Skip to main content

On an Iterative Approach to Solving the Nonlinear Satellite-Fixed Geodetic Boundary-Value Problem

  • Conference paper
VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 142))

Abstract

The paper deals with an iterative treatment of solving the nonlinear satellite-fixed geodetic boundary-value problem (NSFGBVP). To that goal we formulate the NSFGBVP consisting of the Laplace equation in 3D bounded domain outside the Earth. The computational domain is bounded by the approximation of the Earth’s surface where the nonlinear boundary condition (BC) with prescribed magnitude of the gravity vector is given and by a spherical boundary placed approximately at the altitude of chosen satellite mission on which the Dirichlet BC for disturbing potential obtained from the satellite only geopotential model is applied. In case of local gravity field modelling, we add another four side boundaries where the Dirichlet BC is prescribed as well. The concept of our iterative approach is based on determining the direction of actual gravity vector together with the value of the disturbing potential. Such an iterative approach leads to the first iteration where the classical fixed gravimetric boundary-value problem with the oblique derivative BC is solved and the last iteration represents the approximation of the actual disturbing potential and the direction of gravity vector. As a numerical method for our approach, the finite volume method has been implemented. The practical numerical experiments deal with the local and global gravity field modelling. In case of local gravity field modelling, namely in the domain above Slovakia, the disturbing potential as a direct numerical result is transformed to the quasigeoidal heights and tested by the GPS-levelling. Results show an improvement in the standard deviation for subsequent iterations in solving NSFGBVP as well as the convergence to EGM2008. The differences between the last and the first iteration, which represent the numerically obtained linearization error, reach up to 10 cm. In case of global gravity field modelling, our solution is compared with the disturbing potential generated from EGM2008. The obtained numerical results show that the error of the linearization can exceed several centimeters, mainly in high mountainous areas (e.g. in Himalaya region they reach 20 cm) as well as in areas along the ocean trenches (varying from − 2. 5 to 2. 5 cm).

This work was supported by grant APVV-0072-11 and VEGA 1/1063/11.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen OB (2010) The DTU10 Gravity field and mean sea surface. In: Second international symposium of the gravity field of the Earth (IGFS2), Fairbanks, Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  • Backus GE (1968) Application of a non-linear boundary-value problem for Laplace’s equation to gravity and geomegnetic intensity surveys. Q J Mech Appl Math 2:195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker JJ et al (2009) Global bathymetry and elevation data at 30 arc seconds resolution: SRTM30 PLUS. Mar Geod 4:355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerhammar A, Svensson L (1983) On the geodetic boundary value problem for a fixed boundary surface – a satellite approach. Bull Geod 57(1–4):382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čunderlík R, Mikula K, Mojzeš M (2008) Numerical solution of the linearized fixed gravimetric boundary-value problem. J Geod 82(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz G, Díaz JI, Otero J (2006) On an oblique boundary value problem related to the Backus problem in geodesy. Nonlinear Anal Real World Appl 7:147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz G, Díaz JI, Otero J (2011) Construction of the maximal solution of Backus’ problem in geodesy and geomagnetism. Stud Geophys Geod 55(3):415–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eymard R, Gallouet T, Herbin R (2001) Finite volume approximation of elliptic problems and convergence of an approximate gradient. Appl Num Math 37(1–2):31–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fašková Z, Čunderlík R, Mikula K (2010) Finite element method for solving geodetic boundary value problems. J Geod 84:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E, Niemeier W (1971) The free nonlinear boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Bull Geod 101:243–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend E (1989) The geoid and the gravimetric boundary value problem, Report No 18. The Royal Institute of Technology (Dep of Geod), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand T, Šefara J, Pašteka R, Bielik M, Daniel S (2001) Atlas of geophysical maps and profiles. State geological institute, Bratislava, MS Geofond (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck B (1989) On the non-linear geodetic boundary value problem for a fixed boundary surface. Bull Geod 63(1):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. Springer, Wien NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (1997) Coerciveness of the linear gravimetric boundary-value problem and a geometrical interpretation. J Geod 71(10):640–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holota P (2005) Neumann’s boundary-value problem in studies on earth gravity field: weak solution. 50 years of Research Institute of Geodesy, Topography and Cartography, Prague, pp 34, 49–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR, Pope AJ (1972) Uniqueness and existence for the godetic boundary value problem using the known surface of the earth. Bull Geod 46:467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macák M, Mikula K, Minarechová Z (2012) Solving the oblique derivative boundary-value problem by the finite volume method. In: ALGORITMY 2012, 19th conference on scientific computing, pp 75–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Gürr T et al (2012) The new combined satellite only model GOCO03s. Presented at the GGHS-2012 in Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res 117:B04406. Doi:10.1029/2011JB008916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdote F, Sansó F (1989) On the analysis of the fixed-boundary gravimetric boundary-value problem. In: Sacerdote F. Sansó F (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy, Pisa, Politecnico di Milano, pp 507–516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Macák .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Macák, M., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Čunderlík, R. (2015). On an Iterative Approach to Solving the Nonlinear Satellite-Fixed Geodetic Boundary-Value Problem. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 142. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics