Skip to main content

A Multimodal Analysis of Floor Control in Meetings

  • Conference paper
Book cover Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (MLMI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4299))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The participant in a human-to-human communication who controls the floor bears the burden of moving the communication process along. Change in control of the floor can happen through a number of mechanisms, including interruptions, delegation of the floor, and so on. This paper investigates floor control in multiparty meetings that are both audio and video taped; hence, we are able to analyze patterns not only of speech (e.g., discourse markers) but also of visual cues (e.g, eye gaze exchanges) that are commonly involved in floor control changes. Identifying who has control of the floor provides an important focus for information retrieval and summarization of meetings. Additionally, without understanding who has control of the floor, it is impossible to identify important events such as challenges for the floor. In this paper, we analyze multimodal cues related to floor control in two different meetings involving five participants each.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyle, M., Cook, M.: Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., Ruiter, J.P.: Durational aspects of turn-taking in spontaneous face-to-face and telephone dialogues. In: Sojka, P., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2004. LNCS, vol. 3206, pp. 563–570. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Burger, S., MacLaren, V., Yu, H.: The ISL meeting corpus: The impact of meeting type on speech type. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E.: Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kimbara, I., Welji, H., Harper, M., Quek, F., McNeill, D., Duncan, S., Tuttle, R., Huang, T.: VACE multimodal meeting corpus. In: Renals, S., Bengio, S. (eds.) MLMI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3869, pp. 40–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Duncan, S.: Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, 283–292 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ford, C.E., Thompson, S.A.: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In: Ochs, T., Schegloff (eds.) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garofolo, J., Laprum, C., Michel, M., Stanford, V., Tabassi, E.: The NIST Meeting Room Pilot Corpus. In: Proc. of Language Resource and Evaluation Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jovanovic, N., Akker, R.: Towards automatic addressee identification in multi-party dialogues. In: Proceedings of SIGDial (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jovanovic, N., Akker, R., Nijholt, A.: A corpus for studying addressing behavior in multi-party dialogues. In: Proc. of SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jurafsky, D., Rebecca, B., et al.: Automatic detection of discourse structure for speech recognition and understanding. In: Proc. of IEEE Workshop on Speech Recognition and Understanding (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kipp, M.: Anvil: A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. In: Proc. of European Conf. on Speech Processing (EuroSpeech) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, Y.: Structural Event Detection for Rich Transcription of Speech. Ph.D thesis, Purdue University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Local, J., Kelly, J.: Projection and ’silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9, 185–204 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCowan, I., Gatica-Perez, D., Bengio, S., Lathoud, G., Barnard, M., Zhang, D.: Automatic analysis of multimodal group actions in meetings. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(3), 305–317 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan, N., et al.: Meetings about meetings: Research at ICSI on speech in multiparty conversations. In: Proc. of ICASSP, Hong Kong, vol. 4, pp. 740–743 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Novick, D.G., Hansen, B., Ward, K.: Coordinating turn-taking with gaze. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Padilha, E., Carletta, J.: A simulation of small group discussion. In: Proc. of the sixth Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG 2002), Edinburgh, UK, pp. 117–124 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Padilha, E., Carletta, J.: Nonverbal behaviours improving a simulation of small group discussion. In: Proceedings of the First International Nordic Symposium of Multi-modal Communication (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rose, T., Quek, F., Shi, Y.: MacVisSTA: A system for multimodal analysis. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interface (ICMI) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shriberg, E., Dhillon, R., Bhagat, S., Ang, J., Carvey, H.: The ICSI meeting recorder dialog act (MRDA) corpus. In: Proc. of SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torres, O., Cassell, J., Prevost, S.: Modeling gaze behavior as a function of discourse structure. In: Proc. of the First International Workshop on Human-Computer Conversations, Bellagio, Italy (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weilhammer, K., Rabold, S.: Durational aspects in turn taking. In: International Congresses of Phonetic Sciences (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wichmann, A., Caspers, J.: Melodic cues to turn-taking in English: Evidence from perception. In: Proc. of SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, L. et al. (2006). A Multimodal Analysis of Floor Control in Meetings. In: Renals, S., Bengio, S., Fiscus, J.G. (eds) Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. MLMI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4299. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11965152_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11965152_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69267-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69268-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics