Abstract
DTU-Space has since 1996 carried out large area airborne surveys over both polar, tropical and temperate regions, especially for geoid determination and global geopotential models. Recently we have started flying two gravimeters (LCR and Chekan-AM) side by side for increased reliability and redundancy. Typical gravity results are at the 2 mGal rms level, translating into 5–10 cm accuracy in geoid. However, in rough mountainous areas results can be more noisy, mainly due to long-period mountain waves and turbulence. In the paper we outline results of surveys and recent geoid determinations in Antarctica and Tanzania based on DTU-Space aerogravity and GOCE. In both cases the airborne data validate GOCE to very high degrees, and confirms the synergy of airborne gravity and GOCE. For Antarctica, the deep interior Antarctic survey (continued in 2013 from a remote field camp), shows that it is possible efficiently to cover even the most remote regions on the planet with good aerogravity. With the recent termination of the GOCE mission, it is therefore timely to initiate a coordinated, preferably international, airborne gravity effort to cover the polar gap south of 83° S; such a survey can in principle logistically be done in a single season.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bell RE, Coakley BJ, Blankenship DD, Hodge SM, Brozena JM, Jarvis J (1992) Airborne gravity from a light aircraft: CASERTZ 1990–91. In: Yoshida Y (ed) Recent progress in antarctic earth science. Terrapub, Tokyo, pp 571–577
Brozena JM (1992) The greenland aerogeophysics project: airborne gravity, topographic and magnetic mapping of an entire continent. In: Colombo O (ed) From mars to greenland, proc. IAG symposia, vol 110. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 203–214
Elieff S, Ferguson S (2008) Establishing the “air truth” from 10 years of airborne gravimeter data. First Break, 26, November 2008
Forsberg R, Brozena J (1996) Airborne geoid measurements in the Arctic ocean. In: Proceedings international symposium on gravity, Geoid and marine geodesy, Tokyo, Sept. 1996. IAG series, vol 117. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 139–147
Forsberg R, Olesen AV (2010) Airborne gravity field determination. In: Xu G (ed) Sciences of geodesy – I, Advances and future directions. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 83–104. ISBN 978-3-642-11741-1
Forsberg R, Hehl K, Bastos L, Giskehaug A, Meyer U (1996) Development of an airborne geoid mapping system for coastal oceanograoh (AGMASCO). In: Proceedings international symposium on gravity, Geoid and marine geodesy, Tokyo, Sept. 1996. IAG series, vol 117. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 163–170.
Forsberg, R, Olesen A, Munkhtsetseg D, Amarzaya A (2007): Downward continuation and geoid determination in Mongolia from airborne and surface gravimetry and SRTM topography. Proceedings of the 1st Symposium of the International Gravity Field Service, Harita Dergisi, 73(18), 259--264, Ankara.
Forsberg R, Olesen AV, Einarsson I, Manandhar N, Shreshta K (2011) Geoid of Nepal from airborne gravity survey. Proceedings IAG Symposia, vol 139. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Melbourne, pp 521–528
Forsberg R, Olesen A, Alshasi A, Gidskehaug A, Ses S, Kadir M, Majid K, Benny P (2012) Airborne gravimetry survey for the marine area of the United Arab Emirates. Marine Geodesy 35(3):221–232. doi:10.1080/01490419.2012.672874
Klingele E, Halliday M, Cocard M, Kahle H-G (1995) Airborne gravimetric survey of Switzerland. Vermessung Photogrammetrie Kulturtechnik 4:248–253
Krasnov AA, Nesenyuk LP, Peshekhonov VG, Sokolov AV, Elinson LS (2011) Integrated marine gravimetric system. Development and operation results. Gyrosc Navig 2(2):75–81
Olesen AV (2002) Improved airborne scalar gravimetry for regional gravity field mapping and geoid determination. Ph.d. dissertation, National Survey and Cadastre of Denmark Technical Report 24, p 123
Olesen AV, Forsberg R, Keller K, Gidskehaug A (2000) Airborne gravity survey of the Lincoln Sea and Wandel Sea, North Greenland. Phys Chem Earth A 25(1):25–29
Pail R, Bruinsma S, Migliaccio F, Foerste C, Goiginger H, Schuh W-D, Hoeck E, Reguzzoni M, Brockmann JM, Abrikosov O, Veicherts M, Fecher T, Mayrhofer R, Krasbutter I, Sanso F, Tscherning CC (2011) First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches. J Geod 85(11):819–843
Schwarz K-P, Sideris MG, Forsberg R (1990) Use of FFT methods in physical geodesy. Geophys J Int 100:485–514
Valliant HD (1991) The LaCoste and Romberg air/sea gravity meter: an overview. Geophysical exploration at sea, 2nd edn, vol 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 141–176
Williams S, MacQueen JD (2001) Development of a versatile, commercially proven, and cost-effective airborne gravity system. Leading Edge 60:651–654
Acknowledgements
The survey costs for Antarctica were sponsored by NGA, ESA and DTU Space, and for Tanzania by the Department of Survey, Tanzania, the World Bank and NGA. The Antarctica operations where carried out in cooperation with British Antarctic Survey, the Norwegian Polar Institute, and the University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Forsberg, R., Olesen, A.V., Nielsen, E., Einarsson, I. (2015). Airborne Gravimetry for Geoid and GOCE. In: Jin, S., Barzaghi, R. (eds) IGFS 2014. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_47
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39819-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39820-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)