Skip to main content

Developments in the Implementation and Use of Least-Squares Collocation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
IAG 150 Years

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 143))

  • 2530 Accesses

Abstract

The method of Least-Squares Collocation (LSC) was developed in the 1960s based on theoretical advances by T. Krarup and H. Moritz. The method may be used for the determination of approximations to the anomalous gravity potential (T) and associated parameters like biases or tilts. All gravity field observabels which may be related to T through a linear functional may be predicted and error-estimates computed. The method has primarily been used in local or regional applications, due to the fact that a system of equations with as many unknowns as the number of observations need to be established and solved. The problem has been solved due to the use of multiprocessing in the current GRAVSOFT implementation of GEOCOL.

The method has been implemented using isotropic reproducing kernels fitted to empirical covariance functions. The Kernels are harmonic outside a so-called Bjerhammar-sphere, which must be inside the volume bounded by the location of the used data. This problem has been overcome by initially lifting the data in Polar areas 20 km, thereby enabling global LSC solutions in the form of spherical harmonic expansions.

The theoretical possibility of computing error-estimates does not give good results due to the isotropy of the kernels used. The error estimates primarily shows where good data are located or where data are missing. However due to the advent of global gravity gradients from the ESA Gravity and Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) mission it is possible to compute nearly everywhere local signal variances which can be used to tune the otherwise uniform estimates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen OB, Knudsen P, Tscherning CC (1996) Investigation of methods for global gravity field recovery from dense ERS-1 geodetic mission altimetry. In: Rapp RH, Cazenave AA, Nerem RS (eds) Global gravity field and its temporal variations. IAG Symposia, vol 116. Springer, pp 218–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabelos D, Reguzzoni M, Tscherning CC (2013) Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity gradients at 10 km altitude fromGOCE gradient data 2009–2011 and polar gravity. Newtons Bull. http://www.isgeoid.polimi.it/Newton/Online_First/Newton_cct2208.pdf

  • Bouman J, Koop R, Tscherning CC, Visser P (2004) Calibration of GOCE SGG data using high-low SST, terrestrial gravity data, and global gravity field models. J Geod 78:1–2. doi:10.1007/s00190-004-383-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R (1984) Local covariance functions and density distributions. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying No. 356, The Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (1981) The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. J Geophys Res 86(B9):7843–7854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (2008) An overview manual for the GRAVSOFT geodetic gravity field modelling programs, 2nd edn. Contract report for JUPEM

    Google Scholar 

  • Herceg M, Knudsen P, Tscherning CC (2012) GOCE data for local geoid enhancement. Accepted proceedings international symposium on gravity, geoid and height systems 2012, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • HPF (2010) GOCE level 2 product data handbook, GO-MA-HPF-GS-0110, Issue 4.3, 9 Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas E, Sørensen B, Tscherning CC, Veichert M (2013) Multi-processing least squares collocation applications to gravity field analysis. J Geod Sci 3(3):219–223. doi:10.2478/jogs-2013-0025

  • Knudsen P (1987) Estimation and modelling of the local empirical covariance function using gravity and satellite altimeter data. Bull Geod 61:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krarup T (1969) A contribution to the mathematical foundation of physical geodesy. Meddelelse no. 44, Geodætisk Institut, København

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Guerr T, Kurtenbach E, Eicker A (2010) The satellite-only gravity field model ITG-grace2010s. http://www.igg.uni-bonn.de/apmg/index.php?id=itg-grace2010

  • Migliaccio F, Reguzzoni M, Sansò F, Tscherning CC (2005) The performance of the space-wise approach to GOCE data analysis, whenstatistical homogenization is applied. Newton Bull 2. http://www.isgeoid.polimi.it/Newton/Newton_2/Migliaccio.pdf

  • Moritz H (1965) Schwerevorhesage und Ausgelichungsrechnung. Z Vermessungswesen 90:181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. H. Wichmann, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Pail R, Bruinsma S, Migliaccio F, Förste C, Goiginger H, Schuh W-D, Höck E, Reguzzoni M, Brockmann JM, Abrikosov O, Veicherts M, Fecher T, Mayrhofer R, Krasbutter I, Sansò F, Tscherning CC (2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. J Geod 85:819–843. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0467-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012) The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 117:B04406. doi: 10.1029/2011JB008916

    Google Scholar 

  • Pertusini L, Reguzzoni M, Sansò F, Sona G (2007) Ellipsoidal collocation. Presented XXIV IUGG General Assembly, Perugia

    Google Scholar 

  • Reguzzoni M, Gatti A (2013) Anisotropic covariance modelling based on locally adapted coefficient variances in gravity field estimation. Submitted proceedings HM2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq M, Tscherning CC, Zulfiqar A (2010) Regional gravity field model in Pakistan area from the combination of CHAMP, GRACE and ground data using least squares collocation: A case study. J Adv Space Res 46(11):1466–1476. doi:10.1016/jasr.2010.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansò F, Sideris MG (eds) (2013) Geoid determination, vol 110, Lecture notes in earth system science. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74700-0_7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansò F, Tscherning CC (1980) Notes on convergence problems in Col-location theory. Bull Geod Sci Affi XXXIX(2):221–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansò F, Venuti G (2012) The convergence problem of collocation solutions in the framework of the stochastic. VII Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy, vol 137. Proceedings of the symposium in Rome, 6–10 June, 2009. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (1972) An Algol-program for prediction of height anomalies, gravity anomalies and deflections of the vertical. The Danish Geodetic Institute Internal Rep. No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (1972) Representation of covariance functions related tothe anomalous potential of the earth using reproducing kernels. The Danish Geodetic Institute Internal Rep. No. 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (1974) A FORTRAN IV program for the determination of the anomalous potential using stepwise least squares collocation. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science No. 212, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (1978) On the convergence of least squares collocation. Bull Geod Sci Affi XXXIII(2–3):507–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (2001) Computation of spherical harmonic coefficients and their error estimates using least squares collocation. J Geod 75:14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC (2013) Improvement of least-squares collocation error x estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard deviations. Submitted proceedings HM2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscherning CC, Rapp RH (1974) Closed covariance expressions for gravity anomalies, geoid undulations, and deflections of the vertical implied by anomaly degree-variance models. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science No. 208, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz H, Forsberg R, Aagren J, Tscherning CC, Sjoeberg LE (2012) Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area. J Geod Sci 2(1):1–12. doi:10.2478/v10156-011-0024-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to those who have contributed to the development: D. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoni, F. Sansò, M. Sideris, K.P. Schwarz, R. Rummel, R. Barzaghi, R.H. Rapp, P. Holota, H. Sünkel, P. Knudsen, R. Forsberg, M. Veicherts, B. Sørensen, G. Moreaux, S. Heitz, E. Grafarend.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. C. Tscherning .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tscherning, C.C. (2015). Developments in the Implementation and Use of Least-Squares Collocation. In: Rizos, C., Willis, P. (eds) IAG 150 Years. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 143. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics