstructions on long-term position time series for some selected stations. A masking profile from an actually obstructed site is extracted, simulated and applied to unobstructed IGS sites. To investigate these effects, we implemented a new feature called azimuth-dependent elevation masking in the Bernese GNSS Software version 5.2. We present our preliminary results on the use of this new feature to study the impact of different obstruction scenarios on long-term GNSS position time series and vertical land movement estimates. The results show that a certain obstruction, with the effect being highly dependent on its severity and azimuthal direction, affects all coordinate components with the effect being more significant for the Up component. Moreover, it causes changes in the rate estimates and increases the rate uncertainty with the effect being site-specific.

Keywords

Azimuth-dependent masking Global navigation satellite systems Vertical land movements 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg (contract number 6835562). The computational resources used in this study were provided by the High Performance Computing Facility at the University of Luxembourg. We also acknowledge the IGS, TIGA and UNAVCO/PBO for data and products.

References

  1. Chen HC, Huang YS, Chiang KW, Yang M, Rau RJ (2009) The performance comparison between GPS and BeiDou-2/COMPASS: a perspective from Asia. J Chin Inst Eng 32:679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dach R, Lutz S, Walser P, Pierre F (eds) (2015) Bernese GNSS software version 5.2. User manual, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern Open Publishing. doi:10.7892/boris.72297; ISBN: 978-3-906813-05-9Google Scholar
  3. Dach R, Schaer S, Arnold D, Orliac E, Prange L, Susnik A, Villiger A, Jäggi A (2016) CODE final product series for the IGS. Published by Astronomical Institute, University of Bern. http://www.aiub.unibe.ch/download/CODE; doi:10.7892/boris.75876Google Scholar
  4. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83(3–4):191–198. doi:10.1007/s00190-008-0300-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ge M (2005) Impact of GPS satellite antenna offsets on scale changes in global network solution. Geophys Res Lett 32(6). doi:10.1029/2004gl022224Google Scholar
  6. Gili JA, Corominas J, Rius J (2000) Using global positioning system techniques in landslide monitoring. Eng Geol 55(3):167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goebell S, King MA (2011) Effects of azimuthal multipath asymmetry on long GPS coordinate time series. GPS Solutions 15:287–297. doi:10.1007/s10291-011-0227-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Griffiths J, Ray JR (2012) Sub-daily alias and draconitic errors in the IGS orbits. GPS Solutions 17(3):413–422. doi:10.1007/s10291-012-0289-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han JY, Wu Y, Liu RY (2012) Determining the optimal site location of GNSS base stations. Bol Ciênc Geod, sec Artigos, Curitiba, 18(1):154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji S, Chen W, Ding X, Chen Y, Zhao C, Hu C (2010) Potential benefits of GPS/GLONASS/Galileo integration in an urban canyon – Hong Kong. J Navig 63:681–693. doi:10.1017/s0373463310000081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King MA, Watson CS (2010) Long GPS coordinate time series: multipath and geometry effects. J Geophys Res. 115:B04403. doi:10.1029/2009JB006543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Penna NT, King MA, Stewart MP (2007) GPS height time series: short-period origins of spurious long-period signals. J Geophys Res 112:B02402. doi:10.1029/2005JB004047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodriguez-Solano CJ, Hugentobler U, Steigenberger P, Bloßfeld M, Fritsche M (2014) Reducing the draconitic errors in GNSS geodetic products. J Geod 88(6):559–574. doi: 10.1007/s00190-014-0704-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Santamaría-Gómez A, Bouin MN, Collilieux X, Wöppelmann G (2011) Correlated Errors in GPS Position Time Series: Implications for velocity estimates. J Geophys Res 116(B1). doi:10.1029/2010jb007701Google Scholar
  15. Santerre R (1991) Impact of GPS satellite sky distribution. Manuscr Geodaet 16:28–53Google Scholar
  16. Schöne T, Schön N, Thaller D (2009) IGS Tide Gauge Benchmark Monitoring Pilot Project (TIGA): scientific benefits. J Geod 83:249–261. doi:10.1007/ s00190-008-0269-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Teferle FN, Bingley R, Dodson A, Apostolidis P, Staton G (2003) RF interference and multipath effects at continuous GPS installations for long-term monitoring of tide gauges in UK harbours. In: Proceedings of 16th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation ION GPS-GNSS 2003, Portland, Oregon, September 9–12, 2003, Institute of Navigation: 2082–2092Google Scholar
  18. Wang G, Bao Y, Cuddus Y, Jia X, Serna J, Jing Q (2015) A methodology to derive precise landslide displacement time series from continuous GPS observations in tectonically active and cold regions: a case study in Alaska. Nat Hazards 77:1939–1961. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1684-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woodworth PL, Teferle FN, Bingley RM, Shennan I, Williams SDP (2009) Trends in UK mean sea level revisited. Geophys J Int 176(22):19–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03942.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zumberge J, Heflin M, Jefferson D, Watkins M, Webb F (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. Abraha
    • 1
  • F. N. Teferle
    • 1
  • A. Hunegnaw
    • 1
  • R. Dach
    • 2
  1. 1.Geophysics LaboratoryUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.Astronomical InstituteUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations