Advertisement

pp 1-12 | Cite as

Candy and Poisons: Fouling Management with Pharmacophore Coatings

  • Daniel Rittschof
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Polymer Science book series

Abstract

This chapter provides a context and perspective to consider novel materials for use in fouling management. Fouling and biofouling are defined and the rationale for existing fouling management is provided. Fouling management in even benign environments is difficult because commercial approaches use broad-spectrum stable biocides with non-target effects on humans, environmental health, and food safety. These historic approaches target death as the only biological endpoint. If novel approaches are to be implemented, biological alternatives to broad-spectrum long-lived biocides must be discovered, designed, and fitted within existing business models, infrastructures, and regulatory frameworks. The title, “Candy and Poisons”, highlights the two major issues for sustainable fouling management. Potent, short-lived toxins and pharmacophores, protected in coatings and chemically and biologically destroyed, are eaten as is candy within hours to days after release. Fouling on roofs as an example of an extreme environment and speculation about the use of conserved biological pathways in fouling management are discussed. Major concerns for all fouling management approaches are humans, environmental health, and food safety. With novel approaches, health and food safety should be addressed at the beginning of the technology development. The most difficult hurdle that a new technology faces is the regulatory framework. Present regulatory structures repress new technology and are slowly reducing options for the highly toxic management approaches. Policy changes that support novel technologies and close loopholes for long-lived toxins are needed to stimulate environmentally appropriate solutions.

Keywords

Biofouling Conserved pathways Extreme environments Fouling management Novel materials 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was partially supported by the grants from the US Office of Naval Research. Although the ideas are mine, I would not have had them without the many collaborators who shaped my thinking through our working relationships and the enjoyment of attempting to figure out how the world works. Thanks to the editors and reviewers, who greatly improved this chapter. Finally, thank you to J. Miller who solved my reference issues and did so much more.

References

  1. 1.
    Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds) (1984) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, AnnapolisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hellio C, Yebra DM, Sitton R (eds) (2010) Advances in antifouling coatings and technologies. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dürr S, Thomason J (eds) (2010) Biofouling. Wiley-Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clare AS, Rittschof D, Gerhart DJ, Maki JS (1992) Molecular approaches to non-toxic antifouling. Invertebr Reprod Dev 22(1–3):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke RD (1984) Pheromonal control of metamorphosis in the pacific sand dollar, Dendraster Eccentricus. Science 225:442–443ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burke RD (1986) Pheromones and the gregarious settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. Bull Mar Sci 39:323–332ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rittschof D, Cohen J (2004) Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 25(9):1503–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crisp DJ (1965) Surface chemistry, a factor in the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Proceedings of the 5th marine biological symposium: Botanica Gothoburgrnssia, vol 3. pp 51–65Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crisp DJ (1974) Factors affecting the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Grant PT, Mackie M (eds) Chemoreception in marine invertebrate larvae. Academic Press, New York, pp 177–266Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oloffson A-C, Hermansson M, Elwing H (2003) N-Acetyl-L-cystine affects growth, extracellular polysaccharide production, and bacterial biofilm formation on solid surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4814–4822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts D, Rittschof D, Holm ER, Schmidt AR (1991) Factors influencing initial larval settlement: temporal, spatial, and surface molecular components. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 150:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pawlik JR (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 30:273–335Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rittschof D (2001) Natural product antifoulants and coatings development. In: McClintock J, Baker P (eds) Marine chemical ecology. CRC Press, New York, pp 543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadfield MG, Paul VJ (2001) Natural chemical cues for settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae. In: Mclintock JB, Baker BJ (eds) Marine chemical ecology chap. 13. CRC Press, New York, pp 431–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hadfield M (2011) Biofilms and marine invertebrate larvae: what bacteria produce that larvae use to choose settlement sites. Annu Rev Mar Sci 3:453–470ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Unabia CRC, Hadfield MG (1999) Role of bacteria in larval settlement and metamorphosis of the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar Biol 133:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang Y, Callahan S, Hadfield MG (2012) Recruitment in the sea: bacterial genes required for inducing larval settlement in a polychaete worm. Sci Rep 2:228ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobretsov S, Qian P-Y (2006) Facilitation and inhibition of larval attachment of the bryozoan Bugula neritina in association with mono-species and multi-species biofilms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 333:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khandeparker L, Anil AC, Raghukumar S (2006) Relevance of biofilm bacteria in modulating the larval metamorphosis of Balanus amphitrite. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:425–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qian P-Y, Vengatesen T, Lau SCK, Cheung SCK (2003) Relationship between bacterial community profile in biofilm and attachment of the acorn barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Aquat Microb Ecol 33:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lau SC, Thiyagarajan V, Cheung SC, Qian P-Y (2005) Roles of bacterial community composition in biofilms as a mediator for larval settlement of three marine invertebrates. Aquat Microb Ecol 38:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maki JS, Rittschof D, Costlow JD, Mitchell R (1988) Inhibition of attachment of larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite, by bacterial surface films. Mar Biol 97:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rittschof D (2008) Ships as habitats: biofouling -- a problem that requires global solutions. Cosmos 4(1):71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vasishtha N, Sundberg DC, Rittschof D (1995) Evaluation of release rates and control of biofouling using monolithic coatings containing an isothiazolone. Biofouling 9:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rittschof D (2000) Natural product antifoulants: one perspective on the challenges related to coatings development. Biofouling 32:193–205Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meyer AE, Baier RE, King RW (1988) Initial fouling of nontoxic coatings in fresh, brackish and sea water. Can J Chem Eng 66:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baier RE (1984) Initial events in microbial film formation. In: Costlow JD, Tapper RC (eds) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, pp 57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holm ER, Cannon G, Roberts D, Schmidt AR, Sutherland JP, Rittschof D (1997) The influence of initial surface chemistry on the development of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 215:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sutherland JP (1984) The structure and stability of marine macrofouling communities. In: Costlow JD, Tapper RC (eds) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, pp 202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jacobson AH, Willingham GL (2000) Sea-nine antifoulant: an environmentally acceptable alternative to organotin antifoulants. Sci Total Environ 258(1):103–110ADSCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Romano JA, Rittschof D, McClellan-Green PD, Holm ER (2010) Variation in toxicity of copper pyrithione among populations and families of the barnacle, Balanus amphitrite. Biofouling 26(3):341–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kerns J, Little B (eds) (1994) Microbial induced corrosion testing. ASTM Publication Code Number (PCN) 04-012320-27Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Berdahl P, Akbari A, Levinson R, Miller WA (2008) Weathering of roofing materials. Constr Build Mater 22:423–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manns L (1995) Metal binding capacity of the exopolymer excreted by the common blue green algae, Gloeocapsa. Masters dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Ambient aquatic life water quality criteria for tributyltin (TBT)-Final. EPA 822-R03-031, p 129Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dahlstrom M, Martensson L, Jonsson PR, Arnebrant T, Elwig H (2000) Surface active adrenoreceptor compounds prevent settlement of cyprid larvae of Balanus improvisus. Biofouling 16:191–203.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010009378444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gohad NV, Aldred N, Orihuela B, Clare AS, Rittschof D, Mount AS (2012) Observations on the settlement and cementation of barnacle (Balanus amphitrite) cyprids larvae after artificial exposure to noradrenaline and the locations of adrenergic receptors in the organism. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 416:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Essock-Burns TA, Wepprich A, Thompson A, Rittschof D (2016) Enzymes manage biofilms on crab surfaces aiding in feeding and antifouling. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 479:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Essock-Burns T (2015) Exploring the interface between macroorganisms and microorganisms: biochemical, ecological and evolutionary concepts. Dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rittschof D, Lai CH, Kok LM, Teo SL-M (2003) Pharmaceuticals as antifoulants: concept and principle. Biofouling 19(Suppl. S):207–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Choong AMF, Teo SL-M, Leow JL, Koh HL, Ho PCL (2006) A preliminary ecotoxicity study of pharmaceuticals in the marine environment. J Toxicol Environ Health A 69(21):1959–1970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rittschof D (2009) Novel antifouling coatings: a multiconceptual approach. In: Flemming H-C, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey KE (eds) Marine and industrial biofouling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Choong AMF, Maki JS, Ikhwan JTB, Chen C-L, Rittschof D, Teo SL-M (2010) Pharmaceuticals as antifoulants: inhibition of growth and effects on adhesion of marine bacteria. In: Chan J, Wong S (eds) Biofouling types, impact and anti-fouling. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 221–246Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chai CLL, Teo SL-M, Jameson FKM, Lee SSC, Likhitsup A, Chen C-L, Rittschof D (2014) Loperamide-based compounds as additives for biofouling management. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 89:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rittschof D, Chai C, Teo SL-M, Maki JS (2015) Fouling and its next generation management: a perspective. J Agric Mar Sci 19(1):16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chai CLL, Burkett BA, Teo SL-M, Rittschof D, Lee SSC, Dickinson GH, Hong H (2015) Antifouling compounds and use thereof. US Patent 9,169,223, 27 Oct 2015Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chai CLL, Burkett BA, Teo SL-M, Rittschof D, Lee SSC, Dickinson GH, Hong H (2015) Antifouling compounds and use thereof. US Patent Appl Pub US2016/0009926 A1, 14 Jan 2016Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rittschof D (2008) Novel antifouling coatings: a multiconceptual approach. In: Flemming HC, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey KE (eds) Marine and industrial biofouling. Springer, New York, pp 179–187Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rittschof D (2010) Future trends in antifouling research. In: Hellio C, Yebra DM, Sitton R (eds) Advances in antifouling coatings and technologies. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 725–748Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rittschof D (2010) Research on practical environmentally benign antifouling coatings. In: Dürr S, Thomason J (eds) Biofouling. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 396–409Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rittschof D, Orihuela B, Harder T, Stafslien S, Chisholm B, Dickinson GH (2011) Compounds from silicones alter enzyme activity in curing barnacle glue and model enzymes. PLoS One 6(2):e16487ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rittschof D, Holm ER (1997) Antifouling and foul-release: a primer. In: Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R, Thompson M-F (eds) Recent advances in marine biotechnology, vol. 1, endocrinology and reproduction. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 497–512Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke University Marine LaboratoryBeaufortUSA

Personalised recommendations