Skip to main content

Do Students Recognize Ambiguity in Software Specifications? A Multi-national, Multi-institutional Report

  • Conference paper
Software Engineering Education in the Modern Age (ICSE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4309))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 573 Accesses

Abstract

Successful software engineering requires experience and acknowledgment of complexity, including that which leads designers to recognize ambiguity within the software design description itself. We report on a study of 21 post-secondary institutions from the USA, UK, Sweden, and New Zealand. First competency and graduating students as well as educators were asked to perform a software design task. We found that graduating seniors were more likely to recognize ambiguities in under-specified problems than first competency students. Additionally, participants who addressed all requirements in the design were more likely than others to recognize ambiguities in the design specification. The behavior of recognizing ambiguity and gathering information appear to be independent of past performance, as measured by course grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://depts.washington.edu/srcse/

  2. Adams, R.S., Turns, J., Atman, C.J.: What Could Design Learning Look Like? In: Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium 6, Sydney, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, D.A.: Requiring CS1 student to write requirements specifications: A rationale, implementation suggestions, and a case study. In: Proceedings of the 19th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 13–16 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bursic, K.M., Atman, C.J.: Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process. Quality Management Journal 4(4), 60–75 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fincher, S., Petre, M., Tenenberg, J., Blaha, K., Bouvier, D., et al.: Cause for alarm?: A multi-national, multi-institutional study of student-generated software designs. Technical Report 16-04, Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, Canterbury (September 2004), http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/2004/1953

  7. Fincher, S., Petre, M., Tenenberg, J., et al.: A multi-national, multi-institutional study of student-generated software designs. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Finnish / Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gause, D., Weinberg, G.: Are Your Lights On? Winthrop Publishers, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guindon, R., Krasner, H., Curtis, B.: Breakdowns and processes during early activities of software design by professionals. In: Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hilburn, T.: Inspections of formal specifications. In: Proceedings of the 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 150–154 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jeffries, R., Turner, A.A., Polson, P.G., Atwood, M.E.: The processes involved in designing software, Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCracken, W.M., et al.: A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students. SIGCSE Bulletin 33(4), 125–180 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soloway, E., Ehrlich, K.: Empirical studies of programming knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(5), 595–609 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tenenberg, J., et al.: A multi-national, multi-institutional study of student-generated software designs. Informatics in Education 4(1), 143–162 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiedenbeck, S.: Novice/expert differences in programming skills. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23, 383–390 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

VanDeGrift, T., Simon, B., Sanders, D., Blaha, K. (2006). Do Students Recognize Ambiguity in Software Specifications? A Multi-national, Multi-institutional Report. In: Inverardi, P., Jazayeri, M. (eds) Software Engineering Education in the Modern Age. ICSE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4309. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11949374_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11949374_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68203-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68204-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics