Skip to main content

The Affective and Pragmatic Coding of Prosody

  • Conference paper
Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4274))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Prosody or intonation is a prime carrier of affective information, a function that has often been neglected in speech research. Most work on prosody has been informed by linguistic models of sentence intonation that focus on accent structure and which are based on widely differing theoretical assumptions. Human speech production includes both prosodic coding of emotions, such as anger or happiness, and pragmatic intonations, such as interrogative or affirmative modes, as part of the language codes. The differentiation between these two types of prosody still presents a major problem to speech researchers. It is argued that this distinction becomes more feasible when it is acknowledged that these two types of prosody are differently affected by the so-called “push” and “pull” effects. Push effects, influenced by psychophysiological activation, strongly affect emotional prosody, whereas pull effects, influenced by cultural rules of expression, predominantly affect intonation or pragmatic prosody, even though both processes influence all prosodic production. The push-pull distinction implies that biological marking (push) is directly externalized in motor expression, whereas pull effects (based on socio-cultural norms or desirable, esteemed reference persons) will require the shaping of the expression to conform to these models. Given that the underlying biological processes are likely to be dependent on both the idiosyncratic nature of the individual and the specific nature of the situation, we would expect relatively strong inter-individual differences in the expressive patterns resulting from push effects. This is not the case for pull effects. Here, because of the very nature of the models that pull the expression, we would expect a very high degree of symbolization and conventionalization, in other words comparatively few and small individual differences. With respect to cross-cultural comparison, we would expect the opposite: very few differences between cultures for push effects, large differences for pull effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scherer, K.R. (2006). The Affective and Pragmatic Coding of Prosody. In: Huo, Q., Ma, B., Chng, ES., Li, H. (eds) Chinese Spoken Language Processing. ISCSLP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4274. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11939993_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11939993_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49666-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics