Abstract
The vertical reference frames for Argentina and Brazil present discrepancies due to their different datums and realizations. Thus, since 2008, we have started a series of activities with the aim of unifying the Argentine and Brazilian national vertical networks (NVNs). To achieve this goal, we have connected the two NVNs at three border points by using the geodetic levelling approach. Additionally, the gravity field approach was also applied, based on a suitable representation of the geoid by considering the Earth Gravitational Model (EGM2008) in its full resolution. In this regard, 1266 co-located Global Positioning System (GPS) and levelling benchmarks regularly distributed over Argentina (612) and Brazil (654) were considered. The geodetic levelling approach shows an offset value of 54 cm, which implies that the Argentine vertical reference frame is above that of the Brazilian vertical reference frame. However, the result of the gravimetric approach shows an offset of 57 cm, which implies a difference of approximately 3 cm between both methods. Hence, since Brazil and Argentina represent a significant part of South America, the solution to the datum problem between both countries could point towards a common vertical reference frame for the Atlantic side.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ekman M (1989) Impacts of geodynamic phenomena on systems for height and gravity. Bull Géod 63(3):281–296. Doi: 10.1007/BF02520477
Ferreira VG, de Freitas SRC (2011) Geopotential numbers from GPS satellite surveying and disturbing potential model: a case study of Parana, Brazil. J Appl Geod 5(3–4):155–162. Doi: 10.1515/JAG.2011.016
Filmer MS, Featherstone WE, Kuhn M (2010) The effect of EGM2008-based normal, normal-orthometric and Helmert orthometric height systems on the Australian levelling network. J Geod 84(8):501–513. Doi: 10.1007/s00190-010-0388-0
Fortes LPS (1998) An overview of the SIRGAS project. In: Advances in Positioning and Reference Frames, IAG Symposia, vol 118, pp 167–167. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03714-0_26
Heck B, Rummel R (1990) Strategies for solving the vertical datum problem using terrestrial and satellite geodetic data. In: Sea Surface Topography and the Geoid, IAG Symposia, vol 104, pp 116–128. Doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7098-7_14
Hernández JN, Blitzkow D, Luz R, Sánchez L, Sandoval P, Drewes H (2002) Connection of the vertical control networks of Venezuela, Brazil and Colombia. In: Vertical Reference Systems, IAG Symposia, vol 124, pp 324–327. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04683-8_60
Ihde J, Sánchez L (2005) A unified global height reference system as a basis for IGGOS. J Geod 40(4–5):400–413. Doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2005.06.015
Kotsakis C, Katsambalos K, Ampatzidis D (2012) Estimation of the zero-height geopotential level \(W_{o}^{\text{LVD}}\) in a local vertical datum from inversion of co-located GPS, leveling and geoid heights: a case study in the Hellenic islands. J Geod 86(6):423–439. Doi: 10.1007/s00190-011-0530-7
Montecino HD, de Freitas SRC (2014) Strategies for connecting Imbituba and Santana Brazilian datums based on satellite gravimetry and residual terrain model. In: Earth on the Edge: Sci Sustain Planet, IAG Symposia, vol 139, pp 543–549. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37222-3_72
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117:B04406. Doi: 10.1029/2011JB008916
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2013) Correction to the development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res 118(5):2633–2633. Doi: 10.1002/jgrb.50167
Poutanen M, Vermeer M, Mäkinen J (1996) The permanent tide in GPS positioning. J Geod 70(8):499–504. Doi: 10.1007/s001900050038
Rülke A, Liebsch G, Sacher M, Schäfer U, Schirme U, Ihde J (2012) Unification of European height system realizations. J Geod Sci 2(4):343–354. Doi: 10.2478/v10156-011-0048-1
Sánchez L (2007) Definition and realization of the SIRGAS vertical reference system within a globally unified height system. IAG Symposia 130:638–645. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-49350-1_9
Yi W, Rummel R (2014) A comparison of GOCE gravitational models with EGM2008. J Geod 73:14–22. Doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2013.10.004
Acknowledgements
The authors thank CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) and CONICET (Argentine National Council for Scientific and Technical Research) for their financial support. We also thank the IBGE and IGN for providing the GPS-levelling data over Brazil and Argentina, respectively. We are grateful to the Associate Editor and the three reviewers for their remarks, which improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gomez, M.E. et al. (2015). Analysis of the Discrepancies Between the Vertical Reference Frames of Argentina and Brazil. In: Rizos, C., Willis, P. (eds) IAG 150 Years. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_75
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_75
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24603-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30895-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)